Lu Zihua, Zhu Jiangtao, Chen Cheng
Yangzhou Polytechnic College, Department of Medical Science, 225009, Yangzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China.
Shanxi Provincial Integrated TCM and WM Hospital, Department of Nephrology, 030013, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, China.
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2025 Jan 31;58:e20240276. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0276en. eCollection 2025.
To compare the effectiveness of flipped classroom (FC) model with traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) model in the education of hemodialysis nurses.
Enrolled were 46 nurses who had received training from the hemodialysis center. These nurses were randomly assigned to FC or LBL groups, with 23 nurses in each group. FC group received the FC method, while LBL group was trained via the traditional LBL. After training, all nurses were examined for their theoretical knowledge, clinical practice skills and self-learning abilities. Furthermore, their satisfaction with the teaching mode was evaluated.
FC group outperformed LBL group in the mastery of theoretical knowledge. In FC group, the scores in objective, subjective and overall questions were significantly higher than those in LBL group. FC group demonstrated a superior capability in clinical practices. FC group exhibited a superior performance over the LBL group in self-learning ability. Additionally, FC group showed a higher degree of satisfaction with the training method.
FC method benefits nurses in mastering knowledge about hemodialysis. It enhances their clinical practice skills and self-learning capabilities, and brings them with a higher degree of satisfaction.
比较翻转课堂(FC)模式与传统讲授式学习(LBL)模式在血液透析护士教育中的效果。
招募了46名接受过血液透析中心培训的护士。这些护士被随机分为FC组或LBL组,每组23名护士。FC组采用FC方法,而LBL组通过传统的LBL进行培训。培训后,对所有护士进行理论知识、临床实践技能和自主学习能力的考核。此外,评估他们对教学模式的满意度。
FC组在理论知识掌握方面优于LBL组。在FC组中,客观题、主观题和总体问题的得分均显著高于LBL组。FC组在临床实践中表现出更强的能力。FC组在自主学习能力方面的表现优于LBL组。此外,FC组对培训方法的满意度更高。
FC方法有助于护士掌握血液透析知识。它提高了他们的临床实践技能和自主学习能力,并使他们获得更高的满意度。