Liu Guoxiang, Shang Zhaoming, Ning Ning, Li Juan, Sun Wenwu, Fan Yiwen, Guo Yiran, Ye Jiawei, Zhou Wenzhen, Qian Junwei, Ma Chaoping, Zhang Jiyuan, Jiang Xiaofei, Zhu Changqin, Mao Enqiang, Chen Mingquan, Gao Chengjin
Department of Emergency, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Emergency, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shock. 2025 Jul 1;64(1):56-64. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002562.
Background: Age and comorbidity significantly impact the prognosis of septic patients and inform treatment decisions. To provide clinicians with effective tools for identifying high-risk patients, this study assesses the predictive value of the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) and its simplified version, the quick ACCI (qACCI), for mortality in septic patients. Methods: This retrospective study included septic patients from four Chinese medical centers. The internal validation cohort comprised patients from Xinhua Hospital, Ruijin Hospital, and Huashan Hospital, while participants from Renji Hospital served as the external validation cohort. Machine learning models identified ACCI's feature importance. Restricted cubic spline regression and subgroup analysis assess the correlation between ACCI and mortality risk. The qACCI, derived from the ACCI components, was also evaluated for predictive reliability. Results: A total of 3,287 septic patients were included: 2,974 in the internal cohort (mean age 67.96 years; 37.5% male) and 313 in the external cohort (mean age 67.90 years; 48.2% male). Machine learning models identified ACCI as a key predictor of in-hospital mortality. A linear correlation was confirmed between ACCI and risks of in-hospital, 30-day, and ICU mortality. Sensitivity analysis revealed consistent results across subgroups, demonstrating significantly higher mortality risks in the moderate- (hazard ratio [HR] 2.18, 95% CI 1.77-2.70) and high-ACCI (HR 3.72, 95% CI 2.99-4.65) groups compared to the low-ACCI group (HR 1, reference). The ACCI achieved an AUC of 0.788 for in-hospital mortality, outperforming the SOFA in gastrointestinal (0.831 vs. 0.794) and central nervous system infections (0.803 vs. 0.739). The qACCI showed moderate predictive performance in both the internal (AUC, 0.734) and external (AUC, 0.758) cohorts. Conclusions: As composite indicators of age and comorbidity, ACCI and qACCI provide valuable and reliable tools for clinicians to identify high-risk patients early.
年龄和合并症显著影响脓毒症患者的预后,并为治疗决策提供依据。为了为临床医生提供识别高危患者的有效工具,本研究评估了年龄调整后的查尔森合并症指数(ACCI)及其简化版本快速ACCI(qACCI)对脓毒症患者死亡率的预测价值。方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了来自中国四个医疗中心的脓毒症患者。内部验证队列包括新华医院、瑞金医院和华山医院的患者,而仁济医院的参与者作为外部验证队列。机器学习模型确定了ACCI的特征重要性。限制立方样条回归和亚组分析评估了ACCI与死亡风险之间的相关性。还对源自ACCI成分的qACCI的预测可靠性进行了评估。结果:共纳入3287例脓毒症患者:内部队列2974例(平均年龄67.96岁;男性占37.5%),外部队列313例(平均年龄67.90岁;男性占48.2%)。机器学习模型确定ACCI是院内死亡率的关键预测指标。证实ACCI与院内、30天和ICU死亡率风险之间存在线性相关性。敏感性分析显示各亚组结果一致,与低ACCI组(HR=1,参照)相比,中度ACCI组(风险比[HR]2.18,95%置信区间1.77-2.70)和高ACCI组(HR 3.72,95%置信区间2.99-4.65)的死亡风险显著更高。ACCI对院内死亡率的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.788,在胃肠道感染(0.831对0.794)和中枢神经系统感染(0.803对0.739)方面优于序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)。qACCI在内部队列(AUC为0.734)和外部队列(AUC为0.758)中均显示出中等预测性能。结论:作为年龄和合并症的综合指标,ACCI和qACCI为临床医生早期识别高危患者提供了有价值且可靠的工具。