Department of Chemistry , Yale University , New Haven , Connecticut 06520-8107 , United States.
Acc Chem Res. 2018 Oct 16;51(10):2391-2399. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00319. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
Proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) covers a wide range of reactions involving the transfer(s) of electrons and protons. The best-known PCET reaction, hydrogen atom transfer (HAT), has been studied in detail for more than a century. HAT is generally described as the concerted transfer of a hydrogen atom (H ≡ H + e) from one group to another, Y + H-X → Y-H + X, but a strict definition of HAT has been difficult to establish. Distinctions are more challenging when the transfer of "H" involves e and H that transfer to/from spatially distinct sites or even completely separate reagents (multiple-site concerted proton-electron transfer, MS-CPET). MS-CPET reactivity is increasingly proposed in biological and synthetic contexts, and some reactions typically described as HAT more resemble MS-CPET. Despite that HAT and MS-CPET reactions "look different," we argue here that these reactions lie on a reactivity continuum, and that they are governed by many of the same key parameters. This Account walks the reader across this PCET reactivity continuum, using a series of studies to show the strong similarities of reactions that move protons and electrons in seemingly different ways. To prepare for our stroll, we describe the thermochemical and kinetic frameworks for HAT and MS-CPET. The driving force for a solution HAT reaction is most easily discussed as the difference in the bond dissociation free energies (BDFEs) of the reactants and products. BDFEs can be analyzed as sums of electron and proton transfer steps and can therefore be obtained from p K and E° values. Even though MS-CPET reactions do not make and break H-X bonds in the same way as HAT, the same thermochemical description can be used with the introduction of an effective BDFE (BDFE). The BDFE of a reductant/acid pair is the free energy of that pair to form H, which can be obtained from p K and E° values in an analogous fashion to a standard BDFE. When the PCET thermochemistry is known, HAT and PCET rate constants can be understood and often predicted using linear free energy relationships (the Brønsted catalysis law) and Marcus theory type approaches. After this background, we walk the reader through a continuum of PCET reactivity. Our journey begins with a study of metal-mediated HAT from hydrocarbon substrates to a metal-oxo complex and travels to the MS-CPET end of the reactivity spectrum, involving the transfer of H and e from the hydroxylamine TEMPOH to two completely separate molecules. These examples, and those in between, are all analyzed within the same thermodynamic and kinetic framework. A description of the first examples of MS-CPET with C-H bonds uses the same framework and highlights the importance of hydrogen bonding and preorganization. The examples and analyses show that the reactions along the PCET continuum are more similar than they are different, and that attempts to divide these reactions into subcategories can obscure much of the essential chemistry. We hope that developing the many common features of these reactions will help experts and newcomers alike to explore exciting new territories in PCET reactivity.
质子偶联电子转移 (PCET) 涵盖了广泛的涉及电子和质子转移的反应。最著名的质子偶联电子转移反应,氢原子转移 (HAT),已经被研究了一个多世纪。HAT 通常被描述为氢原子 (H ≡ H + e) 从一个基团到另一个基团的协同转移,Y + H-X → Y-H + X,但 HAT 的严格定义一直难以确立。当“H”的转移涉及到空间上不同的位置或甚至完全分离的试剂(多位置协同质子-电子转移,MS-CPET)时,区分就更加具有挑战性。MS-CPET 反应性在生物和合成背景中越来越多地被提出,并且一些通常被描述为 HAT 的反应更类似于 MS-CPET。尽管 HAT 和 MS-CPET 反应“看起来不同”,但我们在这里认为这些反应位于一个反应性连续体上,并且它们受到许多相同的关键参数的控制。本专题介绍了一系列研究,展示了看似以不同方式移动质子和电子的反应之间的强烈相似性,引导读者穿越这个 PCET 反应性连续体。为了为我们的漫步做好准备,我们描述了 HAT 和 MS-CPET 的热化学和动力学框架。溶液 HAT 反应的驱动力最容易讨论为反应物和产物的键离解自由能 (BDFE) 的差异。BDFE 可以分析为电子和质子转移步骤的总和,因此可以从 p K 和 E° 值获得。尽管 MS-CPET 反应不像 HAT 那样以相同的方式形成和断裂 H-X 键,但可以使用有效 BDFE(BDFE)引入相同的热化学描述。还原剂/酸对的 BDFE 是形成 H 的该对的自由能,这可以以类似于标准 BDFE 的方式从 p K 和 E° 值获得。当 PCET 热化学已知时,可以使用线性自由能关系(布朗斯台德催化定律)和马库斯理论类型方法理解和经常预测 HAT 和 PCET 速率常数。有了这个背景知识,我们带领读者穿越 PCET 反应性的连续体。我们的旅程从烃底物到金属-氧络合物的金属介导 HAT 开始,然后到达涉及从羟胺 TEMPOH 到两个完全分离的分子转移 H 和 e 的 MS-CPET 反应性谱的末端。这些例子以及它们之间的例子都在相同的热力学和动力学框架内进行了分析。对第一个涉及 C-H 键的 MS-CPET 例子的描述使用了相同的框架,并强调了氢键和预组织的重要性。这些例子和分析表明,PCET 连续体上的反应比它们之间的差异更相似,试图将这些反应划分为亚类可能会掩盖许多基本化学。我们希望发展这些反应的许多共同特征将帮助专家和新手 alike 探索 PCET 反应性的令人兴奋的新领域。