Suppr超能文献

一项关于不使用传感器数据预测老年人跌倒风险的机器学习模型的范围综述。

A scoping review of machine learning models to predict risk of falls in elders, without using sensor data.

作者信息

Capodici Angelo, Fanconi Claudio, Curtin Catherine, Shapiro Alessandro, Noci Francesca, Giannoni Alberto, Hernandez-Boussard Tina

机构信息

Department of Health Management (Direzione Sanitaria), IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, 40127, Italy.

Interdisciplinary Research Center for Health Science, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, 56127, Italy.

出版信息

Diagn Progn Res. 2025 May 6;9(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s41512-025-00190-y.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This scoping review assesses machine learning (ML) tools that predicted falls, relying on information in health records without using any sensor data. The aim was to assess the available evidence on innovative techniques to improve fall prevention management.

METHODS

Studies were included if they focused on predicting fall risk with machine learning in elderly populations and were written in English. There were 13 different extracted variables, including population characteristics (community dwelling, inpatients, age range, main pathology, ethnicity/race). Furthermore, the number of variables used in the final models, as well as their type, was extracted.

RESULTS

A total of 6331 studies were retrieved, and 19 articles met criteria for data extraction. Metric performances reported by authors were commonly high in terms of accuracy (e.g., greater than 0.70). The most represented features included cardiovascular status and mobility assessments. Common gaps identified included a lack of transparent reporting and insufficient fairness assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides evidence that falls can be predicted using ML without using sensors if the amount of data and its quality is adequate. However, further studies are needed to validate these models in diverse groups and populations.

摘要

目标

本范围综述评估了依靠健康记录中的信息而非使用任何传感器数据来预测跌倒的机器学习(ML)工具。目的是评估关于改善跌倒预防管理的创新技术的现有证据。

方法

纳入的研究需聚焦于使用机器学习预测老年人群的跌倒风险且为英文撰写。共提取了13个不同变量,包括人群特征(社区居住、住院患者、年龄范围、主要病理、种族/民族)。此外,还提取了最终模型中使用的变量数量及其类型。

结果

共检索到6331项研究,19篇文章符合数据提取标准。作者报告的指标性能在准确性方面通常较高(例如,大于0.70)。最具代表性的特征包括心血管状况和活动能力评估。发现的常见差距包括缺乏透明报告和公平性评估不足。

结论

本综述提供的证据表明,如果数据量及其质量足够,不使用传感器也可利用机器学习预测跌倒。然而,需要进一步研究在不同群体和人群中验证这些模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9ae/12054167/88ecf668339f/41512_2025_190_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验