Suppr超能文献

细菌学和血清学在蜂窝织炎和丹毒诊断中的价值。

The value of bacteriology and serology in the diagnosis of cellulitis and erysipelas.

作者信息

Leppard B J, Seal D V, Colman G, Hallas G

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 1985 May;112(5):559-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1985.tb15264.x.

Abstract

Patients diagnosed as suffering from erysipelas or cellulitis were subjected to bacteriological and serological investigations. The serological tests used included the anti-streptolysin O reaction (ASO), the anti-deoxyribonuclease B test (ADB) and the anti-hyaluronidase tests (AHT) that are specific both for the group A streptococcus (Streptococcus pyogenes) and for the human pyogenic streptococci of group C or group G. Antibody tests to the alpha-lysin and the nuclease of Staphylococcus aureus were also employed. Conventional bacteriological culture methods were used plus needle aspiration of injected saline in most patients with erysipelas, but recognized pathogens were isolated in only 42% of cases. Our results indicate the limitations of these tests for making initial diagnoses and deciding treatment. Serial serological testing was very successful in differentiating cellulitis due to group A, C or G haemolytic streptococci, or occasionally Staphylococcus aureus, but was positive in only 40% of cases of erysipelas.

摘要

被诊断患有丹毒或蜂窝织炎的患者接受了细菌学和血清学检查。所使用的血清学检测包括抗链球菌溶血素O反应(ASO)、抗脱氧核糖核酸酶B检测(ADB)和抗透明质酸酶检测(AHT),这些检测对A组链球菌(化脓性链球菌)以及C组或G组人类化脓性链球菌均具有特异性。还采用了针对金黄色葡萄球菌α-溶血素和核酸酶的抗体检测。大多数丹毒患者采用了传统细菌培养方法并加用注射生理盐水的针吸术,但仅42%的病例分离出了公认的病原体。我们的结果表明这些检测在进行初步诊断和决定治疗方面存在局限性。系列血清学检测在鉴别由A、C或G组溶血性链球菌或偶尔由金黄色葡萄球菌引起的蜂窝织炎方面非常成功,但仅40%的丹毒病例呈阳性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验