• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“富有同理心、善于包容,不仅要包容与你交谈的人,也要包容自己”——一项关于对姑息治疗患者进行访谈的准备与实施的定性研究。

"Being empathetic, being accommodating, not only to the person you're talking to, but also to yourself"- a qualitative study on preparing and conducting interviews with palliative care patients.

作者信息

Giehl Chantal, Suslow Anastasia, Vollmar Horst Christian, Chikhradze Nino, Otte Ina Carola

机构信息

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany.

Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine (AM RUB), Medical Faculty, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2025 May 7;24(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01769-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12904-025-01769-4
PMID:40336060
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12057236/
Abstract

This study explores the necessary considerations for preparing and conducting qualitative interviews with palliative care patients and their relatives. Palliative care patients are considered a vulnerable group, which raises ethical and methodological challenges for researchers. The study aims to address these challenges by emphasizing the importance of the relationship between researcher and participant, sensitive communication, and continuous self-reflection throughout the research process. Six semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals in the field of palliative care. The results highlight four major themes that are constantly interacting and interrelated: relationship, communication, self-reflection and research framework. These factors are crucial in balancing the needs of participants with the demands of qualitative research. The findings suggest that a patient-centred, needs-oriented approach is fundamental to the collection of high-quality data, while simultaneously ensuring the well-being of both participants and researchers.

摘要

本研究探讨了对姑息治疗患者及其亲属进行定性访谈的准备和实施过程中的必要考量。姑息治疗患者被视为弱势群体,这给研究人员带来了伦理和方法上的挑战。该研究旨在通过强调研究人员与参与者之间关系的重要性、敏感沟通以及在整个研究过程中持续的自我反思来应对这些挑战。对姑息治疗领域的医疗专业人员进行了六次半结构化访谈。结果突出了四个不断相互作用和相互关联的主要主题:关系、沟通、自我反思和研究框架。这些因素对于平衡参与者的需求与定性研究的要求至关重要。研究结果表明,以患者为中心、以需求为导向的方法是收集高质量数据的基础,同时确保参与者和研究人员双方的福祉。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65a0/12057236/d11f3f767f96/12904_2025_1769_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65a0/12057236/d11f3f767f96/12904_2025_1769_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65a0/12057236/d11f3f767f96/12904_2025_1769_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
"Being empathetic, being accommodating, not only to the person you're talking to, but also to yourself"- a qualitative study on preparing and conducting interviews with palliative care patients.“富有同理心、善于包容,不仅要包容与你交谈的人,也要包容自己”——一项关于对姑息治疗患者进行访谈的准备与实施的定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 May 7;24(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01769-4.
2
Emotional labour in palliative and end-of-life care communication: A qualitative study with generalist palliative care providers.在姑息治疗和临终关怀沟通中的情绪劳动:一项与通科姑息治疗提供者的定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Mar;102(3):494-502. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
3
Considerations and recommendations for conducting qualitative research interviews with palliative and end-of-life care patients in the home setting: a consensus paper.关于在家中对姑息治疗和临终关怀患者进行定性研究访谈的考量与建议:一份共识文件。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Mar;9(1):e14. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000892. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
4
"Starting to think that way from the start": approaching deprescribing decision-making for people accessing palliative care - a qualitative exploration of healthcare professionals views.“从一开始就那样想”:对接受姑息治疗的人群进行逐渐减药决策——对医疗保健专业人员观点的定性探索。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Sep 6;23(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01523-2.
5
Need and challenges of palliative care in tribal people: a qualitative analysis.部落人群姑息治疗的需求与挑战:一项定性分析
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Mar 20;24(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01711-8.
6
"I go into crisis when …": ethics of care and moral dilemmas in palliative care.“我陷入危机是因为……”:关怀伦理与缓和医疗中的道德困境。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Aug 9;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0453-2.
7
Health-oriented leadership in specialized outpatient palliative care teams in Germany: a qualitative study with palliative care professionals.德国专科门诊姑息治疗团队中以健康为导向的领导力:一项对姑息治疗专业人员的定性研究
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Mar 28;24(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01721-6.
8
Palliative care: a foreign language? Nurses' perspectives on palliative care in a French comprehensive cancer centre.姑息治疗:一门外语?法国一家综合性癌症中心护士对姑息治疗的看法。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Mar 13;24(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01678-6.
9
A qualitative analysis of patient and family perspectives of palliative care.对患者及家属姑息治疗观点的定性分析。
J Palliat Med. 2015 Mar;18(3):282-5. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0155. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
10
Solicitude: balancing compassion and empowerment in a relational ethics of hope-an empirical-ethical study in palliative care.关怀:在希望的关系伦理中平衡同情与赋权——姑息治疗中的一项实证伦理研究
Med Health Care Philos. 2016 Mar;19(1):11-20. doi: 10.1007/s11019-015-9642-9.

本文引用的文献

1
How palliative care professionals develop coping competence through their career: A grounded theory.姑息治疗专业人员如何通过职业生涯发展应对能力:扎根理论。
Palliat Med. 2024 Mar;38(3):284-296. doi: 10.1177/02692163241229961. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
2
[DNVF Memorandum: Health Services Research in the Last Year of Life].[DNVF 备忘录:生命最后一年的卫生服务研究]
Gesundheitswesen. 2022 Oct 11. doi: 10.1055/a-1889-4705.
3
A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149.质性研究中反思性的实用指南:AMEE指南第149号
Med Teach. 2022 Apr 7:1-11. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287.
4
: Marking Its Fortieth Anniversary.纪念其四十周年。
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Nov;19(11):9-12. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1665402.
5
Identifying and evaluating layers of vulnerability - a way forward.识别和评估脆弱性层次——前进的道路。
Dev World Bioeth. 2019 Jun;19(2):86-95. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12206. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
6
Qualitative Research in Palliative Care: Applications to Clinical Trials Work.姑息治疗中的定性研究:在临床试验工作中的应用
J Palliat Med. 2017 Aug;20(8):857-861. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0061. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
7
Researcher-researched relationship in qualitative research: Shifts in positions and researcher vulnerability.定性研究中的研究者与被研究者关系:立场转变与研究者的易受伤害性
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2016 Jun 14;11:30996. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v11.30996. eCollection 2016.
8
Ethical challenges in qualitative research: examples from practice.定性研究中的伦理挑战:实践案例
Nurse Res. 2010;18(1):15-25. doi: 10.7748/nr2010.10.18.1.15.c8044.
9
Empathy and patient-physician conflicts.同理心与医患冲突。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 May;22(5):696-700. doi: 10.1007/s11606-006-0102-3.
10
Key challenges and ways forward in researching the "good death": qualitative in-depth interview and focus group study.研究“善终”的关键挑战与未来方向:定性深入访谈和焦点小组研究
BMJ. 2007 Mar 10;334(7592):521. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39097.582639.55. Epub 2007 Feb 28.