• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种快速决策的图像可计算模型。

An image-computable model of speeded decision-making.

作者信息

Jaffe Paul I, Santiago-Reyes Gustavo X, Schafer Robert J, Bissett Patrick G, Poldrack Russell A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.

Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.

出版信息

Elife. 2025 Feb 28;13:RP98351. doi: 10.7554/eLife.98351.

DOI:10.7554/eLife.98351
PMID:40019474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11870652/
Abstract

Evidence accumulation models (EAMs) are the dominant framework for modeling response time (RT) data from speeded decision-making tasks. While providing a good quantitative description of RT data in terms of abstract perceptual representations, EAMs do not explain how the visual system extracts these representations in the first place. To address this limitation, we introduce the visual accumulator model (VAM), in which convolutional neural network models of visual processing and traditional EAMs are jointly fitted to trial-level RTs and raw (pixel-space) visual stimuli from individual subjects in a unified Bayesian framework. Models fitted to large-scale cognitive training data from a stylized flanker task captured individual differences in congruency effects, RTs, and accuracy. We find evidence that the selection of task-relevant information occurs through the orthogonalization of relevant and irrelevant representations, demonstrating how our framework can be used to relate visual representations to behavioral outputs. Together, our work provides a probabilistic framework for both constraining neural network models of vision with behavioral data and studying how the visual system extracts representations that guide decisions.

摘要

证据积累模型(EAMs)是对快速决策任务中的反应时间(RT)数据进行建模的主导框架。虽然EAMs在抽象感知表征方面对RT数据提供了很好的定量描述,但它们首先并没有解释视觉系统是如何提取这些表征的。为了解决这一局限性,我们引入了视觉累加器模型(VAM),在该模型中,视觉处理的卷积神经网络模型和传统的EAMs在一个统一的贝叶斯框架中联合拟合个体受试者的试验级RT和原始(像素空间)视觉刺激。拟合来自一个程式化侧翼任务的大规模认知训练数据的模型捕捉了一致性效应、RT和准确性方面的个体差异。我们发现有证据表明,任务相关信息的选择是通过相关和不相关表征的正交化来实现的,这表明了我们的框架如何能够用于将视觉表征与行为输出联系起来。总之,我们的工作为用行为数据约束视觉神经网络模型以及研究视觉系统如何提取指导决策的表征提供了一个概率框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/5fe001bf95bb/elife-98351-fig6-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/3e1837c2a644/elife-98351-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/486b52c4446c/elife-98351-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/4569c6aa0844/elife-98351-fig2-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/ef141ad28758/elife-98351-fig2-figsupp2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/3bdf3d3a460a/elife-98351-fig2-figsupp3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/0651da9d0e8c/elife-98351-fig2-figsupp4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/3f1baffb9630/elife-98351-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/b830410664e4/elife-98351-fig3-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/d4c0b1ead135/elife-98351-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/db4f2fbf8fa9/elife-98351-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/7652bece9157/elife-98351-fig5-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/65a3f052efe0/elife-98351-fig5-figsupp2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/e088242096b1/elife-98351-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/5fe001bf95bb/elife-98351-fig6-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/3e1837c2a644/elife-98351-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/486b52c4446c/elife-98351-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/4569c6aa0844/elife-98351-fig2-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/ef141ad28758/elife-98351-fig2-figsupp2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/3bdf3d3a460a/elife-98351-fig2-figsupp3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/0651da9d0e8c/elife-98351-fig2-figsupp4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/3f1baffb9630/elife-98351-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/b830410664e4/elife-98351-fig3-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/d4c0b1ead135/elife-98351-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/db4f2fbf8fa9/elife-98351-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/7652bece9157/elife-98351-fig5-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/65a3f052efe0/elife-98351-fig5-figsupp2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/e088242096b1/elife-98351-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a122/11870652/5fe001bf95bb/elife-98351-fig6-figsupp1.jpg

