• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Paradox of Choice in Palliative Care Decision-Making in Managed Long-Term Care: A Qualitative Study.长期管理式照护中姑息治疗决策的选择悖论:一项定性研究
Home Health Care Manag Pract. 2025 Feb;37(1):45-53. doi: 10.1177/10848223241247197. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
2
Determinants and Experiences of Care-Seeking for Childhood Pneumonia in a Rural Indian Setting: A Mixed-Methods Study.印度农村地区儿童肺炎就医的决定因素与经历:一项混合方法研究
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70263. doi: 10.1111/hex.70263.
3
Qualitative Interviews Exploring Palliative Care Perspectives of Latinos on Dialysis.探索拉丁裔透析患者姑息治疗观点的定性访谈
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 May 8;12(5):788-798. doi: 10.2215/CJN.10260916. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
4
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
5
Using Palliative Care Needs Rounds in the UK for care home staff and residents: an implementation science study.在英国,使用姑息治疗需求评估小组为养老院工作人员和居民提供服务:一项实施科学研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(19):1-134. doi: 10.3310/KRWQ5829.
6
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
7
Initiating decision-making conversations in palliative care: an ethnographic discourse analysis.在姑息治疗中开展决策对话:一项人种志话语分析
BMC Palliat Care. 2014 Dec 23;13:63. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-13-63. eCollection 2014.
8
Improving Sexual and Gender Minority Cancer Care: Patient and Caregiver Perspectives From a Multi-Methods Pilot Study.改善性少数群体和性别少数群体的癌症护理:一项多方法试点研究中患者和护理人员的观点
Front Oncol. 2022 May 6;12:833195. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.833195. eCollection 2022.
9
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of hospital-based specialist palliative care for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers.针对患有晚期疾病的成年人及其护理人员的医院专科姑息治疗的有效性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 30;9(9):CD012780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012780.pub2.
10
Feasibility of a rural palliative supportive service.农村姑息支持服务的可行性
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Apr-Jun;15(2):3116. Epub 2015 May 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Palliative care use and utilization determinants among patients treated for advanced stage lung cancer care in the community and academic medical setting.在社区和学术医疗机构接受晚期肺癌治疗的患者中,姑息治疗的使用和利用决定因素。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Feb 27;31(3):190. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07649-y.
2
Decision-making in palliative care: patient and family caregiver concordance and discordance-systematic review and narrative synthesis.姑息治疗中的决策制定:患者和家庭照护者的一致性和不一致性——系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 Dec;13(4):374-385. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2022-003525. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
3
A Cross-Cultural Study of Filial Piety and Palliative Care Knowledge: Moderating Effect of Culture and Universality of Filial Piety.孝道与姑息治疗知识的跨文化研究:文化的调节作用与孝道的普遍性
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 3;12:787724. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.787724. eCollection 2021.
4
What's Wrong With Advance Care Planning?预先护理规划存在什么问题?
JAMA. 2021 Oct 26;326(16):1575-1576. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.16430.
5
Reluctance to Accept Palliative Care and Recommendations for Improvement: Findings From Semi-Structured Interviews With Patients and Caregivers.不愿接受姑息治疗及改进建议:对患者和护理人员进行半结构化访谈的结果。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Feb;39(2):189-195. doi: 10.1177/10499091211012605. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
6
Mutual support between patients and family caregivers in palliative care: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.姑息治疗中患者与家庭照顾者之间的相互支持:一项系统评价与叙述性综合分析
Palliat Med. 2021 May;35(5):875-885. doi: 10.1177/0269216321999962. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
7
Empowerment-oriented strategies to identify behavior change in patients with chronic diseases: An integrative review of the literature.以赋权为导向的策略识别慢性病患者的行为变化:文献的综合回顾。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Apr;104(4):689-702. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.011. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
8
Exploring patient-reported barriers to advance care planning in family practice.探索家庭医疗中患者对预先医疗指示计划的阻碍因素。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 May 25;21(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01167-0.
9
Building trust and facilitating goals of care conversations: A qualitative study in people with heart failure receiving home hospice care.建立信任和促进关怀目标的对话:在接受家庭临终关怀的心力衰竭患者中的定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2020 Jul;34(7):925-933. doi: 10.1177/0269216320917873. Epub 2020 May 6.
10
Hospice and Palliative Care: An Overview.临终关怀和姑息治疗概述。
Med Clin North Am. 2020 May;104(3):359-373. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2020.01.001.

