Suppr超能文献

不同体重指数个体从坐立转换过程中的协调模式与能量流分析

Coordination Patterns and Energy Flow Analysis in Sit-to-Stand Transitions Among Individuals with Different Body Mass Indexes.

作者信息

Li Lei, Liu Xuan, Liu Ye

机构信息

School of Sport Science, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China.

Laboratory of Sports Stress and Adaptation of General Administration of Sport, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China.

出版信息

Life (Basel). 2025 Mar 14;15(3):464. doi: 10.3390/life15030464.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study investigates the differences in limb coordination patterns and energy transfer strategies during sit-to-stand (STS) transitions among young adults (18-30 years) with overweight (OW), normal weight (NW), and underweight (UW) conditions, providing a theoretical foundation for understanding the impact of BMI variations on movement control mechanisms and informing health intervention strategies.

METHODS

Forty participants were classified into OW, NW, and UW groups. Motion data were collected via an infrared motion capture system and force plate. Biomechanical indices were computed using Visual 3D and MATLAB2020a. Coordination patterns were assessed using vector coding, and the segmental net power was analyzed to evaluate energy flow during STS. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Compared to the NW and UW groups, the OW group exhibited significant differences in movement coordination patterns and energy flow. In terms of coordination patterns, the OW group adopted more hip-knee distal coordination patterns in the FMP phase and more knee-ankle proximal coordination patterns. In the MTP phase, the OW group exhibited a lower frequency of hip-ankle anti-phase coordination patterns compared to the UW group. In the EP phase, the OW group showed a lower frequency of trunk-pelvis proximal coordination patterns than the UW group ( < 0.05). Regarding energy flow, in the FMP phase, the OW group exhibited higher joint power (JP) and segment power (SP) in the trunk compared to the UW group. In the pelvic segment, both JP and SP were higher in the OW group than in the NW and UW groups. In the thigh segment, muscle power (MP) was higher in the OW group than in the NW and UW groups, and SP was higher than in the NW group ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Changes in BMI affect movement coordination and energy transfer strategies during STS. OW individuals compensate for insufficient hip drive by relying on trunk and pelvic power, which may increase the knee and trunk load over time. In contrast, UW individuals exhibit greater lower-limb flexibility and rely on trunk-pelvis coordination to compensate for stability deficits. Future research should develop targeted exercise interventions to optimize movement patterns and reduce injury risk across BMI groups.

摘要

背景

本研究调查了超重(OW)、正常体重(NW)和体重过轻(UW)的年轻成年人(18 - 30岁)在从坐姿到站立(STS)转换过程中肢体协调模式和能量转移策略的差异,为理解体重指数(BMI)变化对运动控制机制的影响以及为健康干预策略提供理论基础。

方法

40名参与者被分为OW、NW和UW组。通过红外运动捕捉系统和测力台收集运动数据。使用Visual 3D和MATLAB2020a计算生物力学指标。使用矢量编码评估协调模式,并分析节段净功率以评估STS期间的能量流动。使用单因素方差分析(α = 0.05)进行统计分析。

结果

与NW组和UW组相比,OW组在运动协调模式和能量流动方面存在显著差异。在协调模式方面,OW组在FMP阶段采用更多的髋 - 膝远端协调模式,以及更多的膝 - 踝近端协调模式。在MTP阶段,与UW组相比,OW组髋 - 踝反相协调模式的频率较低。在EP阶段,OW组躯干 - 骨盆近端协调模式的频率低于UW组(<0.05)。关于能量流动,在FMP阶段,与UW组相比,OW组在躯干中的关节功率(JP)和节段功率(SP)更高。在骨盆节段,OW组的JP和SP均高于NW组和UW组。在大腿节段,OW组的肌肉功率(MP)高于NW组和UW组,且SP高于NW组(<0.05)。

结论

BMI的变化会影响STS期间的运动协调和能量转移策略。超重个体通过依赖躯干和骨盆力量来弥补髋部驱动力不足,这可能会随着时间的推移增加膝盖和躯干的负荷。相比之下,体重过轻个体表现出更大的下肢灵活性,并依赖躯干 - 骨盆协调来弥补稳定性不足。未来的研究应制定有针对性的运动干预措施,以优化各BMI组的运动模式并降低受伤风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0810/11944210/eaf4d81becd0/life-15-00464-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验