Department of Public Health Dentistry, SMBT Dental College, Ghulewadi (Amrutnagar), Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751003, India.
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Nov;25(11):6139-6146. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03913-9. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
To evaluate and compare the efficacy of prepared propolis mouth rinse with Chlorhexidine mouthwash on oral pathogens and also the plaque and gingival index scores.
A triple-blind, concurrent parallel randomized controlled trial was conducted on 120 participants randomized to 4 mouth rinse study groups: (1) Hot Ethanolic Propolis extract; (2) Cold Ethanolic Propolis extract; (3) Chlorhexidine and (4) Distilled water. After a washout period of two weeks, oral prophylaxis and polishing was performed. Participants rinsed twice a day for 3 months. Saliva was collected at baseline, 5 min and 1 h for microbiological analysis. Plaque and Gingival index were recorded at baseline, 15 days, 1 month and 3 months. Repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests were used for statistical analysis.
A decline in the concentration of S. mutans was observed in samples collected after the use of mouth rinse (p < 0.05). In comparison with baseline, L. acidophilus and S. mutans count decreased simultaneously when exposed to Hot Ethanolic mouthwash group (5.5 × 10) and Chlorhexidine mouthwash (5.8 × 10) respectively. At the end of 3 months, similar reduction in plaque scores was found in Chlorhexidine (0.45), Cold Ethanolic (0.46), Hot Ethanolic (0.47) mouthwash groups.
Propolis was found to be as efficient as Chlorhexidine in reducing plaque, gingivitis and dental caries pathogens.
Common microorganisms implicated in oral disease are S. mutans and L. acidophilus. There is great paucity of information on antimicrobial activity of propolis, against these microorganisms. Hence, the present study has been taken up to assess the effects of propolis on these oral pathogens.The effects of propolis on oral health have been proved which is obviously a new finding of significance.
评价和比较蜂胶漱口液与洗必泰漱口液对口腔病原菌及菌斑和牙龈指数评分的疗效。
对 120 名参与者进行了一项三盲、同期平行随机对照试验,将其随机分为 4 组漱口液研究组:(1)热乙醇蜂胶提取物;(2)冷乙醇蜂胶提取物;(3)洗必泰;(4)蒸馏水。经过两周的洗脱期后,进行口腔预防和抛光。参与者每天漱口两次,持续 3 个月。在基线、5 分钟和 1 小时采集唾液进行微生物分析。在基线、15 天、1 个月和 3 个月记录菌斑和牙龈指数。采用重复测量方差分析和 Bonferroni 事后检验进行统计学分析。
使用漱口液后采集的样本中观察到变形链球菌浓度下降(p<0.05)。与基线相比,暴露于热乙醇蜂胶组(5.5×10)和洗必泰组(5.8×10)时,嗜酸乳杆菌和变形链球菌计数同时减少。在 3 个月结束时,洗必泰(0.45)、冷乙醇(0.46)、热乙醇(0.47)漱口液组的菌斑评分均有类似的降低。
蜂胶在减少牙菌斑、牙龈炎和龋齿病原菌方面与洗必泰一样有效。
口腔疾病中常见的微生物是变形链球菌和嗜酸乳杆菌。关于蜂胶对这些微生物的抗菌活性的信息非常缺乏。因此,本研究旨在评估蜂胶对这些口腔病原菌的影响。蜂胶对口腔健康的影响已得到证实,这显然是一项具有重要意义的新发现。