• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项国际多中心回顾性队列研究,评估荷兰、法国和英国经验丰富的中心开展的机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术——尤里卡协作研究。

An International Multicentre Retrospective Cohort Study Evaluating Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision in Experienced Dutch, French, and United Kingdom Centres-The EUREKA Collaborative.

作者信息

Geitenbeek Ritch T J, Genders Charlotte M S, Taoum Christophe, Duhoky Rauand, Burghgraef Thijs A, Fleming Christina A, Cotte Eddy, Dubois Anne, Rullier Eric, Denost Quentin, Khan Jim S, Hompes Roel, Rouanet Philippe, Consten Esther C J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, 3813 TZ Amersfoort, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 9;17(8):1268. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081268.

DOI:10.3390/cancers17081268
PMID:40282444
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12026148/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision has been proposed as an alternative to laparoscopic TME for rectal cancer. However, its short-term outcomes and long-term oncological efficacy remain debated, especially in Western populations. This study evaluates the short-term clinical and long-term oncological outcomes of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision performed by experienced surgeons in high-volume European centres.

METHODS

This multicentre, international, retrospective cohort study included 1390 patients from the EUREKA collaborative dataset who underwent robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer between January 2013 and January 2022. All surgeries were performed by expert surgeons beyond the learning curve. Data were analysed for patient demographics, perioperative outcomes, pathological findings, and three-year survival metrics. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate overall and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

Of 1390 patients, 60.6% underwent restorative low anterior resection. Conversion to open surgery occurred in 3.7%, and postoperative complications were reported in 28.7%. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 14.7% of patients who underwent restorative low anterior resection. The median operative time was 223 min. R0 resection was achieved in 94.7%, and circumferential resection margin positivity was 5.5%. Three-year overall survival was 90.1%, disease-free survival was 88.6%, and local recurrence was 2.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision performed by experienced surgeons in high-volume European centres is safe, with low conversion rates, acceptable complication rates, and favourable oncological outcomes. These findings underscore the potential of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision as a standard approach for rectal cancer in specialised settings.

摘要

背景

机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术已被提议作为直肠癌腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术的替代方案。然而,其短期疗效和长期肿瘤学效果仍存在争议,尤其是在西方人群中。本研究评估了欧洲大型中心经验丰富的外科医生进行的机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术的短期临床和长期肿瘤学结果。

方法

这项多中心、国际性、回顾性队列研究纳入了来自EUREKA协作数据集的1390例患者,这些患者在2013年1月至2022年1月期间接受了机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌。所有手术均由超出学习曲线的专家外科医生进行。分析了患者的人口统计学数据、围手术期结果、病理发现和三年生存指标。采用Kaplan-Meier分析评估总生存率和无病生存率。

结果

1390例患者中,60.6%接受了低位前切除术。中转开腹手术的发生率为3.7%,术后并发症发生率为28.7%。接受低位前切除术的患者中,吻合口漏发生率为14.7%。中位手术时间为223分钟。R0切除率为94.7%,环周切缘阳性率为5.5%。三年总生存率为90.1%,无病生存率为88.6%,局部复发率为2.9%。

