• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大学生的数据素养自我评估:一项效度研究。

University students' self-assessment of data literacy: A validation study.

作者信息

Kim Jeonghyun, Hong Lingzi, Yoon Ayoung

机构信息

Department of Information Science, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, United States of America.

Anuradha and Vikas Sinha Department of Data Science, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Apr 28;20(4):e0322104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322104. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0322104
PMID:40294036
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12036854/
Abstract

As data literacy has emerged as a critical skill for professionals across industries, educators in higher education have incorporated it into their curricula and instruction. Understanding and evaluating the factors that shape an individual's data literacy is important for benchmarking proficiency and tailoring curricula, yet the underlying components and structure of data literacy for students in four-year institutions are unknown. This study validated the Data Literacy Self-Efficacy Scale (DLSES) with 1,816 students enrolled in two four-year institutions. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to determine the construct of the scale, and the item analysis was used to address the validity of the items on the scale. The exploratory factor analysis identified eight distinct factors comprising 29 items. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed a good model fit, CFI = 0.994, TLI = 0.994, RMSEA = 0.053, SRMR = 0.044. This study demonstrated the 29-item refined version of the DLSES to be a reliable and valid tool for measuring individuals' self-efficacy levels for data literacy. Furthermore, the scale could form the basis for curriculum development and help educators design targeted interventions that address specific learning needs.

摘要

随着数据素养已成为各行各业专业人士的一项关键技能,高等教育领域的教育工作者已将其纳入课程和教学中。了解和评估影响个人数据素养的因素对于衡量能力水平和量身定制课程很重要,但四年制院校学生数据素养的潜在组成部分和结构尚不清楚。本研究对1816名就读于两所四年制院校的学生进行了数据素养自我效能量表(DLSES)的验证。进行了探索性和验证性因素分析以确定该量表的结构,并使用项目分析来检验量表上各项目的有效性。探索性因素分析确定了由29个项目组成的八个不同因素。验证性因素分析结果显示模型拟合良好,CFI = 0.994,TLI = 0.994,RMSEA = 0.053,SRMR = 0.044。本研究表明,DLSES的29个项目精炼版是测量个人数据素养自我效能水平的可靠且有效的工具。此外,该量表可为课程开发奠定基础,并帮助教育工作者设计针对特定学习需求的有针对性的干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1764/12036854/7c7fbb8b6195/pone.0322104.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1764/12036854/7c7fbb8b6195/pone.0322104.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1764/12036854/7c7fbb8b6195/pone.0322104.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
University students' self-assessment of data literacy: A validation study.大学生的数据素养自我评估:一项效度研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 28;20(4):e0322104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322104. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluating the construct validity of the health promotion literacy scale: a confirmatory factor analysis in Taiwan's university social responsibility context.评估健康促进素养量表的结构效度:台湾大学社会责任背景下的验证性因素分析
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Mar 24;25(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06992-4.
3
Measuring a Broad Spectrum of eHealth Skills in the Web 3.0 Context Using an eHealth Literacy Scale: Development and Validation Study.在 Web 3.0 背景下使用电子健康素养量表衡量广泛的电子健康技能:开发和验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 23;23(9):e31627. doi: 10.2196/31627.
4
Validation and measurement invariance of the Chinese version of the academic self-efficacy scale for university students.大学生学业自我效能感量表中文版的验证和测量不变性。
PeerJ. 2024 Sep 24;12:e17798. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17798. eCollection 2024.
5
Development and reliability and validity testing of a medication literacy scale for medical college students.医学生药物素养量表的编制及信度、效度检验。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 31;24(1):1238. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06222-3.
6
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version physical literacy assessment questionnaire among high school students in Gansu, China.中文版身体素养评估问卷在中国甘肃高中生中的心理测量学特性
PeerJ. 2025 Apr 9;13:e19093. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19093. eCollection 2025.
7
Development and validation of the Information Literacy Measurement Scale (ILMS-34) in Chinese public health practitioners.中国公共卫生从业者信息素养测评量表(ILMS - 34)的编制与验证
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 16;25(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06693-y.
8
Validity and reliability of a physical literacy knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy and behaviors questionnaire for early childhood educators (PLKASB-ECE): An exploratory factor analysis.适用于幼儿教育工作者的身体素养知识、态度、自我效能和行为问卷(PLKASB-ECE)的有效性和可靠性:探索性因素分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 28;19(10):e0312736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312736. eCollection 2024.
9
The Arabic Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) and its three-item version: Factor structure and measurement invariance among university students.阿拉伯语版生活满意度量表(SWLS)及其三项版本:大学生中的因素结构与测量不变性
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 May;255:104867. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104867. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
10
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Environmental Health Literacy Scale.《环境卫生素养量表》土耳其语版本的效度与信度
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e14289. doi: 10.1111/jep.14289.

本文引用的文献

1
Reframing data ethics in research methods education: a pathway to critical data literacy.在研究方法教育中重新构建数据伦理:通往批判性数据素养之路。
Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2023;20(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00380-y. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
2
Dealing with Careless Responding in Survey Data: Prevention, Identification, and Recommended Best Practices.处理调查数据中的粗心作答:预防、识别及推荐的最佳实践
Annu Rev Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;74:577-596. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-040422-045007. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
3
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.
结构效度:客观测量工具的新发展。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1412-1427. doi: 10.1037/pas0000626. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
4
Very Simple Structure: An Alternative Procedure For Estimating The Optimal Number Of Interpretable Factors.非常简单的结构:一种估计可解释因子最优数量的替代方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1979 Oct 1;14(4):403-14. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1404_2.