Brain and Cognitive Sciences Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 27;108(39):16428-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1112937108. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
Neuroscientists have debated for centuries whether some regions of the human brain are selectively engaged in specific high-level mental functions or whether, instead, cognition is implemented in multifunctional brain regions. For the critical case of language, conflicting answers arise from the neuropsychological literature, which features striking dissociations between deficits in linguistic and nonlinguistic abilities, vs. the neuroimaging literature, which has argued for overlap between activations for linguistic and nonlinguistic processes, including arithmetic, domain general abilities like cognitive control, and music. Here, we use functional MRI to define classic language regions functionally in each subject individually and then examine the response of these regions to the nonlinguistic functions most commonly argued to engage these regions: arithmetic, working memory, cognitive control, and music. We find little or no response in language regions to these nonlinguistic functions. These data support a clear distinction between language and other cognitive processes, resolving the prior conflict between the neuropsychological and neuroimaging literatures.
神经科学家们几个世纪以来一直在争论,人类大脑的某些区域是否专门用于特定的高级心理功能,还是认知功能是在多功能的大脑区域中实现的。对于语言这一关键情况,神经心理学文献中的相互矛盾的答案来自神经心理学文献,该文献特征在于语言和非语言能力之间的缺陷之间存在明显的分离,而神经影像学文献则认为语言和非语言过程(包括算术、认知控制等领域的一般能力和音乐)之间存在重叠。在这里,我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)在每个个体中单独定义经典语言区域的功能,然后检查这些区域对最常被认为涉及这些区域的非语言功能(如算术、工作记忆、认知控制和音乐)的反应。我们发现语言区域对这些非语言功能的反应很小或没有。这些数据支持语言和其他认知过程之间的明显区别,解决了神经心理学和神经影像学文献之间的先前冲突。