• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症中基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统的面向用户需求:多方法研究项目方案

User-Oriented Requirements for Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems in Sepsis: Protocol for a Multimethod Research Project.

作者信息

Raszke Pascal, Giebel Godwin Denk, Abels Carina, Wasem Jürgen, Adamzik Michael, Nowak Hartmuth, Palmowski Lars, Heinz Philipp, Mreyen Silke, Timmesfeld Nina, Tokic Marianne, Brunkhorst Frank Martin, Blase Nikola

机构信息

Institute for Health Care Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jan 30;14:e62704. doi: 10.2196/62704.

DOI:10.2196/62704
PMID:39883929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11826947/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have been developed for several diseases. However, despite the potential to improve the quality of care and thereby positively impact patient-relevant outcomes, the majority of AI-based CDSS have not been adopted in standard care. Possible reasons for this include barriers in the implementation and a nonuser-oriented development approach, resulting in reduced user acceptance.

OBJECTIVE

This research project has 2 objectives. First, problems and corresponding solutions that hinder or support the development and implementation of AI-based CDSS are identified. Second, the research project aims to increase user acceptance by creating a user-oriented requirement profile, using the example of sepsis.

METHODS

The research project is based on a multimethod approach combining (1) a scoping review, (2) focus groups with physicians and professional caregivers, and (3) semistructured interviews with relevant stakeholders. The research modules mentioned provide the basis for the development of a (4) survey, including a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with physicians. A minimum of 6667 physicians with expertise in the clinical picture of sepsis are contacted for this purpose. The survey is followed by the development of a requirement profile for AI-based CDSS and the derivation of policy recommendations for action, which are evaluated in a (5) expert roundtable discussion.

RESULTS

The multimethod research project started in November 2022. It provides an overview of the barriers and corresponding solutions related to the development and implementation of AI-based CDSS. Using sepsis as an example, a user-oriented requirement profile for AI-based CDSS is developed. The scoping review has been concluded and the qualitative modules have been subjected to analysis. The start of the survey, including the DCE, was at the end of July 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the research project represent the first attempt to create a comprehensive user-oriented requirement profile for the development of sepsis-specific AI-based CDSS. In addition, general recommendations are derived, in order to reduce barriers in the development and implementation of AI-based CDSS. The findings of this research project have the potential to facilitate the integration of AI-based CDSS into standard care in the long term.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/62704.

摘要

背景

基于人工智能(AI)的临床决策支持系统(CDSS)已针对多种疾病开发。然而,尽管有潜力提高医疗质量并从而对与患者相关的结果产生积极影响,但大多数基于AI的CDSS尚未在标准护理中得到采用。其可能的原因包括实施过程中的障碍以及非以用户为导向的开发方法,导致用户接受度降低。

目的

本研究项目有两个目标。首先,确定阻碍或支持基于AI的CDSS开发与实施的问题及相应解决方案。其次,该研究项目旨在以脓毒症为例,通过创建以用户为导向的需求概况来提高用户接受度。

方法

该研究项目基于一种多方法途径,结合了(1)范围综述、(2)与医生和专业护理人员的焦点小组讨论以及(3)与相关利益相关者的半结构化访谈。上述研究模块为(4)一项调查的开展提供了基础,该调查包括针对医生的离散选择实验(DCE)。为此,至少联系了6667名具有脓毒症临床表现专业知识的医生。在该调查之后,制定基于AI的CDSS的需求概况并得出行动政策建议,这些将在(5)一次专家圆桌讨论中进行评估。

结果

该多方法研究项目于2022年11月启动。它概述了与基于AI的CDSS开发和实施相关的障碍及相应解决方案。以脓毒症为例,制定了基于AI的CDSS的以用户为导向的需求概况。范围综述已完成,定性模块已进行分析。包括DCE在内的调查于2024年7月底开始。

