• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将机器学习系统整合到临床工作流程中:定性研究。

Integrating a Machine Learning System Into Clinical Workflows: Qualitative Study.

机构信息

Trinity College of Arts & Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 19;22(11):e22421. doi: 10.2196/22421.

DOI:10.2196/22421
PMID:33211015
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7714645/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Machine learning models have the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and management of acute conditions. Despite growing efforts to evaluate and validate such models, little is known about how to best translate and implement these products as part of routine clinical care.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the factors influencing the integration of a machine learning sepsis early warning system (Sepsis Watch) into clinical workflows.

METHODS

We conducted semistructured interviews with 15 frontline emergency department physicians and rapid response team nurses who participated in the Sepsis Watch quality improvement initiative. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. We used a modified grounded theory approach to identify key themes and analyze qualitative data.

RESULTS

A total of 3 dominant themes emerged: perceived utility and trust, implementation of Sepsis Watch processes, and workforce considerations. Participants described their unfamiliarity with machine learning models. As a result, clinician trust was influenced by the perceived accuracy and utility of the model from personal program experience. Implementation of Sepsis Watch was facilitated by the easy-to-use tablet application and communication strategies that were developed by nurses to share model outputs with physicians. Barriers included the flow of information among clinicians and gaps in knowledge about the model itself and broader workflow processes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study generated insights into how frontline clinicians perceived machine learning models and the barriers to integrating them into clinical workflows. These findings can inform future efforts to implement machine learning interventions in real-world settings and maximize the adoption of these interventions.

摘要

背景

机器学习模型具有提高急性疾病诊断准确性和管理水平的潜力。尽管越来越多的人致力于评估和验证这些模型,但对于如何将这些产品作为常规临床护理的一部分进行最佳转化和实施,知之甚少。

目的

本研究旨在探讨影响机器学习脓毒症预警系统(Sepsis Watch)整合到临床工作流程中的因素。

方法

我们对半参与 Sepsis Watch 质量改进计划的 15 名一线急诊医生和快速反应小组护士进行了半结构式访谈。访谈进行了录音并转录。我们使用改良的扎根理论方法来确定主要主题并分析定性数据。

结果

共出现 3 个主要主题:感知效用和信任、Sepsis Watch 流程的实施以及劳动力考虑因素。参与者描述了他们对机器学习模型的不熟悉。因此,临床医生的信任受到个人项目经验中模型准确性和实用性的影响。Sepsis Watch 的实施得益于易于使用的平板电脑应用程序和护士开发的沟通策略,这些策略用于与医生共享模型输出。障碍包括临床医生之间的信息流以及对模型本身和更广泛工作流程的知识差距。

