Zeppilli Davide, Orian Laura
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Università degli Studi di Padova, Via Marzolo 1, 35131 Padova, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro (INFN-LNL), 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2025 Mar 19;27(12):6312-6324. doi: 10.1039/d5cp00690b.
Concerted proton electron transfer (CPET) and hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) are two important mechanisms in many fields of chemistry, which are characterized by the transfer of one proton and one electron. The distinction between these mechanisms may be challenging in several reactions; thus, different computational methods have been developed for this purpose. In this work, we present a computational strategy to distinguish the two mechanisms, rationalizing the factors controlling the reactivity in four different model reactions. Fist, the transition state SOMO (singly occupied molecular orbital) is visualized, presenting all the limits and ambiguities of this analysis. Then, the electron flow along the reaction path is evaluated through the intrinsic bond orbitals (IBOs); this analysis allows to describe correctly the mechanism of each reaction in agreement with previous studies. Furthermore, some structural modifications are applied to the transition state of each system and the energetic differences are rationalized in the framework of the activation strain analysis to understand the geometrical and electronic factors governing the reactivity and the selection of CPET or HAT mechanism. Lastly, the effect of the donor-acceptor distance is evaluated. It emerges that a combined computational analysis is crucial to understand not only the distinction between the two mechanisms, but also the molecular reasons why one mechanism is operative in a specific reaction.
协同质子电子转移(CPET)和氢原子转移(HAT)是化学诸多领域中的两种重要机制,其特征在于一个质子和一个电子的转移。在若干反应中区分这些机制可能具有挑战性;因此,为此已开发出不同的计算方法。在这项工作中,我们提出一种计算策略来区分这两种机制,阐明控制四个不同模型反应中反应活性的因素。首先,对过渡态单占据分子轨道(SOMO)进行可视化,呈现这种分析的所有局限性和模糊性。然后,通过本征键轨道(IBO)评估沿反应路径的电子流动;该分析能够与先前研究一致地正确描述每个反应的机制。此外,对每个体系的过渡态进行一些结构修饰,并在活化应变分析框架内对能量差异进行阐释,以了解控制反应活性以及CPET或HAT机制选择的几何和电子因素。最后,评估供体 - 受体距离的影响。结果表明,综合计算分析对于不仅理解这两种机制之间的区别,而且理解一种机制在特定反应中起作用的分子原因至关重要。