Parihar Ashish, Emge Thomas J, Hasanayn Faraj, Goldman Alan S
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, United States.
Department of Chemistry, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.
J Am Chem Soc. 2025 Mar 26;147(12):10279-10297. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c16699. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
We report that the cationic iridium complex (PCP)IrH catalyzes the transfer-dehydrogenation of alkanes to give alkenes and hydrogen isotope exchange (HIE) of alkanes and arenes. Contrary to established selectivity trends found for C-H activation by transition metal complexes, strained cycloalkanes, including cyclopentane, cycloheptane, and cyclooctane, undergo C-H addition much more readily than -alkanes, which in turn are much more reactive than cyclohexane. Aromatic C-H bonds also undergo H/D exchange much less rapidly than those of the strained cycloalkanes, but much more favorably than cyclohexane. The order of reactivity toward dehydrogenation correlates qualitatively with the reaction thermodynamics, but the magnitude is much greater than can be explained by thermodynamics. Accordingly, the cycloalkenes corresponding to the strained cycloalkanes undergo hydrogenation much more readily than cyclohexene, despite the less favorable thermodynamics of such hydrogenations. Computational (DFT) studies allow rationalization of the origin of reactivity and the unusual selectivity. Specifically, the initial C-H addition is strongly assisted by β-agostic interactions, which are particularly favorable for the strained cycloalkanes. Subsequent to α-C-H addition, the H atom of the β-agostic C-H bond is transferred directly to the hydride ligand of (PCP)IrH to give a dihydrogen ligand. The overall processes, C-H addition and β-H-transfer to hydride, are calculated to generally have minima on the IRC surface although not necessarily on the enthalpy or free energy surfaces; these minima are extremely shallow such that the 1,2-dehydrogenations are effectively concerted although asynchronous.
我们报道,阳离子铱配合物(PCP)IrH催化烷烃的转移脱氢反应生成烯烃,以及烷烃与芳烃的氢同位素交换(HIE)。与过渡金属配合物进行C-H活化所确立的选择性趋势相反,包括环戊烷、环庚烷和环辛烷在内的张力环烷烃比直链烷烃更容易发生C-H加成反应,而直链烷烃又比环己烷更具反应活性。芳族C-H键的H/D交换速度也比张力环烷烃的C-H键慢得多,但比环己烷的C-H键更有利。脱氢反应的反应活性顺序与反应热力学在定性上相关,但反应活性的程度远大于热力学所能解释的范围。因此,与张力环烷烃相对应的环烯烃比环己烯更容易发生氢化反应,尽管这种氢化反应的热力学条件不太有利。计算(DFT)研究有助于合理解释反应活性的起源和异常的选择性。具体来说,最初的C-H加成受到β- agostic相互作用的强烈促进,这对张力环烷烃特别有利。在α-C-H加成之后,β- agostic C-H键的H原子直接转移到(PCP)IrH的氢化物配体上,生成一个二氢配体。计算得出,尽管不一定在焓或自由能表面上,但C-H加成和β-H转移到氢化物的整个过程在IRC表面上通常有极小值;这些极小值非常浅,因此1,2-脱氢反应虽然不同步,但实际上是协同进行的。