• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
"I'm supposed to be a helper": Spiritual distress of abortion providers after the decision.“我本应是个帮助者”:堕胎决定后堕胎提供者的精神困扰
AJOG Glob Rep. 2025 Feb 22;5(2):100469. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100469. eCollection 2025 May.
2
State Abortion Policy and Moral Distress Among Clinicians Providing Abortion After the Dobbs Decision.多布斯案裁决后,各州堕胎政策与提供堕胎服务的临床医生的道德困扰
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2426248. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26248.
3
"I am putting my fear on them subconsciously": a qualitative study of contraceptive care in the context of abortion bans in the U.S.“我在潜意识里将恐惧投射到她们身上”:在美国堕胎禁令背景下的避孕护理定性研究
Reprod Health. 2024 Nov 24;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01908-9.
4
Changes in Reproductive Health Information-Seeking Behaviors After the Dobbs Decision: Systematic Search of the Wikimedia Database.多布斯案裁决后生殖健康信息寻求行为的变化:维基媒体数据库的系统检索
JMIR Infodemiology. 2024 Dec 16;4:e64577. doi: 10.2196/64577.
5
Online Medication Abortion Direct-to-Patient Fulfillment Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Decision.多布斯诉杰克逊案前后的在线药物流产直接向患者提供服务。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2434675. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.34675.
6
Student and Physician Views of How the Dobbs Decision Affects Training and Practice Location Preferences: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.学生和医生对多布斯裁决如何影响培训和执业地点偏好的看法:横断面问卷调查研究
Interact J Med Res. 2025 Jan 7;14:e55035. doi: 10.2196/55035.
7
People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the decision.决定前后人们对堕胎法的了解和态度。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2233794. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2233794.
8
Use of Oral and Emergency Contraceptives After the US Supreme Court's Dobbs Decision.美国最高法院“多布斯案”判决后口服避孕药和紧急避孕药的使用情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2418620. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18620.
9
Impact of State Abortion Policies on Family Medicine Practice and Training After .州堕胎政策对. 后的家庭医学实践和培训的影响
Ann Fam Med. 2024 Nov-Dec;22(6):492-501. doi: 10.1370/afm.3183.
10
Effects of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision on Obstetrics and Gynecology Graduating Residents' Practice Plans.多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案的裁决对妇产科住院医师毕业生执业计划的影响。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Nov 1;142(5):1105-1111. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005383. Epub 2023 Sep 28.

本文引用的文献

1
State Abortion Policy and Moral Distress Among Clinicians Providing Abortion After the Dobbs Decision.多布斯案裁决后,各州堕胎政策与提供堕胎服务的临床医生的道德困扰
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2426248. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26248.
2
US Obstetrician-Gynecologists' Perceived Impacts of Post-Dobbs v Jackson State Abortion Bans.美国妇产科医生对“多布斯诉杰克逊州立大学堕胎禁令”案后影响的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2352109. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.52109.
3
Addressing Moral Distress After Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization : A Professional Virtues-Based Approach.解决多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案后的道德困境:一种基于专业美德的方法。
Acad Med. 2024 Jan 1;99(1):12-15. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005476. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
4
Policy Changes as a Context for Moral Injury Development in the Wake of Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization.在多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案之后,政策变化成为道德伤害形成的背景。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jan 1;141(1):15-21. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005009. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
5
Implications of the Dobbs Decision for Medical Education: Inadequate Training and Moral Distress.多布斯裁决对医学教育的影响:培训不足与道德困境。
JAMA. 2022 Nov 1;328(17):1697-1698. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.19544.
6
Conscience reconsidered: The moral work of navigating participation in abortion care on labor and delivery.重新思考良心问题:在分娩时参与堕胎护理所进行的道德工作。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jul;232:181-189. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.03.034. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
7
Improving the spiritual dimension of whole person care: reaching national and international consensus.提升全人关怀的精神层面:达成国内外共识。
J Palliat Med. 2014 Jun;17(6):642-56. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.9427. Epub 2014 May 19.
8
Conscientious objection to provision of legal abortion care.对提供合法堕胎护理的谨慎反对。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Dec;123 Suppl 3:S60-2. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(13)60004-1.
9
Recognizing conscience in abortion provision.在堕胎服务中认识到良知问题。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):981-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1206253.
10
Obstetrician-gynecologists, religious institutions, and conflicts regarding patient-care policies.妇产科医生、宗教机构与患者医疗政策相关的冲突。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;207(1):73.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.023. Epub 2012 Apr 28.

