Suppr超能文献

在糖尿病护理中检测暴饮暴食的临床病例:引入针对1型和2型糖尿病的糖尿病饮食问题调查-10(DEPS-10)。

Detecting clinical cases of binge eating in diabetes care: Introducing the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-10 (DEPS-10) for type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

作者信息

Klinker Laura Yvonne, Schmitt Andreas, Ehrmann Dominic, Kulzer Bernhard, Hermanns Norbert

机构信息

Research Institute Diabetes Academy Mergentheim (FIDAM), Bad Mergentheim, Germany.

Diabetes Center Mergentheim (DZM), Bad Mergentheim, Germany.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2025 Aug;42(8):e70060. doi: 10.1111/dme.70060. Epub 2025 May 29.

Abstract

AIMS

Binge eating disorders (BED) are underdiagnosed in diabetes care, despite being the most common eating problem for diabetes patients. While diabetes-specific screening for disordered eating behaviour is recommended, the only diabetes-specific instrument available, Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised (DEPS-R), focuses on type 1 diabetes and rapid-acting insulin, limiting its use across diabetes types and treatment regimens. This study aimed to develop a non-insulin version of the DEPS-R and evaluate its screening performance for BED in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

The DEPS-R was reduced to 10 non-insulin-specific items (DEPS-10). As part of the ongoing pro-mental study, 679 people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes completed the baseline survey and took part in diagnostic interviews to assess BED. The screening performance of the DEPS-10 was tested via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and compared with DEPS-R and food-related items of the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID).

RESULTS

N = 24 participants (total = 3.5%; type 1 = 2.9%, type 2 = 4.3%) were diagnosed with a current BED. The DEPS-10 performed well in screening for BED (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.92, p < 0.001) comparable with the DEPS-R (AUC = 0.92, p < 0.001) and exceeded the performance of food-related PAID items (AUC = 0.82, p < 0.001). A cut-off score of ≥15 showed optimal sensitivity and specificity in BED screening. People who met the cut-off had significantly higher BMI and HbA1c and more diabetes distress, depressive and anxiety symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

DEPS-10 is a reliable screening instrument for BED. Its associations with glycaemic and mental health outcomes reflect its good construct validity comparable to DEPS-R.

摘要

目的

尽管暴饮暴食症(BED)是糖尿病患者中最常见的饮食问题,但在糖尿病护理中却未得到充分诊断。虽然建议对饮食紊乱行为进行糖尿病特异性筛查,但唯一可用的糖尿病特异性工具——修订版糖尿病饮食问题调查(DEPS-R),主要关注1型糖尿病和速效胰岛素,限制了其在不同糖尿病类型和治疗方案中的应用。本研究旨在开发DEPS-R的非胰岛素版本,并评估其对1型和2型糖尿病患者BED的筛查性能。

方法

将DEPS-R简化为10个非胰岛素特异性项目(DEPS-10)。作为正在进行的促进心理健康研究的一部分,679名1型或2型糖尿病患者完成了基线调查,并参加了诊断访谈以评估BED。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析测试DEPS-10的筛查性能,并与DEPS-R和糖尿病问题领域(PAID)中与食物相关的项目进行比较。

结果

N = 24名参与者(总计 = 3.5%;1型 = 2.9%,2型 = 4.3%)被诊断为当前患有BED。DEPS-10在筛查BED方面表现良好(曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.92,p < 0.001),与DEPS-R相当(AUC = 0.92,p < 0.001),且超过了与食物相关的PAID项目的性能(AUC = 0.82,p < 0.001)。≥15的截断分数在BED筛查中显示出最佳的敏感性和特异性。达到截断分数的人BMI和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)显著更高,糖尿病困扰、抑郁和焦虑症状更多。

结论

DEPS-10是一种可靠的BED筛查工具。它与血糖和心理健康结果的关联反映了其与DEPS-R相当的良好结构效度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37f2/12257434/19838e1d2be8/DME-42-e70060-g004.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验