• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性疼痛到脊髓刺激的延迟时间越长,导致更高的医疗资源利用。

Longer Delay From Chronic Pain to Spinal Cord Stimulation Results in Higher Healthcare Resource Utilization.

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

Health Economics and Outcomes Research, St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA, USA.

出版信息

Neuromodulation. 2016 Jul;19(5):469-76. doi: 10.1111/ner.12389. Epub 2016 Feb 29.

DOI:10.1111/ner.12389
PMID:26923728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4961539/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A shorter delay time from chronic pain diagnosis to spinal cord stimulation (SCS) implantation may make it more likely to achieve lasting therapeutic efficacy with SCS. The objective of this analysis was to determine the impact of pain-to-SCS time on patients' post-implant healthcare resource utilization (HCRU).

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was performed using a real-world patient cohort derived from MarketScan(®) Commercial and Medicare Supplemental claims data bases from April 2008 through March 2013. The predictor variable was the time from the first diagnosis of chronic pain to permanent SCS implant. Using multivariable analysis, we studied the impact of pain-to-SCS time on HCRU in the first year post-implant. For some regression tests, patients were grouped into terciles by HCRU.

RESULTS

A total of 762 patients met inclusion criteria, with a median pain-to-SCS time of 1.35 years (Q1: 0.8, Q3: 1.9). For every one-year increase in pain-to-SCS time, the odds increased by 33% for being in the high medical expenditures group (defined using the upper tercile: $4133 over above) over the low group (first lower: $603 or less). The odds increased by 39% for being in the high opioid prescriptions group (10-58 prescriptions) over the low group (0-1). The odds increased by 44% and 55%, respectively, for being in the high office visits (8-77) or hospitalizations (3-28) group over the low office visits (0-2) or hospitalizations (0) group.

CONCLUSIONS

HCRU increased in the year following SCS implantation with longer pain-to-SCS time. These results suggest that considering SCS earlier in the care continuum for chronic pain may improve patient outcomes, with reductions in hospitalizations, clinic visits, and opioid usage.

摘要

简介

慢性疼痛诊断后至脊髓刺激(SCS)植入的时间越短,SCS 实现持久治疗效果的可能性就越大。本分析的目的是确定疼痛至 SCS 时间对患者植入后医疗保健资源利用(HCRU)的影响。

方法

使用来自 MarketScan(®)商业和医疗保险补充数据库的真实患者队列进行回顾性观察性研究,时间为 2008 年 4 月至 2013 年 3 月。预测变量是从慢性疼痛首次诊断到永久性 SCS 植入的时间。使用多变量分析,我们研究了植入后第一年疼痛至 SCS 时间对 HCRU 的影响。对于一些回归测试,根据 HCRU 将患者分为三分位数组。

结果

共有 762 名患者符合纳入标准,疼痛至 SCS 时间的中位数为 1.35 年(Q1:0.8,Q3:1.9)。每增加一年疼痛至 SCS 的时间,在高医疗支出组(定义为上三分位数:超过$4133)中而不是低支出组(第一低:$603 或更少)的几率增加 33%。在高阿片类药物处方组(10-58 张处方)中而不是低处方组(0-1)的几率增加 39%。在高门诊就诊(8-77)或住院(3-28)组中而不是低门诊就诊(0-2)或住院(0)组的几率分别增加 44%和 55%。

结论

随着疼痛至 SCS 时间的延长,SCS 植入后一年的 HCRU 增加。这些结果表明,在慢性疼痛的护理连续体中更早考虑 SCS 可能会改善患者的预后,减少住院、就诊和阿片类药物的使用。

