Cappelli Giovanna, Petrini Stefano, Grandoni Francesco, Grassi Carlo, De Donato Immacolata, Signorelli Federica, Napolitano Francesco, Vecchio Roberta, Balestrieri Anna, De Carlo Esterina, De Matteis Giovanna, Martucciello Alessandra
National Reference Centre on Water Buffalo Farming and Productions Hygiene and Technologies (CReNBuf), Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Portici, Italy.
National Reference Centre for Infectious Bovine Rhinotracheitis (IBR), Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Umbria-Marche "Togo Rosati", Perugia, Italy.
Front Vet Sci. 2025 May 7;12:1574794. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1574794. eCollection 2025.
The present study aimed to evaluate two commercial infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) marker vaccines against (BuAHV-1) in water buffalo . Thirteen water buffaloes seronegative to Bovine alphaherpesvirus 1 (BoAHV-1) and BuAHV-1 were selected and divided into three groups (VAX-1, VAX-2, CNT). VAX-1 received an IBR marker (gE-/tk-) live vaccine; VAX-2 received an IBR marker (gE-) inactivated vaccine; CNT represented the controls. Two injections of 2 mL each were administered 21 days apart. On 55 post-vaccination days (PVDs), all animals were challenged infected with wild-type BuAHV-1. Nasal swabs and serum samples were collected at different experimental times and were used for virological, serological and immunological investigations. After seven post-challenge days (PCDs), only the CNT evidenced nasal mucus discharge and increased rectal temperature. The glycoprotein B (gB) of BoAHV-1 positivity was detected using Real-time PCR from PCDs 2 to 7 in vaccinated groups. In the controls, gB positivity was detected from PCD 2 to 15. On PVD 34, all vaccinated animals progressively increased their neutralizing antibody (NA) titers statistically until the end of the experiments. In the controls, the NAs appeared on PCD 10. Flow cytometric analysis of lymphocyte populations revealed that BuAHV-1 activates adaptive immune responses. Throughout the entire examination period, both vaccinated and unvaccinated animals exhibited similar trends. However, significant differences were observed at specific time points in the CD4, CD8, and γδ T lymphocyte subsets between the vaccinated groups and control group. These findings suggested that the IBR marker vaccines tested in this study could be used to protect the water buffalo against BuAHV-1.
本研究旨在评估两种针对水牛的抗牛α疱疹病毒1型(BuAHV - 1)的商业化传染性牛鼻气管炎(IBR)标记疫苗。选择13头对牛α疱疹病毒1型(BoAHV - 1)和BuAHV - 1血清学阴性的水牛,分为三组(VAX - 1、VAX - 2、CNT)。VAX - 1组接种IBR标记(gE - /tk - )活疫苗;VAX - 2组接种IBR标记(gE - )灭活疫苗;CNT组为对照组。每隔21天进行两次每次2 mL的注射。在接种疫苗后55天(PVD),所有动物均用野生型BuAHV - 1进行攻毒感染。在不同实验时间采集鼻拭子和血清样本,用于病毒学、血清学和免疫学研究。攻毒后7天(PCD),只有CNT组出现鼻黏液分泌和直肠温度升高。在接种组,从PCD 2至7使用实时荧光定量PCR检测到BoAHV - 1糖蛋白B(gB)呈阳性。在对照组,从PCD 2至15检测到gB呈阳性。在PVD 34时,所有接种疫苗的动物中和抗体(NA)滴度在实验结束前均有统计学意义的逐步升高。在对照组,NA在PCD 10时出现。淋巴细胞群体的流式细胞术分析显示,BuAHV - 1激活适应性免疫反应。在整个检查期间,接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的动物均表现出相似趋势。然而,在接种组和对照组之间的CD4、CD8和γδ T淋巴细胞亚群的特定时间点观察到显著差异。这些结果表明,本研究中测试的IBR标记疫苗可用于保护水牛免受BuAHV - 1感染。