Chen Xin, Wang Jianqin, Lu Ji
Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Center for Cognitive Science of Language, Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing 100083, China.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 4;15(3):304. doi: 10.3390/bs15030304.
This study used an electrophysiological technique to investigate the perception mechanism of Mandarin native speakers and learners from non-tonal language backgrounds when processing the third tone (T3) and its variants in Mandarin. The experiments used a 2 × 2 two-factor mixed design to examine the perception of T3 and its variants and the processing mechanisms of learners and native speakers under different levels of attention. Differences in attention and language backgrounds in the perception of Mandarin tones were further investigated. These results provide evidence that there are no significant differences in the perception of the two T3 variants by native Mandarin speakers under different attentional conditions. In contrast, learners from non-tonal language backgrounds were more likely to perceive a low flat tone as T3 than a low concave tone in the attentive condition. This means that learners are more likely to rely on low-pitch cues rather than the concave contour of the tone when perceiving T3.
本研究采用电生理技术,调查以普通话为母语者以及来自非声调语言背景的学习者在处理普通话第三声(T3)及其变体时的感知机制。实验采用2×2双因素混合设计,以检验对T3及其变体的感知以及不同注意力水平下学习者和母语者的处理机制。进一步研究了注意力和语言背景在普通话声调感知方面的差异。这些结果表明,在不同注意力条件下,以普通话为母语者对两种T3变体的感知没有显著差异。相比之下,在注意力集中的条件下,来自非声调语言背景的学习者将低调平调感知为T3的可能性比低调凹调更高。这意味着学习者在感知T3时更倾向于依赖低音调线索而非声调的凹形轮廓。