相似文献

1
Longer Delay From Chronic Pain to Spinal Cord Stimulation Results in Higher Healthcare Resource Utilization.慢性疼痛到脊髓刺激的延迟时间越长,导致更高的医疗资源利用。
Neuromodulation. 2016 Jul;19(5):469-76. doi: 10.1111/ner.12389. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
2
The Volume-Outcome Effect: Impact on Trial-to-Permanent Conversion Rates in Spinal Cord Stimulation.容量-结果效应:对脊髓刺激试验至永久转换率的影响
Neuromodulation. 2017 Apr;20(3):256-262. doi: 10.1111/ner.12526. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
3
Spinal Cord Stimulation vs Conventional Therapies for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back and Leg Pain: A Systematic Review of Health Care Resource Utilization and Outcomes in the Last Decade.脊髓刺激疗法与传统疗法治疗慢性腰腿痛的比较:过去十年医疗资源利用和治疗结果的系统评价
Pain Med. 2019 Dec 1;20(12):2479-2494. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz185.
4
The impact of obesity on the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in chronic spine-related pain patients.肥胖对脊髓刺激治疗慢性脊柱相关疼痛患者有效性的影响。
Spine J. 2019 Mar;19(3):476-486. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
5
Health Care Resource Utilization of High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Treatment of Chronic Refractory Low Back Pain.高频脊髓刺激治疗慢性难治性下腰痛的医疗资源利用情况
Neuromodulation. 2023 Jan;26(1):115-123. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.03.013. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
6
Explantation Rates and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Spinal Cord Stimulation.脊髓刺激的植入取出率及医疗资源利用情况
Neuromodulation. 2017 Jun;20(4):331-339. doi: 10.1111/ner.12567. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
7
Association of Opioid Usage with Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcomes.阿片类药物使用与脊髓刺激治疗效果的相关性。
Pain Med. 2018 Apr 1;19(4):699-707. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx262.
8
Socioeconomic Disparities in the Utilization of Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy in Patients with Chronic Pain.社会经济差异对慢性疼痛患者脊髓刺激疗法利用的影响。
Pain Pract. 2021 Jan;21(1):75-82. doi: 10.1111/papr.12936. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
9
The rate of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with spinal cord stimulation.脊髓刺激患者的磁共振成像率。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 May 1;40(9):E531-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000805.
10
Association Between Pain Scores and Successful Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation.疼痛评分与脊髓刺激器成功植入的相关性研究。
Neuromodulation. 2020 Jul;23(5):660-666. doi: 10.1111/ner.13044. Epub 2019 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive Factors of Successful Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study.慢性疼痛患者脊髓刺激成功的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Brain Sci. 2025 Jun 6;15(6):614. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15060614.
2
A Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Spinal Cord Stimulation versus Conventional Medical Management for the Treatment of Low Back Pain Using Data from DISTINCT RCT and Medical Claims from a U.S. Commercial Payer Database.使用DISTINCT随机对照试验数据和美国商业医保数据库中的医疗理赔数据,对脊髓刺激疗法与传统药物治疗方法治疗腰痛进行成本效益分析。
J Pain Res. 2025 Jun 7;18:2823-2838. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S486759. eCollection 2025.
3
Surgical treatment of refractory low back pain using implanted BurstDR spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in a cohort of patients without options for corrective surgery: Findings and results from the DISTINCT study, a prospective randomized multi-center-controlled trial.在一组没有矫正手术选择的患者中使用植入式BurstDR脊髓刺激(SCS)治疗难治性腰痛:DISTINCT研究的结果,一项前瞻性随机多中心对照试验。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2024 Jun 21;19:100508. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100508. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Healthcare Utilization (HCU) Reduction with High-Frequency (10 kHz) Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Therapy.高频(10千赫)脊髓刺激(SCS)疗法降低医疗保健利用率(HCU)
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 29;12(7):745. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12070745.
5
Treatment of Refractory Low Back Pain Using Passive Recharge Burst in Patients Without Options for Corrective Surgery: Findings and Results From the DISTINCT Study, a Prospective Randomized Multicenter Controlled Trial.采用被动式充电脉冲治疗无矫正手术选择的难治性腰痛患者:DISTINCT 研究的发现和结果,一项前瞻性随机多中心对照试验。
