Cucchi Angie, Qoronfleh M Walid
School of Social Sciences and Professions, London Metropolitan University, London, United Kingdom.
Healthcare Research & Policy Division, Q3 Research Institute (QRI), Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 2;16:1568861. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1568861. eCollection 2025.
Over the past decade, spirituality and religiosity have gained increasing recognition in the field of mental health, with more individualized approaches emerging. Many mental health professionals have begun integrating aspects of religion and spirituality into their practice and modern psychological therapies have also incorporated principles from ancient Eastern traditions and various worldwide religions. However, these integrations have remained at surface level, assimilating concepts and practices that have been stripped of their ontological framework. The intersection between culture, spirituality and mental wellbeing remains largely underexplored. This can contribute to misunderstandings regarding the conceptualization of mental illness across different cultures and may result in the tokenistic application of ' interventions, which can perpetuate the disillusionment that some individuals may experience towards mental health services. This cultural perspective paper examines the intersection between culture, religious/spiritual beliefs and mental health. It engages with some of the concepts described above and embodies an anti-colonialist stance, demonstrating the authors' commitments toward the decolonization of the field of mental health.
在过去十年中,灵性与宗教信仰在心理健康领域日益受到认可,出现了更多个性化的方法。许多心理健康专业人员已开始将宗教和灵性的各个方面融入他们的实践中,现代心理疗法也纳入了古代东方传统和世界各地各种宗教的原则。然而,这些整合仍停留在表面层面,吸收的概念和实践已被剥离其本体论框架。文化、灵性与心理健康之间的交叉点在很大程度上仍未得到充分探索。这可能导致对不同文化中精神疾病概念化的误解,并可能导致“干预措施”的象征性应用,从而使一些人对心理健康服务可能产生的幻灭感持续存在。这篇文化视角的论文探讨了文化、宗教/精神信仰与心理健康之间的交叉点。它涉及上述一些概念,并体现了反殖民主义立场,展示了作者们对心理健康领域非殖民化的承诺。