Berretta Sarah A, Oliver Lindsay D, Hyatt Courtland S, Carrión Ricardo E, Hänsel Katrin, Voineskos Aristotle, Buchanan Robert W, Malhotra Anil K, Tang Sunny X
School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2025 Apr 9;41:100361. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100361. eCollection 2025 Sep.
Aggression in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) is rare but elevated relative to the general population. Existing studies have not identified reliable personal predictors of aggression in SSD. In line with social information processing models suggesting that difficulties interpreting social cues and others' intentions may lead to aggression, we evaluated whether social cognitive domains or global social cognition could be modifiable risk factors in SSD. We examined aggression and social cognition in 59 participants with SSD and 43 healthy volunteers (HV). Self-reported aggression was measured via the Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPAQ). Social cognition was assessed using five tasks measuring emotion processing, theory of mind, and social perception. Group differences were analyzed using Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon tests. Multiple regressions examined effects of social cognition on aggression, controlling for demographic and clinical covariates. Supplemental mediation analyses tested whether impairments in emotion processing, theory of mind, or overall social cognition explained the relationship between SSD diagnosis and increased aggression. Reported aggression was higher in the SSD group, and social cognitive abilities were impaired across domains ( < .001). Better emotion processing (β = -0.35, = .03) and theory of mind (β = -0.32, = .03) predicted lower aggression in SSD, even when accounting for demographic and neurocognitive variables. Exploratory models adjusting for overall psychiatric symptom severity showed that theory of mind remained significant, while emotion processing attenuated. However, social cognition did not mediate the relationship between diagnosis and aggression. Future studies should examine other social processing factors, such as attributional bias.
精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD)中的攻击行为较为罕见,但相对于普通人群有所增加。现有研究尚未确定SSD中攻击行为可靠的个体预测因素。社会信息加工模型表明,难以解读社会线索和他人意图可能导致攻击行为,与此一致,我们评估了社会认知领域或整体社会认知是否可能是SSD中可改变的风险因素。我们对59名SSD患者和43名健康志愿者(HV)的攻击行为和社会认知进行了研究。通过反应性-主动性攻击问卷(RPAQ)测量自我报告的攻击行为。使用五项测量情绪加工、心理理论和社会感知的任务评估社会认知。使用曼-惠特尼-威尔科克森检验分析组间差异。多元回归分析在控制人口统计学和临床协变量的情况下,检验社会认知对攻击行为的影响。补充性中介分析测试情绪加工、心理理论或整体社会认知的损害是否解释了SSD诊断与攻击行为增加之间的关系。SSD组报告的攻击行为更高,且各领域的社会认知能力均受损(P<0.001)。即使在考虑人口统计学和神经认知变量的情况下,更好的情绪加工(β=-0.35,P=0.03)和心理理论(β=-0.32,P=0.03)也预示着SSD患者的攻击行为较低。调整整体精神症状严重程度的探索性模型显示,心理理论仍然显著,而情绪加工的作用减弱。然而,社会认知并未介导诊断与攻击行为之间的关系。未来的研究应考察其他社会加工因素,如归因偏差。