Stavropoulos Theodoros, Zaras Nikolaos, Kelekian Georgia-Kassandra, Mpampoulis Thomas, Avloniti Alexandra, Chatzinikolaou Athanasios, Terzis Gerasimos
Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, School of Physical Education, Sport Science and Occupational Therapy, Democritus University of Thrace, University Campus, 69100 Komotini, Greece.
Department of Life Sciences, School of Life and Health Sciences, University of Nicosia, 24005 Nicosia, Cyprus.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Jan 30;10(1):52. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10010052.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of a priming training session with either a light or heavy load snatch and clean pulls on weightlifting performance.
Twelve well-trained weightlifters (seven males and five females) participated in the study. The athletes followed a counterbalanced study design comparing three treatments, including a day of rest (control) and two priming sessions involving two different weightlifting derivatives-the snatch and the clean pulls-which were performed either with 80% of the one-repetition maximum (1-RM) (LP) or with 110% of the 1-RM (HP). Twenty-four hours later, the 1-RM strength test for the snatch and clean and jerk, as well as the barbell kinematic characteristics at 100% of the 1-RM in the snatch and clean and jerk, were measured. The rate of perceived exertion (RPE) was measured following the priming sessions.
Performance in snatch remained unchanged following the LP and HP. However, performance in the clean and jerk increased significantly by 3.1% following the HP compared to the control. No significant differences were observed in barbell kinematics. The RPE was significantly higher for HP compared to LP.
These results suggest that an HP performed 24 h prior to the 1-RM evaluation in weightlifting may have significantly increased performance in the clean and jerk. These changes may not be explained by barbell kinematics.
背景/目的：本研究旨在调查进行一次轻负荷或重负荷抓举与挺举预训练对举重成绩的影响。
12名训练有素的举重运动员（7名男性和5名女性）参与了本研究。运动员采用平衡研究设计，比较三种处理方式，包括一天的休息（对照）和两次预训练，这两次预训练涉及两种不同的举重衍生动作——抓举和挺举，分别采用一次最大重复量（1-RM）的80%（LP）或1-RM的110%（HP）进行。24小时后，测量抓举、挺举的1-RM力量测试以及抓举和挺举中1-RM的100%时杠铃的运动学特征。在预训练后测量主观用力程度（RPE）。
LP和HP后抓举成绩保持不变。然而，与对照组相比，HP后挺举成绩显著提高了3.1%。杠铃运动学方面未观察到显著差异。HP的RPE显著高于LP。
这些结果表明，在举重1-RM评估前24小时进行的HP可能会显著提高挺举成绩。这些变化可能无法用杠铃运动学来解释。