长期管理式照护中姑息治疗决策的选择悖论:一项定性研究

The Paradox of Choice in Palliative Care Decision-Making in Managed Long-Term Care: A Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Song Jiyoun, Ramlogan Lynette, Vergez Sasha, Davoudi Anahita, Sridharan Sridevi, Cho Hannah, Stanley June, McDonald Margaret V, Bowles Kathryn H, Shang Jingjing, Stone Patricia W, Topaz Maxim

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

VNS Health, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Home Health Care Manag Pract. 2025 Feb;37(1):45-53. doi: 10.1177/10848223241247197. Epub 2024 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1177/10848223241247197
PMID:40200976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11978416/
Abstract

Palliative care offers undeniable advantages to elderly patients with multiple chronic illnesses in managed long-term care. However, only approximately 14% of those who require palliative care actually receive it. To investigate factors influencing decision-making regarding palliative care acceptance, and healthcare providers' communication strategies, which patients or family caregivers perceive during managed long-term care. Qualitative thematic content analysis study. Two data sources from home and community-based health care organization in a metropolitical city in the Northeastern United States were used: (a) retrospectively collected 79 phone call audio recordings between patients and/or family caregivers with healthcare providers when initiate palliative care option, and (b) prospectively collected 10 exploratory qualitative interviews with patients and/or family caregivers for this study purpose. From a total of 89 conversations, 7 themes emerged during palliative care decision-making: (a) capability for self-management; (b) symptom severity; (c) perceptions of chronic disease; (d) satisfaction with current health services; (e) code status; (f) caregiver burden and (g) other reasons, including financial considerations and service affiliations. In addition, from 10 qualitative interviews, 4 key themes in healthcare providers' communication that optimize palliative care conversations were indicated: (i) trust and relationship dynamics; (ii) positive reinforcement and personal connection; (iii) conversation setting and initiator; and (iv) collaborative approach to care coordination. Enhancing decision-making around palliative care and improving acceptance of palliative care services may be improved through the integration of personalized care plans, empathetic communication, use of symptom-inclusive assessments for timely care, and proactively addressing caregiver burden.

摘要

姑息治疗为长期管理式照护中的患有多种慢性病的老年患者带来了不可否认的益处。然而,真正接受姑息治疗的患者仅占需要姑息治疗患者的约14%。本研究旨在调查影响姑息治疗接受决策的因素,以及在长期管理式照护中患者或家庭照护者所感知到的医疗服务提供者的沟通策略。采用定性主题内容分析法进行研究。使用了美国东北部一个大城市的家庭和社区医疗保健组织的两个数据源:(a)回顾性收集的79段患者和/或家庭照护者与医疗服务提供者在启动姑息治疗选项时的电话录音,以及(b)前瞻性收集的10段针对本研究目的对患者和/或家庭照护者进行的探索性定性访谈。在总共89次对话中,出现了姑息治疗决策过程中的7个主题:(a)自我管理能力;(b)症状严重程度;(c)对慢性病的认知;(d)对当前医疗服务的满意度;(e)医疗急救状态;(f)照护者负担;以及(g)其他原因,包括经济考虑和服务归属。此外,从10次定性访谈中,还指出了医疗服务提供者沟通中优化姑息治疗对话的4个关键主题:(i)信任和关系动态;(ii)积极强化和个人联系;(iii)对话环境和发起者;以及(iv)协作式护理协调方法。通过整合个性化护理计划、共情沟通、使用包含症状的评估以实现及时护理,以及积极解决照护者负担,可能会改善围绕姑息治疗的决策制定并提高姑息治疗服务的接受度。