Hu Feng, Li Yuancheng, Zeng Hongfei, Ju Renhua, Jiang Di, Zhang Leida, Li Jun, Liu Xingchao, Liu Guangyi, Zhang Chengcheng
Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Chenjiaqiao Hospital of Shapingba District Affiliated to Chongqing Medical and Pharmaceutical College, Chongqing, China.
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 18;16(6):e00843. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000843. eCollection 2025 Jun 1.
The risk factors of biliary complications (BCs) after liver transplantation are not comprehensively determined. BCs also vary in times of onset. Machine learning (ML) can reveal regularities based on large-scale data to make predictions and have demonstrated good performance in liver transplantation. However, whether ML can be an efficient tool for BC prediction was not determined.
Five hundred seventeen patients from 2 centers were enrolled. Patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets at 3:1 ratio. K-fold cross-validation and the synthetic minority oversampling technique were used to debug the models, which were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curves. SHapley Additive exPlanation values and Sankey diagrams were applied to visualize the results. Seven ML algorithms were administrated to build models for BCs prediction at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Among all the models, support vector machine produced the highest area under curve values in predicting BCs (3-month = 0.916; 6-month = 0.892; 12-month = 0.885). According to the analysis of support vector machine, the 3-month risk factors of BCs and corresponding SHapley Additive exPlanation value ranges were donor age (-0.13, 0.21), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (-0.15, 0.18), neoplastic disease (-0.14, 0.28), diabetes (-0.12, 0.27), hypertension (-0.13, 0.21), and intraoperative blood transfusion (-0.09, 0.25), whereas 6-month factors were recipient age (-0.14, 0.16), donor body mass index (-0.10, 0.13), recipient body mass index (-0.13, 0.23), and diabetes (-0.12, 0.43). The 12-month risk factors were recipient age (-0.14, 0.19), diabetes (-0.13, 0.25), and basiliximab (-0.16, 0.24). The Sankey diagram enabled clear visualization of the contribution of individual risk factors to the model in different times of BCs onset.
The ML algorithm was able to identify risk factors of BCs in all postoperative periods and this supplied insights in patient management.
肝移植术后胆道并发症(BCs)的危险因素尚未完全明确。BCs的发病时间也各不相同。机器学习(ML)可以基于大规模数据揭示规律以进行预测,并且在肝移植中已显示出良好的性能。然而,ML是否能成为预测BCs的有效工具尚未确定。
纳入来自2个中心的517例患者。患者按3:1的比例随机分为训练集和验证集。采用K折交叉验证和合成少数过采样技术调试模型,通过受试者工作特征曲线进行评估。应用SHapley加性解释值和桑基图来可视化结果。采用7种ML算法建立3个月、6个月和12个月时BCs预测模型。
在所有模型中,支持向量机在预测BCs时曲线下面积值最高(3个月 = 0.916;6个月 = 0.892;12个月 = 0.885)。根据支持向量机分析,BCs的3个月危险因素及相应的SHapley加性解释值范围为供体年龄(-0.13, 0.21)、终末期肝病模型评分(-0.15, 0.18)、肿瘤性疾病(-0.14, 0.28)、糖尿病(-0.12, 0.27)、高血压(-0.13, 0.21)和术中输血(-0.09, 0.25),而6个月的危险因素为受体年龄(-0.14, 0.16)、供体体重指数(-0.10, 0.13)、受体体重指数(-0.13, 0.23)和糖尿病(-0.12, 0.43)。12个月的危险因素为受体年龄(-0.14, 0.19)、糖尿病(-0.13, 0.25)和巴利昔单抗(-0.16, 0.24)。桑基图能够清晰地可视化不同BCs发病时间各危险因素对模型的贡献。
ML算法能够识别术后各阶段BCs的危险因素,这为患者管理提供了思路。