结论

本研究深入了解了一线临床医生如何看待机器学习模型,以及将其整合到临床工作流程中的障碍。这些发现可以为未来在实际环境中实施机器学习干预措施以及最大程度地采用这些干预措施提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/408a/7714645/42eb5fedca81/jmir_v22i11e22421_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/408a/7714645/42eb5fedca81/jmir_v22i11e22421_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/408a/7714645/42eb5fedca81/jmir_v22i11e22421_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Integrating a Machine Learning System Into Clinical Workflows: Qualitative Study.将机器学习系统整合到临床工作流程中:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 19;22(11):e22421. doi: 10.2196/22421.
2
Real-World Integration of a Sepsis Deep Learning Technology Into Routine Clinical Care: Implementation Study.将脓毒症深度学习技术实际整合到常规临床护理中的实施研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jul 15;8(7):e15182. doi: 10.2196/15182.
3
Factors Influencing Clinician Trust in Predictive Clinical Decision Support Systems for In-Hospital Deterioration: Qualitative Descriptive Study.影响临床医生对院内病情恶化预测性临床决策支持系统信任度的因素:定性描述性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 May 12;9(2):e33960. doi: 10.2196/33960.
4
Machine Learning-Based Early Warning Systems for Clinical Deterioration: Systematic Scoping Review.基于机器学习的临床恶化预警系统:系统范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 4;23(2):e25187. doi: 10.2196/25187.
5
Attitudes of emergency department physicians and nurses toward implementation of an early warning score to identify critically ill patients: qualitative explanations for failed implementation.急诊科医生和护士对实施早期预警评分以识别危重病患者的态度:实施失败的定性解释。
CJEM. 2019 Mar;21(2):269-273. doi: 10.1017/cem.2018.392. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
6
Desired Characteristics of a Clinical Decision Support System for Early Sepsis Recognition: Interview Study Among Hospital-Based Clinicians.用于早期脓毒症识别的临床决策支持系统的理想特征:基于医院的临床医生访谈研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Oct 21;9(4):e36976. doi: 10.2196/36976.
7
Implementation approaches and barriers for rule-based and machine learning-based sepsis risk prediction tools: a qualitative study.基于规则和基于机器学习的脓毒症风险预测工具的实施方法与障碍:一项定性研究
JAMIA Open. 2022 Apr 18;5(2):ooac022. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac022. eCollection 2022 Jul.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
Implementation and workflow strategies for integrating digital therapeutics for alcohol use disorders into primary care: a qualitative study.将数字治疗方法用于酒精使用障碍的实施和工作流程策略,纳入初级保健:一项定性研究。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2023 May 8;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13722-023-00387-w.
10
Adoption of novel biomarker test parameters with machine learning-based algorithms for the early detection of sepsis in hospital practice.采用基于机器学习算法的新型生物标志物检测参数,用于医院实践中脓毒症的早期检测。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Nov;30(8):3754-3764. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13807. Epub 2022 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
A predictive model for sepsis risk in patients with non-traumatic cerebral hemorrhage based on the MIMIC-IV database.基于MIMIC-IV数据库的非创伤性脑出血患者脓毒症风险预测模型
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 9;15(1):24765. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10119-6.
2
Guiding Clostridioides difficile Infection Prevention Efforts in a Hospital Setting With AI.利用人工智能指导医院环境中艰难梭菌感染的预防工作。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2515213. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.15213.
3
Critical activities for successful implementation and adoption of AI in healthcare: towards a process framework for healthcare organizations.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine learning for early detection of sepsis: an internal and temporal validation study.用于脓毒症早期检测的机器学习:一项内部及时间验证研究。
JAMIA Open. 2020 Apr 11;3(2):252-260. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa006. eCollection 2020 Jul.
2
Real-World Integration of a Sepsis Deep Learning Technology Into Routine Clinical Care: Implementation Study.将脓毒症深度学习技术实际整合到常规临床护理中的实施研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jul 15;8(7):e15182. doi: 10.2196/15182.
3
Artificial Intelligence and Human Trust in Healthcare: Focus on Clinicians.
在医疗保健领域成功实施和采用人工智能的关键活动:构建医疗保健组织的流程框架。
Front Digit Health. 2025 May 16;7:1550459. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1550459. eCollection 2025.
4
Medical machine learning operations: a framework to facilitate clinical AI development and deployment in radiology.医学机器学习操作:促进放射学临床人工智能开发与部署的框架
Eur Radiol. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11654-6.
5
Building competency in artificial intelligence and bias mitigation for nurse scientists and aligned health researchers.培养护士科学家和相关健康研究人员在人工智能及减轻偏差方面的能力。
Nurs Outlook. 2025 May-Jun;73(3):102395. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102395. Epub 2025 May 2.
6
Designing Health Care Provider-Centered Emergency Department Interventions: Participatory Design Study.设计以医疗服务提供者为中心的急诊科干预措施:参与式设计研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 21;9:e68891. doi: 10.2196/68891.
7
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Care: A Systematic Review.人工智能在护理中的应用:一项系统综述。
J Nurs Manag. 2023 Jul 26;2023:3219127. doi: 10.1155/2023/3219127. eCollection 2023.
8
Bridging the Gap: A Mixed-Methods Study on Factors Influencing Breast Cancer Clinicians' Decisions to Use Clinical Prediction Models.弥合差距:一项关于影响乳腺癌临床医生使用临床预测模型决策因素的混合方法研究
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Mar 27;10(1):23814683251328377. doi: 10.1177/23814683251328377. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
9
The role of artificial intelligence in sepsis in the Emergency Department: a narrative review.人工智能在急诊科脓毒症中的作用:一项叙述性综述。
Ann Transl Med. 2025 Feb 28;13(1):4. doi: 10.21037/atm-24-150. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
10
User-Oriented Requirements for Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems in Sepsis: Protocol for a Multimethod Research Project.脓毒症中基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统的面向用户需求:多方法研究项目方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jan 30;14:e62704. doi: 10.2196/62704.
医疗保健中的人工智能与人类信任:聚焦临床医生
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 19;22(6):e15154. doi: 10.2196/15154.
4
Presenting machine learning model information to clinical end users with model facts labels.通过模型事实标签向临床终端用户展示机器学习模型信息。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Mar 23;3:41. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0253-3. eCollection 2020.
5
Artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry: Insights from a global physician survey.人工智能与精神病学的未来:全球医师调查的观点。
Artif Intell Med. 2020 Jan;102:101753. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101753. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
6
Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.机器学习在脓毒症预测中的应用:诊断试验准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Mar;46(3):383-400. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05872-y. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
7
Perceptions of artificial intelligence in healthcare: findings from a qualitative survey study among actors in France.医疗保健领域对人工智能的看法:法国利益相关者定性调查研究的结果。
J Transl Med. 2020 Jan 9;18(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-02204-y.
8
A Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Development, Implementation, and Impact on Clinical Practice.一种用于预测严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的机器学习算法:开发、实施及其对临床实践的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov;47(11):1485-1492. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003891.
9
Physician perspectives on integration of artificial intelligence into diagnostic pathology.医生对人工智能融入诊断病理学的看法。
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Apr 26;2:28. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0106-0. eCollection 2019.
10
Machine learning and medical education.机器学习与医学教育。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Sep 27;1:54. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0061-1. eCollection 2018.