• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Continuous monitoring of human contingency judgment across trials.

作者信息

Shanks D R

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1985 Mar;13(2):158-67. doi: 10.3758/bf03197008.

DOI:10.3758/bf03197008
PMID:4033418
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Continuous monitoring of human contingency judgment across trials.
Mem Cognit. 1985 Mar;13(2):158-67. doi: 10.3758/bf03197008.
2
Evaluative conditioning and the awareness issue: assessing contingency awareness with the four-picture recognition test.评价性条件作用与意识问题：用四图片识别测试评估偶然性意识
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Oct;32(4):454-9. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.4.454.
3
Does evaluative learning rely on the perception of contingency?: manipulating contingency and US density during evaluative conditioning.
Exp Psychol. 2011;58(5):391-9. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000108.
4
The effects of assessment type on verbal ratings of conditional stimulus valence and contingency judgments: implications for the extinction of evaluative learning.评估类型对条件刺激效价的言语评定及意外性判断的影响：对评价性学习消退的启示
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Oct;32(4):431-40. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.4.431.
5
Cue interaction in human contingency judgment.
Mem Cognit. 1990 Sep;18(5):537-45. doi: 10.3758/bf03198486.
6
Semantic differential judgments of single and multiple conditioned stimuli with an aversive delay conditioning paradigm.采用厌恶延迟条件作用范式对单一和多个条件刺激进行语义差异判断。
J Exp Psychol. 1971 Aug;89(2):398-402. doi: 10.1037/h0031171.
7
Comparing associative, statistical, and inferential reasoning accounts of human contingency learning.比较人类偶然性学习中的联想、统计和推理推理账户。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Mar;60(3):310-29. doi: 10.1080/17470210601000680.
8
Implicit misattribution of evaluative responses: contingency-unaware evaluative conditioning requires simultaneous stimulus presentations.内隐归因错误：无意识条件作用下的评价性条件反射需要同时呈现刺激。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Aug;142(3):638-43. doi: 10.1037/a0029989. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
9
Singular clues to causality and their use in human causal judgment.因果关系的独特线索及其在人类因果判断中的应用。
Cogn Sci. 2014 Jan-Feb;38(1):38-75. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12075. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
10
Contingency bias in probability judgement may arise from ambiguity regarding additional causes.概率判断中的偶然偏差可能源于对其他原因的模糊性。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013 Sep;66(9):1675-86. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.752854. Epub 2013 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
The tendency to stop collecting information is linked to illusions of causality.人们停止收集信息的趋势与因果幻觉有关。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 16;11(1):3942. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82075-w.
2
Anomalies in the detection of change: When changes in sample size are mistaken for changes in proportions.变化检测中的异常情况：当样本量的变化被误认为是比例的变化时。
Mem Cognit. 2016 Jan;44(1):143-61. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0537-z.
3
Time in action contexts: learning when an action effect occurs.在动作情境中学习：了解动作效果发生的时间。

本文引用的文献

1
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.《不确定性下的判断：启发式与偏差》
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
2
A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.一种巴甫洛夫式学习模型：条件刺激而非无条件刺激有效性的变化。
Psychol Rev. 1980 Nov;87(6):532-52.
3
Assessment of covariation by humans and animals: the joint influence of prior expectations and current situational information.
Psychol Res. 2012 May;76(3):336-44. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0341-8. Epub 2011 May 17.
4
Accounting for occurrences: an explanation for some novel tendencies in causal judgment from contingency information.对事件的解释：基于偶然性信息的因果判断中一些新趋势的一种解释。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Jun;37(4):500-13. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.4.500.
5
The influence of temporal distributions on causal induction from tabular data.时间分布对基于表格数据的因果归纳的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2007 Apr;35(3):444-53. doi: 10.3758/bf03193284.
6
Causal judgment from contingency information: a systematic test of the pCI rule.基于偶然性信息的因果判断：pCI规则的系统测试
Mem Cognit. 2004 Apr;32(3):353-68. doi: 10.3758/bf03195830.
7
Asymptotic judgment of cause in a relative validity paradigm.相对有效性范式下病因的渐近判断
Mem Cognit. 2000 Apr;28(3):466-79. doi: 10.3758/bf03198561.
8
The impact of motor responses on serial-pattern learning.运动反应对序列模式学习的影响。
Psychol Res. 1994;57(1):30-41. doi: 10.1007/BF00452993.
9
Cue interaction in human contingency judgment.
Mem Cognit. 1990 Sep;18(5):537-45. doi: 10.3758/bf03198486.
Psychol Rev. 1984 Jan;91(1):112-49.
4
Conditioned inhibition of fear resulting from negative CS-US contingencies.由负性条件刺激-无条件刺激联结所导致的恐惧条件性抑制。
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1969 Apr;67(4):504-9. doi: 10.1037/h0027313.
5
Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning.在恐惧条件反射中存在和不存在条件刺激（CS）时休克的概率。
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1968 Aug;66(1):1-5. doi: 10.1037/h0025984.
6
Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser?抑郁和非抑郁学生的偶然性判断：越悲伤越明智？
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1979 Dec;108(4):441-85. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.108.4.441.