结论

在欧洲大型中心,经验丰富的外科医生进行的机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术是安全的,中转率低,并发症发生率可接受,肿瘤学效果良好。这些发现强调了机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术在特定环境下作为直肠癌标准治疗方法的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85f3/12026148/404a6e0dbce6/cancers-17-01268-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85f3/12026148/e16d980588da/cancers-17-01268-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85f3/12026148/63588d531a75/cancers-17-01268-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85f3/12026148/404a6e0dbce6/cancers-17-01268-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85f3/12026148/e16d980588da/cancers-17-01268-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85f3/12026148/63588d531a75/cancers-17-01268-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85f3/12026148/404a6e0dbce6/cancers-17-01268-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
An International Multicentre Retrospective Cohort Study Evaluating Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision in Experienced Dutch, French, and United Kingdom Centres-The EUREKA Collaborative.一项国际多中心回顾性队列研究,评估荷兰、法国和英国经验丰富的中心开展的机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术——尤里卡协作研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 9;17(8):1268. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081268.
2
Ten years of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer (short-term RESOLUTION).机器人辅助与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的十年比较(短期RESOLUTION研究)
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Aug 1;117(8):1614-1626. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaf084.
3
Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis in Experienced Centers.机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术的比较:经验丰富中心的回顾性倾向评分匹配队列分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Feb 1;65(2):218-227. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002031.
4
Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision surgery for rectal cancer: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study of short-term outcomes.腹腔镜与机器人辅助与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的比较:短期结局的回顾性倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Br J Surg. 2021 Nov 11;108(11):1380-1387. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab233.
5
[Safety and prognosis analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer].经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的安全性及预后分析
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 25;25(6):522-530. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20210811-00321.
6
Total mesorectal excision in MRI-defined low rectal cancer: multicentre study comparing oncological outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic and transanal total mesorectal excision in high-volume centres.MRI 定义低位直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术:机器人、腹腔镜和经肛门全直肠系膜切除术在高容量中心的比较肿瘤学结果的多中心研究。
BJS Open. 2024 May 8;8(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae029.
7
Analysis of Local Recurrence After Robotic-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision (ALRITE): An International, Multicentre, Retrospective Cohort.机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术局部复发分析(ALRITE):一项国际多中心回顾性队列研究
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 15;17(6):992. doi: 10.3390/cancers17060992.
8
Local recurrence of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision: a multicentre cohort study evaluating the initial cases.机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术的局部复发:一项评估初始病例的多中心队列研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Jul;37(7):1635-1645. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04199-3. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
9
Oncological safety of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: mid-term results of a prospective multicentre study.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)治疗直肠癌的肿瘤安全性:一项前瞻性多中心研究的中期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Apr;35(4):1808-1819. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07579-4. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
10
Implementation of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision by multiple surgeons in a large teaching hospital: Morbidity, long-term oncological and functional outcome.多名外科医生在大型教学医院实施机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术:发病率、长期肿瘤学和功能结果。
Int J Med Robot. 2021 Jun;17(3):e2227. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2227. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Rectal cancer - French intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up (TNCD, SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, ACHBT, SFP, RENAPE, SNFCP, AFEF, SFR, and GRECCAR).直肠癌——法国多学科临床实践诊断、治疗及随访指南(TNCD、SNFGE、FFCD、GERCOR、UNICANCER、SFCD、SFED、SFRO、ACHBT、SFP、RENAPE、SNFCP、AFEF、SFR和GRECCAR)
Dig Liver Dis. 2025 Mar;57(3):669-679. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.004. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
2
A Prospective European Trial Comparing Laparotomy, Laparoscopy, Robotic-Assisted, and Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Procedures in High-Risk Patients with Rectal Cancer: The RESET Trial.一项欧洲前瞻性试验:比较开腹手术、腹腔镜手术、机器人辅助手术及经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗高危直肠癌患者——RESET试验
Ann Surg. 2024 Sep 12. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006534.
3
Multicentre cohort study evaluating clinical, oncological and functional outcomes following robotic rectal cancer surgery-the EUREKA collaborative: trial protocol.多中心队列研究评估机器人直肠癌手术后的临床、肿瘤学和功能结局——EUREKA协作组:试验方案
BJS Open. 2024 Mar 1;8(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae019.
4
Assessing the learning curve of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision: a multicenter study considering procedural safety, pathological safety, and efficiency.评估机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术的学习曲线:考虑手术安全性、病理安全性和效率的多中心研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jan 11;38(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04303-7.
5
Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Surgery for Rectal Cancers: The COLRAR Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜与机器人辅助手术治疗直肠癌的比较:COLRAR 随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2023 Jul 1;278(1):31-38. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005788. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
6
Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌(REAL):一项多中心随机对照试验的短期结果
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Nov;7(11):991-1004. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00248-5. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
7
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX and preoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (UNICANCER-PRODIGE 23): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.局部晚期直肠癌患者的 FOLFIRINOX 新辅助化疗和术前放化疗(UNICANCER-PRODIGE 23):一项多中心、随机、开放标签、III 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 May;22(5):702-715. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00079-6. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
8
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2020 Sep;16(5):979-989. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_533_18.
9
Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: the risk is functional rather than oncological. A 25-year experience from Bordeaux.经肛门内外括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌:风险是功能性的而不是肿瘤学上的。来自波尔多的 25 年经验。
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Nov;22(11):1603-1613. doi: 10.1111/codi.15258. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
10
Risk of local recurrence of rectal cancer and circumferential resection margin: population-based cohort study.直肠癌局部复发和环周切缘的风险:基于人群的队列研究。
Br J Surg. 2020 Apr;107(5):580-585. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11478. Epub 2020 Mar 5.