Neuromodulation. 2023 Oct;26(7):1387-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.07.009. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
6
Needs-based novel digital curriculum for the neuromodulation training deficit: Pain Rounds.基于需求的新型数字课程,用于弥补神经调控培训的不足:疼痛轮训。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Aug;48(8):414-419. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104480. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
7
The role of endogenous opioid neuropeptides in neurostimulation-driven analgesia.内源性阿片神经肽在神经刺激驱动镇痛中的作用。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Dec 14;16:1044686. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.1044686. eCollection 2022.
8
Multidisciplinary Firms and the Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Case Study of Low Back Pain.多学科公司与慢性疼痛治疗:以腰痛为例的案例研究
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 10;2:781433. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2021.781433. eCollection 2021.
9
Decreased Opioid Consumption and Durable Pain Relief in Patients Treated with 10 kHz SCS: A Retrospective Analysis of Outcomes from Single-Center.10kHz脊髓刺激疗法治疗患者的阿片类药物消耗量减少及持久疼痛缓解:单中心结局的回顾性分析
J Pain Res. 2021 Aug 24;14:2593-2600. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S312932. eCollection 2021.
10
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients awaiting spinal cord stimulation surgery in the United Kingdom: a multi-centre patient survey.2019年冠状病毒病疫情对英国等待脊髓刺激手术患者的影响:一项多中心患者调查
Br J Pain. 2021 Aug;15(3):282-290. doi: 10.1177/2049463720948092. Epub 2020 Aug 21.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness and risks of long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review for a National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention Workshop.长期阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的效果和风险:美国国立卫生研究院预防途径研讨会的系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Feb 17;162(4):276-86. doi: 10.7326/M14-2559.
2
Is preoperative pain duration important in spinal cord stimulation? A comparison between tonic and burst stimulation.术前疼痛持续时间在脊髓刺激中重要吗?强直刺激与脉冲刺激的比较。
Neuromodulation. 2015 Jan;18(1):13-7; discussion 17. doi: 10.1111/ner.12253. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
3
Prevalence of persistent pain in the U.S. adult population: new data from the 2010 national health interview survey.美国成年人口中持续性疼痛的患病率:2010年全国健康访谈调查的新数据。
J Pain. 2014 Oct;15(10):979-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.05.009.
4
Spinal cord stimulation in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy: a multicentre randomized clinical trial.脊髓刺激治疗疼痛性糖尿病神经病变患者:一项多中心随机临床试验。
Pain. 2014 Nov;155(11):2426-31. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.08.031. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
5
Impact of wait times on spinal cord stimulation therapy outcomes.等待时间对脊髓刺激疗法效果的影响。
Pain Pract. 2014 Nov;14(8):709-20. doi: 10.1111/papr.12126. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
6
Predictors of pain relief following spinal cord stimulation in chronic back and leg pain and failed back surgery syndrome: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.慢性腰腿痛和腰椎手术失败综合征患者脊髓刺激后疼痛缓解的预测因素:一项系统评价和Meta回归分析
Pain Pract. 2014 Jul;14(6):489-505. doi: 10.1111/papr.12095. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
7
Cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation therapy in management of chronic pain.脊髓刺激疗法治疗慢性疼痛的成本效益分析。
Pain Med. 2013 Nov;14(11):1631-49. doi: 10.1111/pme.12146. Epub 2013 May 24.
8
The economic costs of pain in the United States.美国疼痛的经济代价。
J Pain. 2012 Aug;13(8):715-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 May 16.
9
A socioeconomic survey of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) surgery.脊髓刺激(SCS)手术的社会经济学调查。
Neuromodulation. 2010 Oct;13(4):265-8; discussion 269. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2010.00292.x.
10
Financial impact of spinal cord stimulation on the healthcare budget: a comparative analysis of costs in Canada and the United States.脊髓刺激对医疗保健预算的财务影响:加拿大和美国成本的比较分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Jun;10(6):564-73. doi: 10.3171/2009.2.SPINE0865.