Valentino Giovanna, Auchincloss Amy H, Acharya Binod, Tumas Natalia, López-Olmedo Nancy, Ortigoza Ana, de Menezes Mariana Carvalho, Kroker-Lobos María Fernanda, Nazzal Carolina
Programa de Doctorado, Escuela de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Departamento de Nutrición y Dietética, Escuela de Ciencias de la Salud, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
J Nutr Sci. 2025 Jan 15;14:e4. doi: 10.1017/jns.2024.93. eCollection 2025.
This cross-sectional ecological study described fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake variability across 144 cities in 8 Latin American countries and by city-level contextual variables. Data sources came from health surveys and census data (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, and Peru). Self-reported frequency of F&V intake was harmonised across surveys. Daily F&V intake was considered as consumption 7 d of the week. Using a mixed-effects model, we estimated age and sex-standardised city prevalences of daily F&V intake. Through Kruskal-Wallis tests, we compared city F&V daily intake prevalence by tertiles of city variables related to women's empowerment, socio-economics, and climate zones. The median prevalence for daily F&V intake was 55.7% across all cities (22.1% to 85.4%). Compared to the least favourable tertile of city conditions, F&V daily intake prevalence was higher for cities within the most favourable tertile of per capita GDP (median = 65.7% vs. 53.0%), labour force participation (median = 68.7% vs. 49.4%), women achievement-labour force score (median = 63.9% vs. 45.7%), and gender inequality index (median = 58.6% vs. 48.6%). Also, prevalences were higher for temperate climate zones than arid climate zones (median = 65.9% vs. 50.6%). No patterns were found by city level of educational attainment, city size, or population density. This study provides evidence that the prevalence of daily F&V intake varies across Latin American cities and may be favoured by higher socio-economic development, women's empowerment, and temperate weather. Interventions to improve F&V intake in Latin America should consider the behaviour disparities related to underlying local social, economic, and climate zone characteristics.
这项横断面生态研究描述了拉丁美洲8个国家144个城市的水果和蔬菜(F&V)摄入量差异以及城市层面的背景变量。数据来源包括健康调查和人口普查数据(阿根廷、巴西、智利、哥伦比亚、萨尔瓦多、危地马拉、墨西哥和秘鲁)。不同调查中自我报告的F&V摄入频率进行了统一。每日F&V摄入量被视为一周7天的消费量。使用混合效应模型,我们估计了每日F&V摄入量的年龄和性别标准化城市患病率。通过Kruskal-Wallis检验,我们按与妇女赋权、社会经济和气候区相关的城市变量三分位数比较了城市F&V每日摄入量患病率。所有城市每日F&V摄入量的中位数患病率为55.7%(22.1%至85.4%)。与城市条件最不利的三分位数相比,人均国内生产总值最有利三分位数内的城市F&V每日摄入量患病率更高(中位数 = 65.7%对53.0%),劳动力参与率(中位数 = 68.7%对49.4%),妇女成就-劳动力得分(中位数 = 63.9%对45.7%),以及性别不平等指数(中位数 = 58.6%对48.6%)。此外,温带气候区的患病率高于干旱气候区(中位数 = 65.9%对50.6%)。在城市教育程度、城市规模或人口密度方面未发现模式。这项研究提供了证据,表明拉丁美洲各城市每日F&V摄入量患病率存在差异,较高的社会经济发展、妇女赋权和温带气候可能有利于提高患病率。拉丁美洲改善F&V摄入量的干预措施应考虑与当地潜在社会、经济和气候区特征相关的行为差异。