结论

该研究项目的结果代表了首次尝试为特定于脓毒症的基于AI的CDSS开发创建全面的以用户为导向的需求概况。此外,还得出了一般性建议,以减少基于AI的CDSS开发和实施中的障碍。该研究项目的结果有可能长期促进基于AI的CDSS融入标准护理。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/62704。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d90/11826947/4366bf1af985/resprot_v14i1e62704_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d90/11826947/4366bf1af985/resprot_v14i1e62704_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d90/11826947/4366bf1af985/resprot_v14i1e62704_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
User-Oriented Requirements for Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems in Sepsis: Protocol for a Multimethod Research Project.脓毒症中基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统的面向用户需求:多方法研究项目方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jan 30;14:e62704. doi: 10.2196/62704.
2
An AI-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Antibiotic Therapy in Sepsis (KINBIOTICS): Use Case Analysis.基于人工智能的脓毒症抗生素治疗临床决策支持系统(KINBIOTICS):用例分析
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Mar 4;12:e66699. doi: 10.2196/66699.
3
Challenges and Facilitation Approaches for the Participatory Design of AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: Protocol for a Scoping Review.基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统参与式设计的挑战和促进方法:系统评价方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Sep 5;13:e58185. doi: 10.2196/58185.
4
Expectations of Intensive Care Physicians Regarding an AI-Based Decision Support System for Weaning From Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: Predevelopment Survey Study.重症监护医师对基于人工智能的持续肾脏替代治疗撤机决策支持系统的期望:开发前调查研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Apr 23;13:e63709. doi: 10.2196/63709.
5
Acceptance, Barriers, and Facilitators to Implementing Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision Support Systems in Emergency Departments: Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation.急诊科实施基于人工智能的决策支持系统的接受度、障碍与促进因素:定量与定性评估
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 13;6(6):e36501. doi: 10.2196/36501.
6
Problems and Barriers Related to the Use of AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: Interview Study.与基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统使用相关的问题与障碍:访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 3;27:e63377. doi: 10.2196/63377.
7
Expectations and Requirements of Surgical Staff for an AI-Supported Clinical Decision Support System for Older Patients: Qualitative Study.外科医护人员对用于老年患者的人工智能支持临床决策支持系统的期望与要求:定性研究
JMIR Aging. 2024 Dec 17;7:e57899. doi: 10.2196/57899.
8
Clinicians' roles and necessary levels of understanding in the use of artificial intelligence: A qualitative interview study with German medical students.临床医生在使用人工智能方面的角色和必要的理解水平:一项对德国医学生的定性访谈研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Oct 7;25(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01109-w.
9
A Clinical Decision Support System for Sleep Staging Tasks With Explanations From Artificial Intelligence: User-Centered Design and Evaluation Study.具有人工智能解释的睡眠分期任务临床决策支持系统:以用户为中心的设计和评估研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 19;24(1):e28659. doi: 10.2196/28659.
10
Perceived Trust and Professional Identity Threat in AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: Scenario-Based Experimental Study on AI Process Design Features.基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统中的感知信任与职业身份威胁:关于人工智能流程设计特征的情景式实验研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 26;9:e64266. doi: 10.2196/64266.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems and Their Integration Into Care From the Perspective of Experts: Interview Study Among Different Stakeholders.从专家视角看基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统的改进及其在医疗中的整合:不同利益相关者访谈研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jul 7;13:e69688. doi: 10.2196/69688.

本文引用的文献

1
Adoption of novel biomarker test parameters with machine learning-based algorithms for the early detection of sepsis in hospital practice.采用基于机器学习算法的新型生物标志物检测参数,用于医院实践中脓毒症的早期检测。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Nov;30(8):3754-3764. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13807. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
2
Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study - objectives, procedure and experiences.GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS研究中的性别多样性调查——目标、程序与经验
J Health Monit. 2022 Jun 29;7(2):48-65. doi: 10.25646/9958. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Prospective, multi-site study of patient outcomes after implementation of the TREWS machine learning-based early warning system for sepsis.
采用 TREWS 机器学习为基础的脓毒症早期预警系统后,对患者预后的前瞻性、多中心研究。
Nat Med. 2022 Jul;28(7):1455-1460. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01894-0. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
4
Challenges to implementing artificial intelligence in healthcare: a qualitative interview study with healthcare leaders in Sweden.人工智能在医疗保健领域应用面临的挑战:瑞典医疗保健领导人的定性访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 1;22(1):850. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08215-8.
5
Comparison between machine learning methods for mortality prediction for sepsis patients with different social determinants.基于不同社会决定因素的脓毒症患者死亡率预测的机器学习方法比较。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jun 16;22(Suppl 2):156. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01871-0.
6
Implementation approaches and barriers for rule-based and machine learning-based sepsis risk prediction tools: a qualitative study.基于规则和基于机器学习的脓毒症风险预测工具的实施方法与障碍:一项定性研究
JAMIA Open. 2022 Apr 18;5(2):ooac022. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac022. eCollection 2022 Jul.
7
Accessing Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision-Making.利用人工智能进行临床决策。
Front Digit Health. 2021 Jun 25;3:645232. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.645232. eCollection 2021.
8
Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision Support in Sepsis.用于脓毒症临床决策支持的人工智能
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 May 13;8:665464. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.665464. eCollection 2021.
9
Who is afraid of black box algorithms? On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI.谁害怕黑箱算法?论对医学人工智能信任的认识论与伦理基础。
J Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 18. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106820.
10
Integrating a Machine Learning System Into Clinical Workflows: Qualitative Study.将机器学习系统整合到临床工作流程中:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 19;22(11):e22421. doi: 10.2196/22421.