Kozhevnikova Maria V, Belenkov Yuri N, Shestakova Ksenia M, Ageev Anton A, Markin Pavel A, Kakotkina Anastasiia V, Korobkova Ekaterina O, Moskaleva Natalia E, Kuznetsov Ivan V, Khabarova Natalia V, Kukharenko Alexey V, Appolonova Svetlana A
Hospital Therapy No. 1 Department, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, 119435, Russia.
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 2-4 Bolshaya Pirogovskaya St., 119991, Moscow, Russia.
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 7;15(1):11849. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95553-2.
Classifying heart failure (HF) by stages and ejection fraction (EF) remains a debated topic in cardiology. Metabolomic profiling (MP) offers a means to identify unique pathophysiological changes across different phenotypes, presenting a promising approach for the diagnosis and prognosis of HF, as well as for the development of targeted therapies. In our study, MP was performed on 408 HF patients (54.9% male). The mean ages of patients were 62 [53;68], 67 [65;74], 68 [61;72], and 69 [65;73] years for stages A, B, C, and D, respectively. This study demonstrates high accuracy in HF stage classification, distinguishing Stage A from Stage B with an AUC ROC of 0.91 and Stage B from Stage C with an AUC ROC of 0.97, by integrating chromatography-mass spectrometry data through multiparametric machine learning models. The observed metabolic similarities between HF with mildly reduced EF and HF with reduced EF phenotypes (AUC ROC 0.96) once again highlight the fundamental differences at the cellular and molecular levels between HF with preserved EF and HF with EF < 50%. Hierarchical clustering based on MP identified four distinct HF phenotypes and 26 key metabolites, including metabolites of tryptophan catabolism, glutamine, riboflavin, norepinephrine, serine, and long- and medium-chain acylcarnitines. The average follow-up period was 542.37 [16;1271] days. A downward change in the trajectory of EF [HR 3,008, 95% CI 1,035 to 8,743, p = 0,043] and metabolomic cluster 3 [HR 2,880; 95% CI 1,062 to 7,810, p = 0,0376] were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality. MP can refine HF phenotyping and deepen the understanding of its underlying mechanisms. Metabolomic analysis illuminates the biochemical landscape of HF, aiding in its classification and suggesting new therapeutic pathways.
根据阶段和射血分数(EF)对心力衰竭(HF)进行分类在心脏病学中仍是一个有争议的话题。代谢组学分析(MP)提供了一种识别不同表型中独特病理生理变化的方法,为HF的诊断和预后以及靶向治疗的开发提供了一种有前景的方法。在我们的研究中,对408例HF患者(54.9%为男性)进行了MP。A、B、C和D期患者的平均年龄分别为62[53;68]、67[65;74]、68[61;72]和69[65;73]岁。本研究通过多参数机器学习模型整合色谱-质谱数据,在HF阶段分类中显示出高精度,区分A期和B期的AUC ROC为0.91,区分B期和C期的AUC ROC为0.97。射血分数轻度降低的HF和射血分数降低的HF表型之间观察到的代谢相似性(AUC ROC 0.96)再次突出了射血分数保留的HF和射血分数<50%的HF在细胞和分子水平上的根本差异。基于MP的层次聚类确定了四种不同的HF表型和26种关键代谢物,包括色氨酸分解代谢物、谷氨酰胺、核黄素、去甲肾上腺素、丝氨酸以及长链和中链酰基肉碱。平均随访期为542.37[16;1271]天。EF轨迹下降[HR 3.008,95%CI 1.035至8.743,p=0.043]和代谢组学聚类3[HR 2.880;95%CI 1.062至7.810,p=0.0376]与全因死亡风险增加相关。MP可以优化HF表型分析并加深对其潜在机制的理解。代谢组学分析阐明了HF的生化格局,有助于其分类并提示新的治疗途径。