Shankar Ravi, Devi Fiona, Mukhopadhyay Amartya
Medical Affairs - Research Innovation & Enterprise, Alexandra Hospital, Singapore
National University Health System, Singapore.
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 27;15(4):e100238. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100238.
Value-based care focuses on delivering high-quality care while managing costs. Generalist-led hospital models, with generalist physicians playing a central role, have emerged as an approach to achieve value-based care goals. However, the evidence on their effectiveness remains mixed. This systematic review will synthesise evidence on the impact of generalist-led models on patient outcomes, healthcare costs and resource utilisation compared with traditional models.
We will search PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, Medline, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Scopus from inception to present for studies comparing generalist-led hospital models with traditional specialist-led or other models. Observational studies and randomised trials will be included. The primary outcomes are patient mortality, morbidity, satisfaction, healthcare costs, length of stay, readmissions and consultations. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data and assess quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomised trials. A narrative synthesis will be conducted, with a meta-analysis if appropriate. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation will assess certainty of evidence. Heterogeneity will be explored through subgroup analyses and meta-regression. The review will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
Ethical approval is not required as this is a protocol for a systematic review with no primary data collection. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and stakeholder engagement activities.
CRD42024600155.
基于价值的医疗保健注重在控制成本的同时提供高质量的医疗服务。以全科医生为主导、全科医生发挥核心作用的医院模式,已成为实现基于价值的医疗保健目标的一种途径。然而,关于其有效性的证据仍存在分歧。本系统评价将综合对比全科医生主导模式与传统模式对患者结局、医疗保健成本和资源利用影响的证据。
我们将检索PubMed、科学网、Embase、护理学与健康领域数据库、医学在线数据库、考克兰图书馆、心理学文摘数据库和Scopus,检索时间从建库至当前,以查找比较全科医生主导的医院模式与传统专科医生主导模式或其他模式的研究。纳入观察性研究和随机试验。主要结局包括患者死亡率、发病率、满意度、医疗保健成本、住院时间、再入院率和会诊次数。两名评价者将独立筛选研究、提取数据,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估观察性研究的质量,使用考克兰偏倚风险工具评估随机试验的质量。将进行叙述性综合分析,如有合适的数据将进行荟萃分析。推荐意见评估、制定与评价分级将评估证据的确定性。将通过亚组分析和荟萃回归探讨异质性。本评价将遵循系统评价与荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南。
由于这是一项无需收集原始数据的系统评价方案,因此无需伦理批准。研究结果将通过同行评审出版物、会议报告和利益相关者参与活动进行传播。
PROSPERO注册号:CRD42024600155。