Suppr超能文献

通过针对精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的数字团体干预促进认知健康的iCogCA:一项非随机同期对照试验方案

iCogCA to Promote Cognitive Health Through Digital Group Interventions for Individuals Living With a Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder: Protocol for a Nonrandomized Concurrent Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Au-Yeung Christy, Thai Helen, Best Michael, Bowie Christopher R, Guimond Synthia, Lavigne Katie M, Menon Mahesh, Moritz Steffen, Piat Myra, Sauvé Geneviève, Sousa Ana Elisa, Thibaudeau Elisabeth, Woodward Todd S, Lepage Martin, Raucher-Chéné Delphine

机构信息

Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Apr 15;14:e63269. doi: 10.2196/63269.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairments are a key aspect of schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs), significantly affecting clinical and functional outcomes. The COVID-19 pandemic has heightened concerns about mental health services and cognitive stimulation opportunities. Despite evidence-based interventions like action-based cognitive remediation (ABCR) and metacognitive training (MCT), a research-to-practice gap exists in their application across mental health settings.

OBJECTIVE

The iCogCA study aims to address this gap by implementing digital ABCR and MCT through a national Canadian collaborative effort using digital psychological interventions to enhance cognitive health in SSDs.

METHODS

The study involves 5 Canadian sites, with mental health care practitioners trained digitally through the E-Cog platform, which was developed by our research group. Over 2.5 years, participants with SSDs will undergo pre- and postintervention assessments for clinical symptoms, cognition, and functioning. Each site will run groups annually for both ABCR and MCT, totaling ~390 participants. A nonrandomized concurrent controlled design will assess effectiveness design, in which one intervention (eg, ABCR) acts as the active control for the other (eg, MCT) and vice versa, comparing cognitive and clinical outcomes between the interventions using generalized linear mixed effect modeling. Implementation strategy evaluation will consider the digital platform's efficacy for mental health care practitioners' training, contextual factors influencing implementation, and sustainability, using descriptive statistics for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative data.

RESULTS

A pilot pragmatic trial has been conducted previously at the Montreal site, evaluating 3 early implementation outcomes: acceptability, feasibility, and engagement. Patient and therapist acceptability was deemed as high and feasible (21/28, 75% of recruited service users completed therapy, rated feasible by therapists). Technology did not appear to significantly impede program participation. Therapist-rated levels of engagement were also satisfactory. In the ongoing study, recruitment is underway (114 participants recruited as of winter 2024), and intervention groups have been conducted at all sites, with therapists receiving training via the E-Cog learning platform (32 enrolled as of winter 2024).

CONCLUSIONS

At least 3 significant innovations will stem from this project. First, this national effort represents a catalyst for the use of digital technologies to increase the adoption of evidence-based interventions and will provide important results on the effectiveness of digitally delivered ABCR and MCT. Second, the results of the implementation component of this study will generate the expertise needed to inform the implementation of similar initiatives. Third, the proposed study will introduce and validate our platform to train and supervise mental health care practitioners to deliver these interventions, which will then be made accessible to the broader mental health community.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05661448; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05661448.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/63269.

摘要

背景

认知障碍是精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSDs)的一个关键方面,对临床和功能结局有重大影响。新冠疫情加剧了人们对心理健康服务和认知刺激机会的担忧。尽管有基于证据的干预措施,如基于行动的认知康复(ABCR)和元认知训练(MCT),但在心理健康环境中应用这些措施时,仍存在研究与实践之间的差距。

目的

iCogCA研究旨在通过加拿大全国范围内的合作,利用数字心理干预措施来增强SSDs患者的认知健康,实施数字ABCR和MCT,以填补这一差距。

方法

该研究涉及加拿大的5个地点。心理健康护理从业者通过我们研究小组开发的E-Cog平台进行数字化培训。在2.5年多的时间里,患有SSDs的参与者将接受干预前后的临床症状、认知和功能评估。每个地点每年将为ABCR和MCT各开展小组活动,总计约390名参与者。将采用非随机同期对照设计评估有效性,其中一种干预措施(如ABCR)作为另一种干预措施(如MCT)的积极对照,反之亦然,使用广义线性混合效应模型比较干预措施之间的认知和临床结局。实施策略评估将考虑数字平台对心理健康护理从业者培训的效果、影响实施的背景因素以及可持续性,定量数据使用描述性统计,定性数据使用主题分析。

结果

此前在蒙特利尔地点进行了一项试点实用性试验,评估了3个早期实施结果:可接受性、可行性和参与度。患者和治疗师的可接受性被认为较高且可行(28名招募的服务使用者中有21名完成了治疗,治疗师认为可行)。技术似乎并未显著阻碍项目参与。治疗师评定的参与度水平也令人满意。在正在进行的研究中,招募工作正在进行(截至2024年冬季已招募114名参与者),所有地点均已开展干预组活动,治疗师通过E-Cog学习平台接受了培训(截至2024年冬季有32名注册)。

结论

该项目至少将产生3项重大创新。首先,这项全国性努力将成为利用数字技术促进循证干预措施采用的催化剂,并将提供有关数字交付的ABCR和MCT有效性的重要结果。其次,本研究实施部分的结果将产生为类似举措的实施提供信息所需的专业知识。第三,拟议的研究将引入并验证我们的平台,以培训和监督心理健康护理从业者实施这些干预措施,然后将该平台提供给更广泛的心理健康社区使用。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05661448;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05661448。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/63269。

相似文献

3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验