• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项多中心回顾性研究中基于人工智能的脓毒性休克多专科死亡率预测模型

Artificial intelligence based multispecialty mortality prediction models for septic shock in a multicenter retrospective study.

作者信息

Wang Shurui, Liu Xinyi, Yuan Shaohua, Bian Yi, Wu Hong, Ye Qing

机构信息

Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Apr 28;8(1):228. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01643-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41746-025-01643-w
PMID:40295871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12037723/
Abstract

Septic shock is one of the most lethal conditions in ICU, and early risk prediction may help reduce mortality. We developed a TOPSIS-based Classification Fusion (TCF) model to predict mortality risk in septic shock patients using data from 4872 ICU patients from February 2003 to November 2023 across three hospitals. The model integrates seven machine learning models via the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), achieving AUCs of 0.733 in internal validation, 0.808 in the pediatric ICU, 0.662 in the respiratory ICU, with external validation AUCs of 0.784 and 0.786, respectively. It demonstrated high stability and accuracy in cross-specialty and multi-center validation. This interpretable model provides clinicians with a reliable early-warning tool for septic shock mortality risk, facilitating early intervention to reduce mortality.

摘要

感染性休克是重症监护病房(ICU)中最致命的病症之一,早期风险预测可能有助于降低死亡率。我们开发了一种基于逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)的分类融合(TCF)模型,利用2003年2月至2023年11月期间来自三家医院的4872例ICU患者的数据来预测感染性休克患者的死亡风险。该模型通过逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)整合了七个机器学习模型,内部验证的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.733,儿科ICU为0.808,呼吸ICU为0.662,外部验证的AUC分别为0.784和0.786。它在跨专业和多中心验证中表现出高稳定性和准确性。这个可解释的模型为临床医生提供了一个可靠的感染性休克死亡风险早期预警工具,有助于早期干预以降低死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbe/12037723/fa8b80e94b94/41746_2025_1643_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbe/12037723/522867f3748d/41746_2025_1643_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbe/12037723/2096f7a544c5/41746_2025_1643_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbe/12037723/74a1d8b4bb96/41746_2025_1643_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbe/12037723/9d25a3d02dfb/41746_2025_1643_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbe/12037723/b59507048b54/41746_2025_1643_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbe/12037723/ddd8cbaec7c2/41746_2025_1643_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbe/12037723/fa8b80e94b94/41746_2025_1643_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbe/12037723/522867f3748d/41746_2025_1643_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbe/12037723/2096f7a544c5/41746_2025_1643_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbe/12037723/74a1d8b4bb96/41746_2025_1643_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbe/12037723/9d25a3d02dfb/41746_2025_1643_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbe/12037723/b59507048b54/41746_2025_1643_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbe/12037723/ddd8cbaec7c2/41746_2025_1643_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbe/12037723/fa8b80e94b94/41746_2025_1643_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Artificial intelligence based multispecialty mortality prediction models for septic shock in a multicenter retrospective study.一项多中心回顾性研究中基于人工智能的脓毒性休克多专科死亡率预测模型
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Apr 28;8(1):228. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01643-w.
2
Explainable Machine-Learning Model for Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality in Septic Patients Requiring Intensive Care Unit Readmission.用于预测需要再次入住重症监护病房的脓毒症患者院内死亡率的可解释机器学习模型
Infect Dis Ther. 2022 Aug;11(4):1695-1713. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00671-3. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
3
Development and Validation of Deep-Learning-Based Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Prediction System (DeepSEPS) Using Real-World ICU Data.基于深度学习的脓毒症和脓毒性休克早期预测系统(DeepSEPS)的开发与验证:使用真实世界重症监护病房数据
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 17;12(22):7156. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227156.
4
Interpretable machine learning for 28-day all-cause in-hospital mortality prediction in critically ill patients with heart failure combined with hypertension: A retrospective cohort study based on medical information mart for intensive care database-IV and eICU databases.用于预测心力衰竭合并高血压重症患者28天全因院内死亡率的可解释机器学习:一项基于重症监护医学信息集市数据库-IV和电子重症监护病房数据库的回顾性队列研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 12;9:994359. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.994359. eCollection 2022.
5
Development and validation of a deep learning-based framework for automated lung CT segmentation and acute respiratory distress syndrome prediction: a multicenter cohort study.基于深度学习的自动肺CT分割和急性呼吸窘迫综合征预测框架的开发与验证:一项多中心队列研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Jul 26;75:102772. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102772. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
Interpretable machine learning for predicting 28-day all-cause in-hospital mortality for hypertensive ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke patients in the ICU: a multi-center retrospective cohort study with internal and external cross-validation.用于预测重症监护病房中高血压性缺血性或出血性中风患者28天全因院内死亡率的可解释机器学习:一项具有内部和外部交叉验证的多中心回顾性队列研究
Front Neurol. 2023 Aug 8;14:1185447. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1185447. eCollection 2023.
7
The Development and Validation of Simplified Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Prognosis of Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: Multicenter, Retrospective Study.中文译文:简化机器学习算法预测 COVID-19 住院患者预后的开发和验证:多中心回顾性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 21;24(1):e31549. doi: 10.2196/31549.
8
[Establishment of a nomogram prediction model for 28-day mortality of septic shock patients based on routine laboratory data mining].基于常规实验室数据挖掘的脓毒性休克患者28天死亡率列线图预测模型的建立
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Nov;36(11):1127-1132. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240202-00108.
9
[Constructing a predictive model for the death risk of patients with septic shock based on supervised machine learning algorithms].基于监督机器学习算法构建脓毒症休克患者死亡风险预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Apr;36(4):345-352. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230930-00832.
10
Early Detection of Septic Shock Onset Using Interpretable Machine Learners.使用可解释机器学习算法早期检测脓毒症休克发作
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 15;10(2):301. doi: 10.3390/jcm10020301.

