• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

协同质子电子转移还是氢原子转移?一种在模型体系中区分这些机制的明确策略。

Concerted proton electron transfer or hydrogen atom transfer? an unequivocal strategy to discriminate these mechanisms in model systems.

作者信息

Zeppilli Davide, Orian Laura

机构信息

Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Università degli Studi di Padova, Via Marzolo 1, 35131 Padova, Italy.

Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro (INFN-LNL), 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy.

出版信息

Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2025 Mar 19;27(12):6312-6324. doi: 10.1039/d5cp00690b.

DOI:10.1039/d5cp00690b
PMID:40066782
Abstract

Concerted proton electron transfer (CPET) and hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) are two important mechanisms in many fields of chemistry, which are characterized by the transfer of one proton and one electron. The distinction between these mechanisms may be challenging in several reactions; thus, different computational methods have been developed for this purpose. In this work, we present a computational strategy to distinguish the two mechanisms, rationalizing the factors controlling the reactivity in four different model reactions. Fist, the transition state SOMO (singly occupied molecular orbital) is visualized, presenting all the limits and ambiguities of this analysis. Then, the electron flow along the reaction path is evaluated through the intrinsic bond orbitals (IBOs); this analysis allows to describe correctly the mechanism of each reaction in agreement with previous studies. Furthermore, some structural modifications are applied to the transition state of each system and the energetic differences are rationalized in the framework of the activation strain analysis to understand the geometrical and electronic factors governing the reactivity and the selection of CPET or HAT mechanism. Lastly, the effect of the donor-acceptor distance is evaluated. It emerges that a combined computational analysis is crucial to understand not only the distinction between the two mechanisms, but also the molecular reasons why one mechanism is operative in a specific reaction.

摘要

协同质子电子转移(CPET)和氢原子转移(HAT)是化学诸多领域中的两种重要机制,其特征在于一个质子和一个电子的转移。在若干反应中区分这些机制可能具有挑战性;因此,为此已开发出不同的计算方法。在这项工作中,我们提出一种计算策略来区分这两种机制,阐明控制四个不同模型反应中反应活性的因素。首先,对过渡态单占据分子轨道(SOMO)进行可视化,呈现这种分析的所有局限性和模糊性。然后,通过本征键轨道(IBO)评估沿反应路径的电子流动;该分析能够与先前研究一致地正确描述每个反应的机制。此外,对每个体系的过渡态进行一些结构修饰,并在活化应变分析框架内对能量差异进行阐释,以了解控制反应活性以及CPET或HAT机制选择的几何和电子因素。最后,评估供体 - 受体距离的影响。结果表明,综合计算分析对于不仅理解这两种机制之间的区别,而且理解一种机制在特定反应中起作用的分子原因至关重要。

相似文献

1
Concerted proton electron transfer or hydrogen atom transfer? an unequivocal strategy to discriminate these mechanisms in model systems.协同质子电子转移还是氢原子转移?一种在模型体系中区分这些机制的明确策略。
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2025 Mar 19;27(12):6312-6324. doi: 10.1039/d5cp00690b.
2
The Third Dimension of a More O'Ferrall-Jencks Diagram for Hydrogen Atom Transfer in the Isoelectronic Hydrogen Exchange Reactions of (PhX)(2)H(•) with X = O, NH, and CH(2).(PhX)₂H•(X = O、NH、CH₂)等电子氢交换反应中氢原子转移的更具O'Ferrall-Jencks图的三维分析
J Chem Theory Comput. 2012 Nov 13;8(11):4347-4358. doi: 10.1021/ct3004595. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
3
A Continuum of Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Reactivity.质子耦合电子转移反应性的连续统。
Acc Chem Res. 2018 Oct 16;51(10):2391-2399. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00319. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
4
Separating Proton and Electron Transfer Effects in Three-Component Concerted Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Reactions. 三重协同质子耦合电子转移反应中质子转移和电子转移效应的分离。
J Am Chem Soc. 2017 Aug 2;139(30):10312-10319. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b03562. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
5
Hydrogen Atom Transfer Reactions of Mononuclear Nonheme Metal-Oxygen Intermediates.单核非血红素金属-氧中间体的氢原子转移反应
Acc Chem Res. 2018 Sep 18;51(9):2014-2022. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00299. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
6
Hydrogen-bond relays in concerted proton-electron transfers.协同质子-电子转移中的氢键传递。
Acc Chem Res. 2012 Mar 20;45(3):372-81. doi: 10.1021/ar200132f. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
7
Breaking bonds with electrons and protons. Models and examples.打破电子和质子的键。模型和例子。
Acc Chem Res. 2014 Jan 21;47(1):271-80. doi: 10.1021/ar4001444. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
8
cPCET versus HAT: A Direct Theoretical Method for Distinguishing X-H Bond-Activation Mechanisms.化学压力耦合电子转移(cPCET)与氢原子转移(HAT):区分X-H键活化机制的直接理论方法。
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2018 Sep 10;57(37):11913-11917. doi: 10.1002/anie.201805511. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
9
Concerted proton-electron transfers: electrochemical and related approaches.协同质子-电子转移:电化学及相关方法。
Acc Chem Res. 2010 Jul 20;43(7):1019-29. doi: 10.1021/ar9002812.
10
Proton-coupled electron transfer with photoexcited metal complexes.质子耦合电子转移与光激发金属配合物。
Acc Chem Res. 2013 Jul 16;46(7):1517-26. doi: 10.1021/ar300289x. Epub 2013 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Chalcogen in the ROS Scavenging Mechanism of Model Phenyl Compounds.硫族元素在模型苯基化合物的活性氧清除机制中的作用。
Molecules. 2025 Mar 21;30(7):1408. doi: 10.3390/molecules30071408.