Ettingoff Cole, Von Isenburg Megan, Birrenkott Drew, Ata Hirotaka, Kabrhel Chris, Safdar Basmah, Hasegawa Kohei, Monte Andrew, Korley Frederick Fred, Arnold Cosby Gabrielle, Heitsch Laura, Strehlow Matthew, Limkakeng Alexander T
Trinity School of Medicine, Warner Robins, GA, USA.
Library Services, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Per Med. 2025 Jun;22(3):205-210. doi: 10.1080/17410541.2025.2499438. Epub 2025 May 12.
-Omics technologies - including genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics - are increasingly used in acute care settings. However, the current extent of this research has not been systematically assessed.
To characterize how -omics analyses are applied to acute medical conditions and identify trends, gaps, and implementation barriers.
Eligible studies included human subjects with acute conditions and used -omics biosample analyses for diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive purposes. Feedback from the SAEM Precision Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference informed the search and inclusion criteria. Studies of infectious diseases were excluded for separate analysis.
Of 7,531 screened articles, 421 met inclusion criteria. Most were observational cohort studies, with single nucleotide polymorphism analysis being most common. Cardiovascular and trauma-related conditions were frequently studied. Only 12.4% of studies included children, and just 7 focused exclusively on older adults. One-third were conducted outside of emergency departments. Many studies addressed diverse, uncategorized acute conditions.
While -omics research in acute care is growing, it remains predominantly observational with limited clinical implementation. Barriers include delayed turnaround times, insufficient EHR integration, and underrepresentation of vulnerable populations. Advancing this field requires cross-disciplinary collaboration, focused research priorities, and investment in implementation studies.
组学技术——包括基因组学、转录组学、蛋白质组学和代谢组学——在急性护理环境中的应用越来越广泛。然而,目前这项研究的范围尚未得到系统评估。
描述组学分析如何应用于急性疾病,并确定趋势、差距和实施障碍。
符合条件的研究包括患有急性疾病的人类受试者,并使用组学生物样本分析用于诊断、预后或预测目的。SAEM精准急诊医学共识会议的反馈为检索和纳入标准提供了依据。传染病研究被排除在外以便单独分析。
在7531篇筛选文章中,421篇符合纳入标准。大多数是观察性队列研究,单核苷酸多态性分析最为常见。心血管疾病和创伤相关疾病经常被研究。只有12.4%的研究纳入了儿童,仅有7项研究专门针对老年人。三分之一的研究在急诊科以外进行。许多研究涉及各种未分类的急性疾病。
虽然急性护理中的组学研究正在增加,但它仍然主要是观察性的,临床应用有限。障碍包括周转时间延迟、电子健康记录整合不足以及弱势群体代表性不足。推进这一领域需要跨学科合作、明确的研究重点以及对实施研究的投资。