“我本应是个帮助者”:堕胎决定后堕胎提供者的精神困扰

"I'm supposed to be a helper": Spiritual distress of abortion providers after the decision.

作者信息

Bode Leah M, Kumar Komal A, McQuillan Josie C, Scott Nicole P, Bernard Caitlin

机构信息

Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.

出版信息

AJOG Glob Rep. 2025 Feb 22;5(2):100469. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100469. eCollection 2025 May.

DOI:10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100469
PMID:40162006
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11952793/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The decision has undoubtably affected the practice of abortion providers nationally. We hypothesized that has also impacted the ways in which providers experience meaning and purpose through their work, which are elements of spirituality.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to describe the spectrum of spirituality of abortion providers and understand whether and how the decision caused spiritual distress.

STUDY DESIGN

For this qualitative study, we conducted video interviews with 26 abortion providers from 17 states between November 2022 and February 2023. States were classified according to the Guttmacher Institute classifications from most restrictive to very protective as of December 2022. Interviews included questions such as, and Dobbs

RESULTS

Participants' states of practice were well-distributed across the abortion restrictive-protective spectrum. The majority of participants were spiritual, while less than half identified as part of an organized religion. Many participants felt a spiritual or to provide abortion care and 46% described abortion as a for provider and/or patient. Most participants experienced spiritual distress (74%), including those practicing in states across the restrictive-protective spectrum. Of note, 92% of participants described their spirituality as helpful in coping with the effects of the fall of . Sources of strength included advocacy, agency, legislative work, and community; over half specifically cited the abortion provider community.

CONCLUSIONS

The decision-and subsequent state-level abortion restrictions-impacts abortion providers by causing spiritual distress. While many abortion-restrictive laws are influenced by religious or spiritual beliefs, it is important to recognize that abortion providers are also spiritual individuals.

摘要

背景

这一决定无疑影响了全国堕胎服务提供者的执业情况。我们推测,这一决定也影响了提供者通过工作体验意义和目的的方式,而意义和目的是灵性的要素。

目的

我们试图描述堕胎服务提供者的灵性范围,并了解这一决定是否以及如何导致了灵性困扰。

研究设计

对于这项定性研究,我们在2022年11月至2023年2月期间对来自17个州的26名堕胎服务提供者进行了视频访谈。根据古特马赫研究所截至2022年12月的分类,将各州从限制最严格到保护最充分进行分类。访谈问题包括诸如“多布斯案”等问题。

结果

参与者的执业州在堕胎限制-保护范围内分布良好。大多数参与者有灵性,而不到一半的人将自己认定为有组织宗教的一部分。许多参与者感到有一种灵性的“召唤”或“使命”去提供堕胎护理,46%的人将堕胎描述为对提供者和/或患者的“疗愈”。大多数参与者经历了灵性困扰(74%),包括在限制-保护范围内各州执业的人。值得注意的是,92%的参与者表示他们的灵性有助于应对多布斯案判决结果带来的影响。力量来源包括倡导、机构、立法工作和社区;超过一半的人特别提到了堕胎服务提供者社区。

结论

多布斯案的判决以及随后各州层面的堕胎限制通过造成灵性困扰影响了堕胎服务提供者。虽然许多堕胎限制法律受到宗教或灵性信仰的影响,但重要的是要认识到堕胎服务提供者也是有灵性的个体。