Bode Leah M, Kumar Komal A, McQuillan Josie C, Scott Nicole P, Bernard Caitlin
Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
AJOG Glob Rep. 2025 Feb 22;5(2):100469. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100469. eCollection 2025 May.
The decision has undoubtably affected the practice of abortion providers nationally. We hypothesized that has also impacted the ways in which providers experience meaning and purpose through their work, which are elements of spirituality.
We sought to describe the spectrum of spirituality of abortion providers and understand whether and how the decision caused spiritual distress.
For this qualitative study, we conducted video interviews with 26 abortion providers from 17 states between November 2022 and February 2023. States were classified according to the Guttmacher Institute classifications from most restrictive to very protective as of December 2022. Interviews included questions such as, and Dobbs
Participants' states of practice were well-distributed across the abortion restrictive-protective spectrum. The majority of participants were spiritual, while less than half identified as part of an organized religion. Many participants felt a spiritual or to provide abortion care and 46% described abortion as a for provider and/or patient. Most participants experienced spiritual distress (74%), including those practicing in states across the restrictive-protective spectrum. Of note, 92% of participants described their spirituality as helpful in coping with the effects of the fall of . Sources of strength included advocacy, agency, legislative work, and community; over half specifically cited the abortion provider community.
The decision-and subsequent state-level abortion restrictions-impacts abortion providers by causing spiritual distress. While many abortion-restrictive laws are influenced by religious or spiritual beliefs, it is important to recognize that abortion providers are also spiritual individuals.
这一决定无疑影响了全国堕胎服务提供者的执业情况。我们推测,这一决定也影响了提供者通过工作体验意义和目的的方式,而意义和目的是灵性的要素。
我们试图描述堕胎服务提供者的灵性范围,并了解这一决定是否以及如何导致了灵性困扰。
对于这项定性研究,我们在2022年11月至2023年2月期间对来自17个州的26名堕胎服务提供者进行了视频访谈。根据古特马赫研究所截至2022年12月的分类,将各州从限制最严格到保护最充分进行分类。访谈问题包括诸如“多布斯案”等问题。
参与者的执业州在堕胎限制-保护范围内分布良好。大多数参与者有灵性,而不到一半的人将自己认定为有组织宗教的一部分。许多参与者感到有一种灵性的“召唤”或“使命”去提供堕胎护理,46%的人将堕胎描述为对提供者和/或患者的“疗愈”。大多数参与者经历了灵性困扰(74%),包括在限制-保护范围内各州执业的人。值得注意的是,92%的参与者表示他们的灵性有助于应对多布斯案判决结果带来的影响。力量来源包括倡导、机构、立法工作和社区;超过一半的人特别提到了堕胎服务提供者社区。
多布斯案的判决以及随后各州层面的堕胎限制通过造成灵性困扰影响了堕胎服务提供者。虽然许多堕胎限制法律受到宗教或灵性信仰的影响,但重要的是要认识到堕胎服务提供者也是有灵性的个体。