Landová Eva, Polák Jakub, Janovcová Markéta, Štolhoferová Iveta, Peterková Šárka, Chomik Aleksandra, Frynta Daniel
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia.
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 15;15:1520224. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1520224. eCollection 2024.
Threats to our survival are often posed by the environment in which humans have evolved or live today. Animal and human ancestors developed complex physiological and behavioral response systems to cope with two types of threats: immediate physical harm from predators or conspecifics, triggering fear, and the risk of infections from parasites and pathogens leading to the evolution of the behavioral immune system (BIS) with disgust as the key emotion. Here we ask whether the BIS has adapted to protect us from pandemic risks or poisoning by modern toxic substances.
We have developed a survey comprised of 60 vignettes describing threats evoking fear and disgust belonging to one of the three main categories of threats: (1) ancestral, (2) modern, and (3) pandemic of airborne disease. Each vignette was evaluated on a 7-point Likert scale based on fear, disgust, and anger. Respondents also completed an assessment battery.
The results show that the strongest fear is triggered by modern threats (electricity, car accidents), while the highest disgust is evoked by ancient threats (body waste products, worms). Disgust does not respond to modern threat stimuli such as toxic substances or radioactivity as these evoke mainly fear and anger. A discriminant factor analysis classified nine out of 10 pandemic disgust vignettes into the ancestral disgust category, convincingly assigning the pandemic disgust threats to the ancestral type. Gender, age, and type of education were significant moderators of emotional responses across all threat categories.
Our study reveals that while fear is more context-dependent, particularly triggered by modern threats, disgust operates on an evolutionarily hardwired basis, making it less effective against contemporary risks. Furthermore, disgust experienced during a pandemic outbreak is more closely aligned with ancestral disgust-related threats tapping into evolutionary ancient survival circuits of the BIS. However, as disgust declines with age, the brain must adaptatively shift the emotional processing from disgust to fear to protect older adults from contamination risks. Finally, our study reveals that pandemic fear is better predicted by specific behaviors rather than general anxiety, suggesting a need for new assessments.
对我们生存的威胁往往来自人类进化或现今生活的环境。动物和人类祖先发展出复杂的生理和行为反应系统来应对两种类型的威胁:来自捕食者或同种个体的直接身体伤害,引发恐惧;以及来自寄生虫和病原体感染的风险,导致以厌恶为关键情绪的行为免疫系统(BIS)的进化。在此,我们探讨行为免疫系统是否已适应保护我们免受大流行风险或现代有毒物质中毒的影响。
我们编制了一项包含60个小场景的调查,描述引发恐惧和厌恶的威胁,这些威胁属于三类主要威胁之一:(1)祖传的,(2)现代的,以及(3)空气传播疾病的大流行。每个小场景根据恐惧、厌恶和愤怒在7点李克特量表上进行评估。受访者还完成了一组评估。
结果表明,最强烈的恐惧由现代威胁(电、车祸)引发,而最高的厌恶由古老威胁(身体排泄物、蠕虫)引发。厌恶对现代威胁刺激(如有毒物质或辐射)没有反应,因为这些主要引发恐惧和愤怒。判别因素分析将10个大流行厌恶小场景中的9个归类为祖传厌恶类别,令人信服地将大流行厌恶威胁归为祖传类型。性别、年龄和教育类型是所有威胁类别中情绪反应的显著调节因素。
我们的研究表明,虽然恐惧更依赖于情境,特别是由现代威胁引发,但厌恶基于进化上的固有机制起作用,使其在应对当代风险时效果较差。此外,在大流行爆发期间经历的厌恶与利用行为免疫系统进化上古老的生存回路的祖传厌恶相关威胁更为紧密相关。然而,由于厌恶随年龄下降,大脑必须适应性地将情绪处理从厌恶转变为恐惧,以保护老年人免受污染风险。最后,我们的研究表明,大流行恐惧通过特定行为比一般焦虑能得到更好的预测,这表明需要新的评估方法。