Magri Vittorio, Perletti Gianpaolo, Stamatiou Konstantinos
Urology Clinic, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco Hospitals, 20026 Milan, Italy.
Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, Section of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 18;15(6):762. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15060762.
Chronic prostatitis (CP) is characterized by a variety of symptoms, including pelvic pain, urinary disturbances, and sexual dysfunction, often without clear signs of infection, which complicates its diagnosis. For decades, the NIH consensus definitions and the Meares-Stamey 4-glass test have been the cornerstone of diagnosing and classifying CP. However, emerging research suggests that some cases with negative microbiological findings may still respond to antibacterial therapy, potentially due to undiagnosed infections. This study aimed to compare four lower genito-urinary tract diagnostic methods to identify which is most effective at detecting causative pathogens in CP patients. Two simplified tests, each involving only two specimens, were also simulated. This retrospective study examined a database of patients diagnosed with chronic prostatitis according to NIH criteria. Patients aged 18-59 underwent clinical and microbiological diagnostic assessments using four testing modalities: the Meares-Stamey 4-glass "gold standard" test, the two-glass pre-post-massage test, and two tests incorporating post-massage semen samples, namely the five-glass test and the VB2-semen test. The diagnostic outcomes and pathogen detection rates for each test were compared using the ANOVA and the Pearson's chi-squared tests. Compared to the four-glass and two-glass tests, the five-glass and VB2-semen tests detected similar proportions of and other Gram-negative traditional prostatic pathogens. However, they were more effective in detecting significantly higher percentages of Enterococci. Moreover, the five-glass and VB2-semen tests, which included semen samples, identified a broader spectrum of pathogens and significantly higher proportions of sexually transmitted pathogens. Tests that included semen samples were more effective at detecting Gram-positive pathogens such as Enterococci and sexually transmitted pathogens. We advocate for incorporating semen samples into the standard four-glass test to enhance diagnostic accuracy and improve the targeted antibacterial treatment of chronic prostatitis.
慢性前列腺炎(CP)的特征是出现多种症状,包括盆腔疼痛、排尿障碍和性功能障碍,通常没有明显的感染迹象,这使其诊断变得复杂。几十年来,美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的共识定义和米尔斯-斯塔米四杯试验一直是CP诊断和分类的基石。然而,新出现的研究表明,一些微生物学检查结果为阴性的病例可能仍对抗菌治疗有反应,这可能是由于存在未被诊断出的感染。本研究旨在比较四种下泌尿生殖道诊断方法,以确定哪种方法在检测CP患者的致病病原体方面最有效。还模拟了两种简化试验,每种试验仅涉及两份标本。这项回顾性研究检查了一个根据NIH标准诊断为慢性前列腺炎的患者数据库。年龄在18至59岁之间的患者接受了四种检测方式的临床和微生物学诊断评估:米尔斯-斯塔米四杯“金标准”试验、两杯按摩前后试验,以及两种包含按摩后精液样本的试验,即五杯试验和VB2-精液试验。使用方差分析和皮尔逊卡方检验比较了每种试验的诊断结果和病原体检测率。与四杯试验和两杯试验相比,五杯试验和VB2-精液试验检测到的大肠埃希菌和其他革兰氏阴性传统前列腺病原体比例相似。然而,它们在检测肠球菌方面更有效,检测到的肠球菌百分比显著更高。此外,包含精液样本的五杯试验和VB2-精液试验识别出的病原体谱更广,性传播病原体的比例显著更高。包含精液样本的试验在检测革兰氏阳性病原体(如肠球菌)和性传播病原体方面更有效。我们主张将精液样本纳入标准的四杯试验中,以提高诊断准确性,并改善慢性前列腺炎的针对性抗菌治疗。