Infante-Amate Juan, Travieso Emiliano, Aguilera Eduardo
Department of Economic Theory and History, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
IC3JM and Figuerola Institute, Department of Social Sciences, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 22;16(1):3766. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58777-4.
'Green growth' is a cornerstone of global sustainability debates and policy agenda. Although there is no consensus definition, it is commonly associated with the absolute decoupling of economic growth from greenhouse gas emissions, which is indeed occurring in high-income countries today. Nevertheless, green growth thus defined could be insufficient to reach global mitigation goals. Here we examine long-term historical data and develop a framework to identify global, regional, and national patterns of decoupling between economic output and anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. We show that 60% of cumulative fossil-fuel CO reduction during 1820-2022 took place under recessions rather than during instances of green growth, with just 5 global crises accounting for about 40%. While in the last 50 years national episodes of green growth became more common, they have not been sustained over time. Crucially, historical episodes compatible with sustained growth and the required emission reductions are anecdotal.
“绿色增长”是全球可持续发展辩论和政策议程的基石。尽管没有共识性定义,但它通常与经济增长与温室气体排放的绝对脱钩相关联,而这在当今高收入国家确实正在发生。然而,如此定义的绿色增长可能不足以实现全球减排目标。在此,我们研究长期历史数据并建立一个框架,以识别经济产出与人为温室气体排放之间脱钩的全球、区域和国家模式。我们表明,1820年至2022年期间,累计化石燃料二氧化碳减排量的60%发生在经济衰退期间,而非绿色增长期间,仅5次全球危机就占了约40%。虽然在过去50年里,各国绿色增长的情况变得更为常见,但随着时间推移并未持续。至关重要的是,与持续增长和所需减排量相符的历史情况只是个例。