Suppr超能文献

急性精神科病房心理社会干预实施的障碍:一项人种志观察研究。

Barriers to the implementation of psychosocial interventions on acute mental health wards: an ethnographic observational study.

作者信息

Berry Katherine, Johnston Isobel, Wilson Paul, Haddock Gillian, Bucci Sandra, Lovell Karina, Price Owen, Beinaraviciute Adele, Gilworth Gill, Kaur Sonalia, Morley Helen, Penn Georgia, Raphael Jessica, Samji Mica, Drake Richard J, Edge Dawn

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Department of Research and Innovation, Greater Manchester Mental Health National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 27;16:1501945. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1501945. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is notoriously challenging to deliver psychosocial interventions on acute mental health wards. This paper presents an ethnographic observational study which captured how ward and staff processes impacted on the delivery of a psychosocial intervention called TULIPS (Talk, Understand and Listen for Inpatient Settings). Although the paper is focused on one specific intervention, the findings have implications for the delivery of other psychosocial interventions within acute mental health settings.

METHOD

We carried out participant observation across 6 case studies wards all participating in the intervention arm of a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the TULIPS intervention compared to treatment as usual. Trained researchers observed ward environments, activities and social interactions taking detailed field notes which were later subject to thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Four themes were generated from field notes relating to aspects of the ward culture and staff behaviours which were barriers or facilitators to the delivery of the TULIPS intervention. Theme one highlighted how the person-centred nature of the TULIPS model was at odds with the pre-existing culture of the wards which favoured blanket rules. Theme two highlighted how staff prioritised task-oriented quantifiable activities which clashed with the emphasis the TULIPS model placed on relationship building. The third theme highlighted the presence of conflict between different groups of staff working on the ward and theme four highlighted the stressful nature of the ward environment which drove staff to seek refuge from patient facing activities including TULIPS related activities.

CONCLUSIONS

In order to successfully engage with the delivery of psychosocial interventions on acute mental health wards, staff need access to supportive leadership which champions psychological interventions, as well as training, supervision and support systems which value the demanding nature of working on mental health inpatient wards.

摘要

背景

在急性精神科病房提供心理社会干预极具挑战性,这是出了名的。本文介绍了一项人种志观察研究,该研究记录了病房环境和工作人员流程如何影响一种名为TULIPS(住院环境中的交谈、理解和倾听)的心理社会干预措施的实施。尽管本文聚焦于一项特定干预措施,但研究结果对在急性精神科环境中实施其他心理社会干预措施具有启示意义。

方法

我们对6个案例研究病房进行了参与观察,所有这些病房都参与了一项整群随机对照试验的干预组,该试验将TULIPS干预措施与常规治疗进行比较。经过培训的研究人员观察病房环境、活动和社交互动,并详细记录现场笔记,随后对这些笔记进行主题分析。

结果

从现场笔记中产生了四个主题,涉及病房文化和工作人员行为的各个方面,这些方面是TULIPS干预措施实施的障碍或促进因素。主题一强调了TULIPS模式以人为本的性质与病房原有的倾向于统一规则的文化如何不一致。主题二强调了工作人员如何优先开展以任务为导向的可量化活动,这与TULIPS模式对建立关系的重视相冲突。第三个主题强调了病房不同工作人员群体之间冲突的存在,主题四强调了病房环境的压力性质,这使得工作人员逃避与患者面对面的活动,包括与TULIPS相关的活动。

结论

为了在急性精神科病房成功开展心理社会干预措施,工作人员需要获得支持性领导,这种领导倡导心理干预,还需要培训、监督和支持系统,这些系统重视在精神科住院病房工作的高要求性质。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Staff support for workplace trauma: a freedom of information act request survey for NHS trusts providing mental health care in England.
J Ment Health. 2024 Dec;33(6):701-705. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2023.2278094. Epub 2023 Nov 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验