Ofoegbu Okechukwu Uche, Irurhe Nicholas, Saalu Tersur Terry, Familusi Oluwaseun Emmanuel, Maduagu Charity Opeoluwapo, Tietie Lucky Enajite, Kusamotu Olaniyi Araotan, Babah Ochuwa Adiketu
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria.
Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria.
BMC Med Imaging. 2025 Mar 25;25(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01634-z.
Accurate prediction of foetal gestational age is of critical importance as it can positively affect the outcome of pregnancy. Routine sonographic estimation of gestational age using biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length is popular but has limitations especially when used as a singly or in late pregnancy. Often pregnant women in low-middle-income countries like Nigeria register for antenatal care late in pregnancy, necessitating the need for a single, cost-effective parameter that requires minimal skills to measure gestational age accurately in late pregnancies. This study examined the accuracy of ultrasonographic transcerebellar diameter compared to other foetal biometric parameters for dating in third trimester of pregnancy.
An analytic cross-sectional study conducted at Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Idi-Araba, Lagos, on 110 pregnant women in their third trimester. Data was collected using an interviewer administered questionnaire. Transabdominal ultrasound scan was done to determine the gestational age by measuring the biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, femur length and transcerebellar diameter. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlation between the biometric measurements; Accuracy was determine using gestational age from menstrual date as gold standard and comparisons made using Chi square test.
Mean age of participants was 31.5 ± 5.8 years; mean gestational age 236 ± 25 days. Compared to biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length, transcerebellar diameter correlates best with gestational age (r = 0.8837, p < 0.001). At an error margin of ± 2weeks, transcerebellar diameter had a high predictive accuracy of 84.6%, though significantly less than that for abdominal circumference alone, 86.4% (p = 0.003), and also less than that for all four well known foetal biometric parameters (biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length) combined, 85.5% (p < 0.001).
Transcerebellar diameter has a better correlation with gestational age than other routine foetal biometric parameters and has high predictive accuracy for dating in third trimester of pregnancy. It may thus play a relevant role in low resource settings where there is shortage of staff and limited skills in obstetric ultrasonography.
Not applicable for this study.
准确预测胎儿孕周至关重要,因为它可对妊娠结局产生积极影响。使用双顶径、头围、腹围和股骨长度进行孕周的常规超声估算是常用的,但存在局限性,尤其是单独使用或在妊娠晚期使用时。在尼日利亚等低收入和中等收入国家,孕妇往往在妊娠晚期才登记进行产前检查,因此需要一个单一的、具有成本效益且测量孕周所需技能最少的参数,以便在妊娠晚期准确测量孕周。本研究比较了超声小脑横径与其他胎儿生物测量参数在妊娠晚期确定孕周方面的准确性。
在拉各斯伊迪-阿拉巴的拉各斯大学教学医院对110名妊娠晚期孕妇进行了一项分析性横断面研究。使用访谈式问卷收集数据。通过经腹超声扫描测量双顶径、头围、腹围、股骨长度和小脑横径以确定孕周。采用Spearman相关系数确定生物测量值之间的相关性;以末次月经日期确定的孕周作为金标准来确定准确性,并使用卡方检验进行比较。
参与者的平均年龄为31.5±5.8岁;平均孕周为236±25天。与双顶径、头围、腹围和股骨长度相比,小脑横径与孕周的相关性最佳(r = 0.8837,p < 0.001)。在误差范围为±2周时,小脑横径的预测准确率较高,为84.6%,但显著低于单独腹围的预测准确率86.4%(p = 0.003),也低于所有四个著名胎儿生物测量参数(双顶径、头围、腹围和股骨长度)综合的预测准确率85.5%(p < 0.001)。
与其他常规胎儿生物测量参数相比,小脑横径与孕周的相关性更好,在妊娠晚期确定孕周方面具有较高的预测准确率。因此,在人员短缺且产科超声技能有限的资源匮乏环境中,它可能发挥重要作用。
本研究不适用。