Reguiai Ziad, Ghislain Pierre-Dominique, Moulin Pierre, Baudier Emilie, Schepkens Corentin, Sintès Maxime, Boyé Thierry
Department of Dermatology, Polyclinique Courlancy-Bezannes, Reims, France.
Polyclinique Reims-Bezannes, 89 Rue Victor De Broglie, 51430, Bezannes, France.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Mar;15(3):707-719. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01356-8. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
The effectiveness of psoriasis treatment is assessed by standardized tools such as the Dermatology life Quality Index (DLQI) and Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI). However, discrepancies between patients and physicians in terms of treatment success and goals, along with the growing importance of shared decision-making in healthcare, highlight the need for tools specifically designed for psoriasis. Such tools can enhance communication between patients and physicians, encouraging shared decision-making and improving the assessment of patient treatment expectations.
Comparison of the new PSO-TARGET grid, which consists of 12 therapeutic goals evenly distributed across 4 major components commonly used in quality of life (QoL) studies for chronic diseases, with DLQI as a standard tool, was utilized.
A total of 143 adult patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and treated with brodalumab were included. On the basis of a blind assessment, dermatologists were not able to identify the patients' chosen PSO-TARGET goal in more than 50% of cases. The comparison after 12/16 weeks of treatment revealed some discrepancies between the two QoL tools. Compared with the rest of the population, the patients who achieved their PSO-TARGET goal, but still reported a DLQI > 1, had higher baseline PASI scores (18.6 versus 14.8; p = 0.067), higher DLQI scores (14.1 versus 10.1; p = 0.004), and a higher number of hard-to-treat locations (median of 2 versus 1; p = 0.004). In addition, patients who had not reached their PSO-TARGET goal but reported a DLQI ≤ 1, all had psoriasis on the scalp at the baseline and were generally younger (median of 31 versus 52 years, p = 0.001).
This study highlights the importance of considering patient characteristics of those with psoriasis and perspectives when evaluating treatment outcomes. Using shared decision-making tools such as the PSO-TARGET grid can improve communication and understanding between dermatologists and patients.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04765332.
银屑病治疗效果通过标准化工具进行评估,如皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)和银屑病面积严重程度指数(PASI)。然而,患者与医生在治疗成功与否及目标方面存在差异,且共同决策在医疗保健中的重要性日益凸显,这突出表明需要专门为银屑病设计的工具。此类工具可加强患者与医生之间的沟通,促进共同决策,并改善对患者治疗期望的评估。
将新的PSO-TARGET网格(由12个治疗目标均匀分布在慢性病生活质量(QoL)研究常用的4个主要组成部分中)与作为标准工具的DLQI进行比较。
共纳入143例接受布罗达单抗治疗的中度至重度成年银屑病患者。基于盲法评估,皮肤科医生在超过50%的病例中无法识别患者选择的PSO-TARGET目标。治疗12/16周后的比较显示两种生活质量工具之间存在一些差异。与其他人群相比,实现了PSO-TARGET目标但仍报告DLQI>1的患者,基线PASI评分更高(18.6对14.8;p = 0.067),DLQI评分更高(14.1对10.1;p = 0.004),且难治部位数量更多(中位数为2对1;p = 0.004)。此外,未达到PSO-TARGET目标但报告DLQI≤1的患者,基线时头皮均有银屑病,且总体更年轻(中位数为31岁对52岁,p = 0.001)。
本研究强调了在评估治疗结果时考虑银屑病患者特征和观点的重要性。使用PSO-TARGET网格等共同决策工具可改善皮肤科医生与患者之间的沟通与理解。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符,NCT04765332。