Stark Lea, Triolo Federico, Vetrano Davide Liborio, Rizzuto Debora, Contador Israel, Calderón-Larrañaga Amaia, Dekhtyar Serhiy
Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Aging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Solna, Sweden.
Stockholm Gerontology Research Center, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2025 Jun 10;80(7). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaf101.
Physical resilience (PR), the ability to recover from health adversities, is thought to buffer health challenges during aging. However, PR's association with mortality and its ability to offset the negative effects of genetic susceptibility to shorter lifespan remains unknown.
Data on 3 041 individuals (age: 60+) from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen (SNAC-K) were analyzed. Physical resilience was assessed at baseline (2001-2004) using residual gait speed for a given level of chronic diseases, medications, and sociodemographics, categorized as low (residual SD's ≤ -1), moderate (-1 < SD < 1), or high resilience (SD ≥ 1). A genetic risk score was derived from 4 single nucleotide polymorphisms linked to longevity (hTERT, APOE, TOMM40, IGF-1R). Cox proportional hazard models and Laplace regression examined 18-year mortality and median survival, respectively. Physical resilience was assessed as the moderator of the genetic risk score-mortality association in stratified analysis.
Compared to individuals with moderate PR, those with low resilience had higher mortality risk (HR: 1.28; 95% CI [1.09, 1.51]), with the opposite pattern in those with high PR (HR: 0.71; 95% CI [0.60, 0.84]). Above-median levels of genetic risk score were associated with increased mortality risk (HR: 1.34; 95% CI [1.18, 1.52]). Stratified by PR, mortality risk associated with higher genetic risk score was elevated among those with low and moderate resilience but not among older adults with high resilience.
Physical resilience appears to partly modify mortality risk associated with genetic predisposition to shorter survival. Fostering PR could benefit personalized therapeutic strategies to support healthy aging.
身体恢复力(PR)是指从健康逆境中恢复的能力,被认为可以在衰老过程中缓冲健康挑战。然而,PR与死亡率的关联及其抵消遗传易感性对较短寿命负面影响的能力仍不清楚。
分析了来自瑞典 Kungsholmen 地区老年与护理国家研究(SNAC-K)的 3041 名 60 岁及以上个体的数据。在基线(2001 - 2004 年)时,根据给定的慢性病、药物治疗和社会人口统计学水平,使用残余步态速度评估身体恢复力,分为低恢复力(残余标准差≤ -1)、中等恢复力(-1 < 标准差 < 1)或高恢复力(标准差≥ 1)。从与长寿相关的 4 个单核苷酸多态性(hTERT、APOE、TOMM40、IGF - 1R)得出遗传风险评分。Cox 比例风险模型和拉普拉斯回归分别研究了 18 年死亡率和中位生存期。在分层分析中,将身体恢复力评估为遗传风险评分与死亡率关联的调节因素。
与中等 PR 的个体相比,低恢复力个体的死亡风险更高(风险比:1.28;95%置信区间[1.09, 1.51]),而高 PR 个体则相反(风险比:0.71;95%置信区间[0.60, 0.84])。遗传风险评分高于中位数水平与死亡风险增加相关(风险比:1.34;95%置信区间[1.18, 1.52])。按 PR 分层,低恢复力和中等恢复力个体中,较高遗传风险评分相关的死亡风险升高,但高恢复力的老年人中则不然。
身体恢复力似乎部分改变了与较短生存遗传易感性相关的死亡风险。培养 PR 可能有益于支持健康衰老的个性化治疗策略。