相似文献

1
An image-computable model of speeded decision-making.一种快速决策的图像可计算模型。
Elife. 2025 Feb 28;13:RP98351. doi: 10.7554/eLife.98351.
2
The neural network RTNet exhibits the signatures of human perceptual decision-making.神经网络 RTNet 表现出人类感知决策的特征。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Sep;8(9):1752-1770. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01914-8. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
3
Serial Dependence in Perceptual Decisions Is Reflected in Activity Patterns in Primary Visual Cortex.感知决策中的序列依赖性反映在初级视觉皮层的活动模式中。
J Neurosci. 2016 Jun 8;36(23):6186-92. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4390-15.2016.
4
Visual Evidence Accumulation Guides Decision-Making in Unrestrained Mice.直观证据积累指导非束缚小鼠的决策。
J Neurosci. 2018 Nov 21;38(47):10143-10155. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3478-17.2018. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
5
Perceptual decisions formed by accumulation of audiovisual evidence in prefrontal cortex.前额叶皮层中视听证据积累形成的知觉决策。
J Neurosci. 2010 May 26;30(21):7434-46. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0455-10.2010.
6
Neuronal adaptation effects in decision making.决策中的神经元适应效应。
J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 5;31(1):234-46. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2757-10.2011.
7
Implicit Neurofeedback Training of Feature-Based Attention Promotes Biased Sensory Processing during Integrative Decision-Making.基于特征的注意的内隐神经反馈训练促进了综合决策过程中的偏向性感觉处理。
J Neurosci. 2021 Sep 29;41(39):8233-8248. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0243-21.2021. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
8
Neurally constrained modeling of perceptual decision making.基于神经约束的感知决策建模。
Psychol Rev. 2010 Oct;117(4):1113-43. doi: 10.1037/a0020311.
9
Antagonistic Interactions Between Microsaccades and Evidence Accumulation Processes During Decision Formation.在决策形成过程中,微扫视与证据积累过程之间的拮抗相互作用。
J Neurosci. 2018 Feb 28;38(9):2163-2176. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2340-17.2018. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
10
Evidence accumulation during perceptual decision-making is sensitive to the dynamics of attentional selection.在知觉决策过程中,证据积累对注意选择的动态变化敏感。
Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 15;220:117093. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117093. Epub 2020 Jun 26.

本文引用的文献

1
The neural network RTNet exhibits the signatures of human perceptual decision-making.神经网络 RTNet 表现出人类感知决策的特征。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Sep;8(9):1752-1770. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01914-8. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
2
Orthogonal neural encoding of targets and distractors supports multivariate cognitive control.目标和干扰物的正交神经编码支持多元认知控制。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 May;8(5):945-961. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01826-7. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
3
Harmonizing the object recognition strategies of deep neural networks with humans.
使深度神经网络的目标识别策略与人类相协调。
Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2022 Dec;35:9432-9446.
4
Modelling human behaviour in cognitive tasks with latent dynamical systems.用潜在动力系统对认知任务中的人类行为进行建模。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jun;7(6):986-1000. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01510-8. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
5
Extracting Low-Dimensional Psychological Representations from Convolutional Neural Networks.从卷积神经网络中提取低维心理表征
Cogn Sci. 2023 Jan;47(1):e13226. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13226.
6
Deep problems with neural network models of human vision.人类视觉神经网络模型的深层问题。
Behav Brain Sci. 2022 Dec 1;46:e385. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22002813.
7
Feature blindness: A challenge for understanding and modelling visual object recognition.特征失明:理解和建模视觉物体识别的挑战。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 May 13;18(5):e1009572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009572. eCollection 2022 May.
8
Efficient selection between hierarchical cognitive models: Cross-validation with variational Bayes.分层认知模型的高效选择:变分贝叶斯交叉验证。
Psychol Methods. 2024 Feb;29(1):219-241. doi: 10.1037/met0000458. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
9
Geometry of sequence working memory in macaque prefrontal cortex.灵长类动物前额叶皮层中序列工作记忆的几何结构。
Science. 2022 Feb 11;375(6581):632-639. doi: 10.1126/science.abm0204. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
10
Orthogonal representations for robust context-dependent task performance in brains and neural networks.大脑和神经网络中鲁棒上下文相关任务性能的正交表示。
Neuron. 2022 Apr 6;110(7):1258-1270.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Jan 31.