引用本文的文献

1
Gut Microbiota Metabolites Targeting the Immune Response in Sepsis: Mechanisms and Therapies.靶向脓毒症免疫反应的肠道微生物群代谢产物:机制与疗法
Int J Gen Med. 2025 Aug 25;18:4709-4734. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S539237. eCollection 2025.
2
Septic Shock in Hematological Malignancies: Role of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Outcomes.血液系统恶性肿瘤中的感染性休克:人工智能在预测预后中的作用。
Curr Oncol. 2025 Aug 10;32(8):450. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32080450.

本文引用的文献

1
TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods.TRIPOD+AI 声明:报告使用回归或机器学习方法的临床预测模型的更新指南。
BMJ. 2024 Apr 16;385:e078378. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078378.
2
A novel decision support system for proactive risk management in healthcare based on fuzzy inference, neural network and support vector machine.一种基于模糊推理、神经网络和支持向量机的医疗保健主动风险管理新型决策支持系统。
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Jun;186:105442. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105442. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
3
Artificial intelligence-based models enabling accurate diagnosis of ovarian cancer using laboratory tests in China: a multicentre, retrospective cohort study.
基于人工智能的模型利用实验室检测在中国实现卵巢癌的准确诊断:一项多中心、回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2024 Mar;6(3):e176-e186. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00245-5. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
4
Determinants of Inadequate Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy in ICU Sepsis Patients in Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia: A Comparison of Artificial Neural Network and Regression Analysis.沙特麦地那穆纳瓦拉重症监护病房脓毒症患者经验性抗菌治疗不足的决定因素:人工神经网络与回归分析的比较
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Aug 10;12(8):1305. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12081305.
5
Predicting sepsis using deep learning across international sites: a retrospective development and validation study.利用深度学习在国际多中心预测脓毒症:一项回顾性开发与验证研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Aug 11;62:102124. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102124. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Artificial intelligence technologies and compassion in healthcare: A systematic scoping review.医疗保健中的人工智能技术与人文关怀:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 17;13:971044. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971044. eCollection 2022.
7
Explanation of machine learning models using shapley additive explanation and application for real data in hospital.使用 Shapley 加法解释对机器学习模型进行解释,并将其应用于医院的真实数据。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Feb;214:106584. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106584. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
8
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
9
Machine learning for early detection of sepsis: an internal and temporal validation study.用于脓毒症早期检测的机器学习:一项内部及时间验证研究。
JAMIA Open. 2020 Apr 11;3(2):252-260. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa006. eCollection 2020 Jul.
10
Mortality in sepsis and septic shock in Europe, North America and Australia between 2009 and 2019- results from a systematic review and meta-analysis.2009 年至 2019 年期间欧洲、北美和澳大利亚脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的死亡率:系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。
Crit Care. 2020 May 19;24(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02950-2.