Suppr超能文献

在实验性坏死性肠炎攻毒期间,抗生素和合生元补充剂对肉鸡生产性能和坏死性肠炎严重程度的比较评估。

A comparative evaluation of antibiotic and synbiotic supplementation on production performance and necrotic enteritis severity in broilers during an experimental necrotic enteritis challenge.

作者信息

Shah Bikas Raj, Al Hakeem Walid Ghazi, Shanmugasundaram Revathi, Selvaraj Ramesh K

机构信息

Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.

Toxicology and Mycotoxin Research Unit, Agriculture Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Athens, GA, United States.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2025 Jan 15;15:1511380. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1511380. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

The ban on antibiotics in the poultry diet resulted in re-emergence of several infectious diseases including necrotic enteritis (NE). These infectious diseases are leading to poor health and welfare as well as production and economic loss. Synbiotic could be a potential candidate to replace the antibiotics in poultry diet. Therefore, a 35-day study was conducted to compare the efficacy of synbiotic (PoultryStarME) and antibiotic (Stafac50, Virginiamycin) supplementation during an experimentally induced necrotic enteritis infection. A total of 360 day-old chicks were randomly assigned to four treatment groups: Antibiotic, Challenge + Antibiotic, Synbiotic, and Challenge + Synbiotic, each with 6 replicates. The treatment groups referred as "Challenge + Antibiotic" and "Challenge + Synbiotic" were challenged, while their respective non-challenged treatment groups were "antibiotic" and "synbiotic". NE in birds was induced by gavaging 1 × 10 oocysts of on day 14 and 1 × 10 CFU/mL of on D19, 20, and 21. Both synbiotic and antibiotic supplementation during the NE challenge did not improve BW gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio at the end of the experiment (D0-35). However, antibiotic supplementation reduced mortality during the week of the challenge (D14-21) . At D21, both synbiotic and antibiotic supplementation during the NE challenge did not decrease the intestinal lesion score compared to their respective non-challenged treatment groups. At D21, synbiotic supplementation during the NE challenge did not decrease intestinal permeability compared to the synbiotic group. At D21, antibiotic supplementation during the NE challenge increased the CD4+:CD8+ T cells in the cecal tonsil. It can be concluded that synbiotic supplementation elicited an immune response, decreasing the inflammatory response in the intestine and ameliorating the NE infection. Therefore, synbiotic could be a potential alternative to replace antibiotics in the poultry industry, but their efficacy needs to be improved through blending additional probiotics and prebiotics, and further exploration is required.

摘要

家禽日粮中抗生素的禁用导致包括坏死性肠炎(NE)在内的几种传染病再次出现。这些传染病导致家禽健康和福利不佳,以及生产和经济损失。合生元可能是替代家禽日粮中抗生素的潜在候选物。因此,进行了一项为期35天的研究,以比较在实验性诱导的坏死性肠炎感染期间补充合生元(PoultryStarME)和抗生素(Stafac50、维吉尼亚霉素)的效果。总共360只1日龄雏鸡被随机分配到四个处理组:抗生素组、攻毒+抗生素组、合生元组和攻毒+合生元组,每组6个重复。被称为“攻毒+抗生素”和“攻毒+合生元”的处理组接受攻毒,而各自未攻毒的处理组为“抗生素”组和“合生元”组。在第14天通过灌胃1×10个球虫卵囊以及在第19、20和21天灌胃1×10 CFU/mL的 诱导家禽发生NE。在坏死性肠炎攻毒期间补充合生元和抗生素在实验结束时(第0 - 35天)均未改善体重增加、采食量和饲料转化率。然而,补充抗生素降低了攻毒周(第14 - 21天)的死亡率。在第21天,与各自未攻毒的处理组相比,坏死性肠炎攻毒期间补充合生元和抗生素均未降低肠道病变评分。在第21天,与合生元组相比,坏死性肠炎攻毒期间补充合生元并未降低肠道通透性。在第21天,坏死性肠炎攻毒期间补充抗生素增加了盲肠扁桃体中CD4⁺:CD8⁺ T细胞的比例。可以得出结论,补充合生元引发了免疫反应,降低了肠道中的炎症反应并改善了坏死性肠炎感染。因此,合生元可能是家禽业中替代抗生素的潜在替代品,但需要通过混合额外的益生菌和益生元来提高其功效,并且需要进一步探索。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fa6/11774996/91494139239f/fphys-15-1511380-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验