Machida Yuichi, Iwai Tomoaki, Kabei Kazuya, Uchida Junji
Department of Urology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3, Asahi-Machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 29;14(7):2368. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072368.
Ischemic time plays a crucial role in graft function and survival during kidney transplantation. Cooling methods, including cold perfusion and ice slush, are predominantly applied to preserve the kidney, but they may cause uneven cooling and complications. The Organ Pocket, an insulated gel bag, has been introduced as an alternative cooling method. However, no studies have compared renal temperature changes between the Organ Pocket and conventional cooling methods. We retrospectively analyzed 49 cases of living-donor kidney transplantation. Among these, 33 received kidney grafts preserved with the Organ Pocket (OP group), and 16 underwent conventional cooling (control group). Renal surface temperatures were recorded at 5 min intervals during vascular anastomosis using thermography. Postoperative renal function was assessed with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum creatinine (sCr), and liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) levels. The OP group demonstrated significantly higher renal surface temperatures than the control group during vascular anastomosis ( < 0.05). Renal surface temperature before reperfusion was 20.4 °C ± 2.5 °C and 17.2 °C ± 2.5 °C in the OP and control groups, respectively. No significant differences in postoperative eGFR, sCr, and L-FABP levels; delayed graft function (DGF); or acute rejection rates were observed between the groups. The Organ Pocket effectively stabilized renal temperatures during vascular anastomosis without direct cooling, thereby reducing continuous manual cooling requirements. Short-term renal function outcomes were comparable between groups; however, the Organ Pocket may improve surgical efficiency and be particularly beneficial in robot-assisted kidney transplantation. Further studies are warranted to investigate its long-term benefits.
缺血时间在肾移植过程中对移植物功能和存活起着关键作用。包括冷灌注和冰泥在内的冷却方法主要用于保存肾脏,但它们可能会导致冷却不均匀和并发症。器官袋,一种隔热凝胶袋,已被引入作为一种替代冷却方法。然而,尚无研究比较器官袋与传统冷却方法之间的肾脏温度变化。我们回顾性分析了49例活体供肾移植病例。其中,33例接受了用器官袋保存的肾移植(器官袋组),16例采用传统冷却方法(对照组)。在血管吻合期间,使用热成像每隔5分钟记录一次肾脏表面温度。术后肾功能通过估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、血清肌酐(sCr)和肝型脂肪酸结合蛋白(L-FABP)水平进行评估。器官袋组在血管吻合期间的肾脏表面温度显著高于对照组(<0.05)。器官袋组和对照组再灌注前的肾脏表面温度分别为20.4℃±2.5℃和17.2℃±2.5℃。两组之间在术后eGFR、sCr和L-FABP水平、移植肾功能延迟(DGF)或急性排斥反应发生率方面均未观察到显著差异。器官袋在不直接冷却的情况下有效地稳定了血管吻合期间的肾脏温度,从而减少了持续手动冷却的需求。两组之间的短期肾功能结果相当;然而,器官袋可能会提高手术效率,并且在机器人辅助肾移植中可能特别有益。有必要进行进一步研究以探讨其长期益处。