Carver C S, Ganellen R J, Behar-Mitrani V
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985 Sep;49(3):722-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.49.3.722.
Several instruments have been developed recently to measure cognitive styles associated with depression. At least four of them appear to have an underlying similarity. Each appears to reflect a tendency for respondents to infer a general lack of self-worth (or a continued likelihood of bad events) on the basis of a single discrete failure. The present research was a comparative test of one of these scales against the other three in terms of associations with Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores. Though all instruments were significantly correlated with BDI, partial correlations revealed that our generalization scale was a more robust predictor of BDI than were (a) a measure of characterological self-blame, (b) a measure of cognitive bias, and (c) a measure of attributional style.
最近开发了几种仪器来测量与抑郁症相关的认知风格。其中至少有四种似乎有潜在的相似性。每种仪器似乎都反映出受访者基于一次离散的失败就推断出普遍缺乏自我价值(或坏事持续发生的可能性)的倾向。本研究是对这些量表中的一个与其他三个量表在与贝克抑郁量表(BDI)得分的关联方面进行的比较测试。尽管所有仪器都与BDI显著相关,但偏相关分析表明,我们的泛化量表比(a)一种性格上的自我责备测量、(b)一种认知偏差测量和(c)一种归因风格测量更能有力地预测BDI。