Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington (Dr Thompson, Ms Carosso, Dr Hohl); and Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (Dr Griffith, Ms Workman, Dr Faustman).
J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Oct;59(10):982-987. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001107.
The aim of this study was to examine the impact of a dissemination process to provide individual pesticide results to study participants.
After working with community members to disseminate data, 37 participants were recontacted via an interview survey to assess the effectiveness of the dissemination process.
Almost all participants (97.3%) recalled a home visit from a health promoter; 29 (78.4%) correctly recalled that the health promoter used a thermometer or graphic to explain the results; 26 (70.3%) correctly interpreted graphics showing high and low exposure levels in adults and 75.7% correctly interpreted results for children.
The study results support the use of a community-based participatory research approach to decide how to best depict and disseminate study results, especially among participants who are often left out of the dissemination process.
本研究旨在探讨提供个人农药暴露结果的传播过程对研究参与者的影响。
在与社区成员合作传播数据后，通过访谈调查重新联系了 37 名参与者，以评估传播过程的效果。
几乎所有参与者（97.3%）都记得有一名健康促进员上门拜访；29 名参与者（78.4%）正确回忆起健康促进员使用温度计或图表来解释结果；26 名参与者（70.3%）正确解读了显示成人高暴露和低暴露水平的图表，75.7%的参与者正确解读了儿童的结果。
研究结果支持采用社区参与式研究方法来决定如何最好地描述和传播研究结果，尤其是对于那些经常被排除在传播过程之外的参与者。
