Suppr超能文献

了解皮肤科医生对数字健康干预措施的接受程度:横断面调查与聚类分析

Understanding Dermatologists' Acceptance of Digital Health Interventions: Cross-Sectional Survey and Cluster Analysis.

作者信息

Reinders Patrick, Augustin Matthias, Otten Marina

机构信息

Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistraße 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany, 49 40741024721.

出版信息

JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 May 21;12:e59757. doi: 10.2196/59757.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital health interventions (DHIs) have the potential to enhance dermatological care by improving quality, patient empowerment, and efficiency. However, adoption remains limited, particularly in Germany.

OBJECTIVE

This study explores German dermatologists' attitudes toward DHIs, clustering them by acceptance levels and analyzing differences in sociodemographics and current and future DHI use.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey, randomly inviting 1000 dermatologists in Germany to participate. The questionnaire consisted of Likert scale items rating the acceptability of DHIs from 1 to 5. Items on the current and future use of DHIs were also included. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify factors and reduce data as input for a 2-step clustering algorithm.

RESULTS

The survey with 170 dermatologists (mean age 50.8, SD 10.3 y; 74/167, 55.7% female) identified four factors through the exploratory factor analysis: (1) "Positive Expectancies and Acceptability of DHIs," (2) "Dermatologists' Digital Competencies," (3) "Negative Expectancies and Barriers," and (4) "Dermatologists' Perspectives on Patients' Acceptability and Competencies." The analysis identified three distinct clusters: (1) Indecisives (n=69)-moderate intentions to use DHIs and moderate negative expectations toward them; (2) Adopters (n=60)-high intentions to use DHIs and high digital competencies; and (3) Rejectors (n=26)-low intentions to use DHIs and low digital competencies. Adopters were significantly younger, more often based in urban centers, and exhibited the highest adoption rates of DHIs compared to the other clusters. Across all clusters, inadequate reimbursement and perceived structural barriers were cited as significant challenges to DHI adoption. Still, only one-third of the Adopters used DHIs including teledermatology or artificial intelligence.

CONCLUSIONS

Dermatologists in Germany exhibited varied levels of acceptance and readiness for DHIs, with demographic and structural factors influencing adoption. Addressing barriers such as reimbursement and investing in digital literacy could promote wider use, potentially reducing health inequalities by improving access to digital health care.

摘要

背景

数字健康干预措施(DHIs)有潜力通过提高质量、增强患者自主权和提升效率来改善皮肤病护理。然而,其采用率仍然有限,尤其是在德国。

目的

本研究探讨德国皮肤科医生对数字健康干预措施的态度,按接受程度对他们进行分类,并分析社会人口统计学以及当前和未来数字健康干预措施使用情况的差异。

方法

我们进行了一项横断面调查,随机邀请德国1000名皮肤科医生参与。问卷包括李克特量表项目,对数字健康干预措施的可接受性从1到5进行评分。还包括关于数字健康干预措施当前和未来使用情况的项目。探索性因素分析用于识别因素并简化数据,作为两步聚类算法的输入。

结果

对170名皮肤科医生(平均年龄50.8岁,标准差10.3岁;74/167,55.7%为女性)的调查通过探索性因素分析确定了四个因素:(1)“对数字健康干预措施的积极预期和可接受性”,(2)“皮肤科医生的数字能力”,(3)“消极预期和障碍”,以及(4)“皮肤科医生对患者可接受性和能力的看法”。分析确定了三个不同的类别:(1)犹豫不决者(n = 69)——使用数字健康干预措施的意愿中等,对其消极预期中等;(2)采用者(n = 60)——使用数字健康干预措施的意愿高,数字能力强;(3)拒绝者(n = 26)——使用数字健康干预措施的意愿低,数字能力弱。与其他类别相比,采用者明显更年轻,更多位于城市中心,并且数字健康干预措施的采用率最高。在所有类别中,报销不足和感知到的结构障碍被认为是采用数字健康干预措施的重大挑战。尽管如此,只有三分之一的采用者使用了包括远程皮肤病学或人工智能在内的数字健康干预措施。

结论

德国皮肤科医生对数字健康干预措施的接受程度和准备情况各不相同,人口统计学和结构因素影响采用情况。解决报销等障碍并投资数字素养可以促进更广泛的使用,有可能通过改善数字医疗保健的可及性来减少健康不平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a85/12118942/51a3558e3d37/humanfactors-v12-e59757-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验