• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开角型青光眼患者对比敏感度与美国国立眼科研究所视觉功能问卷(NEI VFQ-25)Rasch评分之间的相关性:一项横断面研究。

Correlation between contrast sensitivity and national eye institute visual function questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) Rasch scores in patients with open-angle glaucoma: A cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Nakano Rieko, Igarashi Ryoko, Akagi Tadamichi, Sakaue Yuta, Iikawa Ryu, Tazawa Ayako, Kamada Kinuko, Arimatsu Mao, Togano Tetsuya, Fukuchi Takeo

机构信息

Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.

Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital, Nagaoka, Niigata, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-03928-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12886-025-03928-w
PMID:40001099
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11863498/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We examined the relationship between contrast sensitivity (CS) and visual field stage/severity in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG), and correlated CS with Quality of Vision (QOV) scores.

METHODS

CS was measured under photopic (100 cd) and mesopic (10 cd) conditions in 218 eyes of 109 patients with OAG aged < 60 years. The glaucoma stages were divided into four groups according to the mean deviation (MD) of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 24 - 2 or 10 - 2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) standard, and their relationship with CS was examined.

RESULTS

The results of the Japanese version of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) in 79 patients were converted into Rasch scores and correlated with CS. Both HFA24-2 and 10 - 2 showed statistically significant improvements in all items except 10.2 cycles per degree (cpd) under mesopic conditions where CS decreased significantly (p < 0.05). Correlations between CS and NEI VFQ-25 Rasch scores were stronger in the worse eye (WE) at HFA24-2, 10 - 2, and foveal sensitivity thresholds. The measurement results strongly correlated under photopic conditions. Comparing the correlations at HFA24-2, 10 - 2, and foveal sensitivity thresholds, the correlation was strongest at the foveal sensitivity threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

CS declines with progression in the visual field stage or severity. QOV score tends to decreases with a decline in CS.

摘要

背景

我们研究了开角型青光眼(OAG)患者的对比敏感度(CS)与视野阶段/严重程度之间的关系,并将CS与视觉质量(QOV)评分进行了相关性分析。

方法

对109例年龄小于60岁的OAG患者的218只眼在明视(100 cd)和中视(10 cd)条件下测量CS。根据 Humphrey视野分析仪(HFA)24-2或10-2瑞典交互式阈值算法(SITA)标准的平均偏差(MD)将青光眼阶段分为四组,并研究其与CS的关系。

结果

将79例患者的日本版国立眼科研究所视觉功能问卷-25(NEI VFQ-25)结果转换为Rasch评分并与CS进行相关性分析。HFA24-2和10-2在除中视条件下每度10.2周/度(cpd)外的所有项目中均显示出统计学上的显著改善,此时CS显著下降(p<0.05)。在HFA24-2、10-2和中央凹敏感度阈值下,较差眼(WE)的CS与NEI VFQ-25 Rasch评分之间的相关性更强。在明视条件下测量结果高度相关。比较HFA24-2、10-2和中央凹敏感度阈值下的相关性,在中央凹敏感度阈值下相关性最强。

