Pacca Lucia, Gaye S Amina, Brenowitz Willa D, Fujishiro Kaori, Glymour M Maria, Harrati Amal, Vable Anusha M
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 2540 23rd St, San Francisco, CA, 94110, United States.
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, United States; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th St 2nd Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, United States.
Soc Sci Med. 2025 May;372:117976. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117976. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
Periods out of employment may influence dementia, but characterizing lifecourse employment is difficult and prior research is sparse. This study used sequence and cluster analysis to characterize type, timing, and duration of lifecourse work gaps and estimate associations with dementia risk. Life History Mail Survey supplement to the U.S. Health Retirement Study participants (N = 5,945, 13.6 % of the Health and Retirement Study sample) reported lifecourse employment (full time or part time) and reasons and age of work gaps (unemployment, schooling, caregiving, or disability). Our exposure was gender-stratified employment trajectories from age 18-65, characterized using sequence analysis and cluster analysis. Our outcomes were algorithmically defined dementia probability scores and memory scores. We estimated the association between employment trajectories and dementia risk using generalized estimating equations and memory decline using linear mixed effect models, adjusted for age, gender, birthplace, and childhood socioeconomic status. We identified 11 employment trajectories for women (including predominant work, disability, unemployment, caregiving, retirement) and 10 for men (similar, but no caregiving). Compared to "predominant work", "disability" and "unemployment" trajectories were associated with higher dementia risk for men and women (e.g., disability among women: OR = 3.62; 95 % CI = 2.25, 5.81). Among women who cared for family, those who did not re-enter the labor force full-time had higher dementia risk (e.g. "family gap, go back part time": OR = 1.79; 95 % CI = 1.15, 2.79) compared to the predominant work cluster. Women who cared for family and returned to full-time work had similar cognitive outcomes to those in the predominant work cluster. Men who had long spells of part-time work also had elevated dementia risk (e.g. part time earlier: OR = 1.64; 95 % CI = 1.16, 2.57). Finally, women and men with long periods of unreported employment status had higher dementia risk than those in the predominant work trajectory. Results suggest the type, timing and duration of work gaps are differentially associated with dementia risk. Work gaps due to disability, unemployment or unreported employment status predicted higher dementia risk. Permanently leaving full-time work for caregiving predicted worse cognitive outcomes but temporary caregiving-related work interruptions did not.
失业期可能会影响痴呆症,但描述生命历程中的就业情况很困难,而且先前的研究很少。本研究使用序列分析和聚类分析来描述生命历程中工作间隙的类型、时间和持续时间,并估计与痴呆症风险的关联。美国健康与退休研究的参与者(N = 5945,占健康与退休研究样本的13.6%)通过生命历史邮件调查补充内容报告了生命历程中的就业情况(全职或兼职)以及工作间隙的原因和年龄(失业、上学、照顾他人或残疾)。我们的暴露因素是18至65岁按性别分层的就业轨迹,使用序列分析和聚类分析进行描述。我们的结局指标是通过算法定义的痴呆症概率得分和记忆得分。我们使用广义估计方程估计就业轨迹与痴呆症风险之间的关联,使用线性混合效应模型估计就业轨迹与记忆衰退之间的关联,并对年龄、性别、出生地和童年社会经济地位进行了调整。我们确定了女性的11种就业轨迹(包括主要工作、残疾、失业、照顾他人、退休)和男性的10种就业轨迹(类似,但没有照顾他人的情况)。与“主要工作”相比,“残疾”和“失业”轨迹与男性和女性患痴呆症的风险较高有关(例如,女性中的残疾情况:OR = 3.62;95%CI = 2.25,5.81)。在照顾家人的女性中,那些没有重新全职进入劳动力市场的人患痴呆症的风险较高(例如,“家庭间隙,兼职回归”:OR = 1.79;95%CI = 1.15,2.79),与主要工作类别相比。照顾家人并回归全职工作的女性与主要工作类别中的女性具有相似的认知结果。长期从事兼职工作的男性患痴呆症的风险也较高(例如,早期兼职:OR = 1.64;95%CI = 1.16,2.57)。最后,长期就业状况未报告的女性和男性患痴呆症的风险高于主要工作轨迹中的人。结果表明,工作间隙的类型、时间和持续时间与痴呆症风险存在不同程度的关联。因残疾、失业或就业状况未报告导致的工作间隙预示着患痴呆症的风险较高。因照顾家人而永久离开全职工作预示着认知结果较差,但与照顾家人相关的临时工作中断则不然。