Sampil Nionella Stephen, Daud Aziah, Hairon Suhaily Mohd
Department of Community Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia.
PLoS One. 2025 May 9;20(5):e0322451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322451. eCollection 2025.
The NIOSH Worker Well-Being Questionnaire (WellBQ) offers a comprehensive framework to evaluate worker well-being across five domains: work evaluation, workplace policies, physical environment and safety, health status, and home/community influences. In Malaysia, traditional occupational safety and health (OSH) initiatives have primarily focused on workplace hazards, often neglecting broader psychosocial and organizational factors. To address this gap, this study adapted and validated the Malay version of the WellBQ for healthcare workers, ensuring cultural and contextual relevance. A rigorous translation process, including forward and backward translation, expert panel reviews, and pilot testing, was conducted to retain the original framework while addressing local nuances. Psychometric evaluation involved 366 healthcare workers from Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, employing Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to assess model fit, internal consistency, and construct validity. The Malay WellBQ demonstrated robust psychometric properties, with a Content Validity Index (CVI) of 0.92 and a Face Validity Index (FVI) of 0.98, reflecting high relevance and clarity. CFA confirmed an acceptable model fit (RMSEA = 0.050, CFI = 0.887, TLI = 0.877) and strong internal consistency (CR > 0.7). Convergent validity was observed across most subdomains, although some Average Variance Extracted (AVE) scores fell below 0.5, highlighting areas for refinement. Discriminant validity was achieved within domains but revealed overlaps between some domains, suggesting interconnected constructs. The Malay WellBQ is a reliable and culturally relevant tool for assessing worker well-being, offering actionable insights for workplace policy and intervention development. Further refinements are recommended to enhance construct validity across domains.
美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)员工福祉调查问卷(WellBQ)提供了一个全面的框架,用于评估员工在五个领域的福祉:工作评估、工作场所政策、物理环境与安全、健康状况以及家庭/社区影响。在马来西亚,传统的职业安全与健康(OSH)举措主要侧重于工作场所的危害,往往忽视了更广泛的社会心理和组织因素。为了填补这一空白,本研究对医疗工作者的马来语版WellBQ进行了改编和验证,确保其与文化和背景相关。我们进行了严格的翻译过程,包括正向和反向翻译、专家小组评审以及试点测试,以保留原始框架同时处理当地的细微差别。心理测量评估涉及马来西亚理科大学医院的366名医疗工作者,采用验证性因素分析(CFA)来评估模型拟合度、内部一致性和结构效度。马来语版WellBQ展现出强大的心理测量特性,内容效度指数(CVI)为0.92,表面效度指数(FVI)为0.98,反映出高度的相关性和清晰度。CFA证实模型拟合度可接受(RMSEA = 0.050,CFI = 0.887,TLI = 0.877)且内部一致性强(CR > 0.7)。尽管一些平均提取方差(AVE)得分低于0.5,但在大多数子领域观察到了收敛效度,突出了需要改进的领域。在各领域内实现了区分效度,但揭示了一些领域之间的重叠,表明存在相互关联的结构。马来语版WellBQ是评估员工福祉的可靠且与文化相关的工具,为工作场所政策和干预措施的制定提供了可操作的见解。建议进一步完善以提高各领域的结构效度。