结论

CS随着视野阶段或严重程度的进展而下降。QOV评分倾向于随着CS的下降而降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f756/11863498/ce99d0b594cd/12886_2025_3928_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f756/11863498/ce99d0b594cd/12886_2025_3928_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f756/11863498/ce99d0b594cd/12886_2025_3928_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Correlation between contrast sensitivity and national eye institute visual function questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) Rasch scores in patients with open-angle glaucoma: A cross-sectional study.开角型青光眼患者对比敏感度与美国国立眼科研究所视觉功能问卷(NEI VFQ-25)Rasch评分之间的相关性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-03928-w.
2
Association of Quality of Life and Visual Function in Glaucoma With Tests of Structure and Function.青光眼患者生活质量与视觉功能的关联及其结构和功能检测
J Glaucoma. 2025 Feb 1;34(2):95-102. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002495. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
3
Measuring Contrast Sensitivity in Specific Areas of Vision - A Meaningful Way to Assess Quality of Life and Ability to Perform Daily Activities in Glaucoma.测量特定视觉区域的对比敏感度——评估青光眼患者生活质量和日常活动能力的有效方法。
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2019 Oct;26(5):301-310. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2019.1616773. Epub 2019 May 22.
4
Evaluation of the relationship between quality of vision and the visual function index in Japanese glaucoma patients.评估日本青光眼患者的视力质量与视觉功能指数之间的关系。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Nov;249(11):1721-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-011-1779-5. Epub 2011 Aug 20.
5
Longitudinal changes in quality of life and rates of progressive visual field loss in glaucoma patients.青光眼患者生活质量的纵向变化及进行性视野缺损率
Ophthalmology. 2015 Feb;122(2):293-301. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
6
Relationships Between Measures of the Ability to Perform Vision-Related Activities, Vision-Related Quality of Life, and Clinical Findings in Patients With Glaucoma.青光眼患者视功能相关活动能力、视功能相关生活质量测量指标与临床检查结果的关系。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;133(12):1377-85. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.3426.
7
Impact of visual field loss on health-related quality of life in glaucoma: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.视野缺损对青光眼患者健康相关生活质量的影响:洛杉矶拉丁裔眼病研究
Ophthalmology. 2008 Jun;115(6):941-948.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.08.037. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
8
Visual impairment and vision-related quality of life in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial after 20 years of follow-up.早期显性青光眼试验20年随访后的视力损害与视力相关生活质量
Acta Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;93(8):745-52. doi: 10.1111/aos.12839. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
9
Associations of subjective and objective clinical outcomes of visual functions with quality of life in Chinese glaucoma patients: a cross-sectional study.中国青光眼患者视觉功能的主观和客观临床结局与生活质量的相关性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul 31;19(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1176-0.
10
Optical Quality Assessed by Optical Quality Analysis System in Chinese Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients and Its Correlations with Psychological Disturbances and Vision-Related Quality of Life.光学质量分析系统评估的中国原发性开角型青光眼患者的光学质量及其与心理困扰和与视觉相关的生活质量的相关性。
Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(1):15-21. doi: 10.1159/000507220. Epub 2020 Mar 16.

本文引用的文献

1
The Japan Glaucoma Society guidelines for glaucoma 5th edition.《日本青光眼学会青光眼指南第 5 版》。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar;67(2):189-254. doi: 10.1007/s10384-022-00970-9. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
2
European Glaucoma Society Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 5th Edition.欧洲青光眼学会青光眼术语和指南,第 5 版。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun;105(Suppl 1):1-169. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-egsguidelines.
3
Spaeth/Richman Contrast Sensitivity in Staging Glaucoma.施佩思/里奇曼对比敏感度在青光眼分期中的应用。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Dec 22;9(13):39. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.13.39. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
Vision Parameters Most Important to Functionality in Glaucoma.与青光眼功能性最相关的视功能参数。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019 Nov 1;60(14):4556-4563. doi: 10.1167/iovs.19-28023.
5
Contrast Sensitivity and Glaucoma.对比敏感度与青光眼。
J Glaucoma. 2020 Jan;29(1):71-75. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001379.
6
Associations of subjective and objective clinical outcomes of visual functions with quality of life in Chinese glaucoma patients: a cross-sectional study.中国青光眼患者视觉功能的主观和客观临床结局与生活质量的相关性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul 31;19(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1176-0.
7
Spatial contrast sensitivity from star- to sunlight in healthy subjects and patients with glaucoma.健康受试者和青光眼患者从星光到日光的空间对比敏感度。
Vision Res. 2019 May;158:31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
8
Vision-related Performance and Quality of Life of Patients With Rapid Glaucoma Progression.快速进展性青光眼患者的视力相关表现和生活质量。
J Glaucoma. 2019 Mar;28(3):216-222. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001179.
9
Visual Performance as a Function of Luminance in Glaucoma: The De Vries-Rose, Weber's, and Ferry-Porter's Law.青光眼的明度视觉表现:德弗里斯-罗斯、韦伯和费里-波特定律。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Jul 2;59(8):3416-3423. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-22497.
10
Assessment of contrast sensitivity by Spaeth Richman Contrast Sensitivity Test and Pelli Robson Chart Test in patients with varying severity of glaucoma.应用 Spaeth Richman 对比敏感度试验和 Pelli Robson 图表试验评估不同严重程度青光眼患者的对比敏感度。
Eye (Lond). 2018 Aug;32(8):1392-1400. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0099-y. Epub 2018 May 14.