Suppr超能文献

国家级男性运动员的激素、抗氧化剂及身体成分差异:有氧训练与无氧训练的对比研究

Hormonal, antioxidant, and body composition differences in national level male athletes: a comparative study of aerobic and anaerobic training.

作者信息

Jaradat Manar Burhan, Maghayreh Eyyad, Husain Waqar, Trabelsi Khaled, Amawi Adam, Jahrami Haitham, Ghazzawi Hadeel Ali

机构信息

Department of Nutrition and Food Technology, School of Agriculture, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

Department of Basic and Applied Sciences, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Balqa, Jordan.

出版信息

Front Sports Act Living. 2025 May 20;7:1568873. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1568873. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Competitive athletes exhibit distinct physiological adaptations depending on their sport type and training techniques. These variations influence body composition, hunger-regulating hormones, and antioxidant defense mechanisms, which collectively impact performance, recovery, and progression. This study aimed to compare body composition, serum levels of ghrelin, leptin, and glutathione (GSH), and their interrelationships in national level male athletes engaged in aerobic and anaerobic sports.

METHODS

Twenty competitive athletes (aged 17-38 years) were evenly divided into aerobic (AS) and anaerobic (AnS) sports groups. Body composition-including skeletal muscle mass (SMM), fat-free mass (FFM), fat mass (FM), and percent body fat (PBF)-was assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Blood samples were collected after 8 h of fasting to measure ghrelin, leptin, and GSH levels. Dietary intake was evaluated using a 24-h recall. Group differences were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney -test, and correlations were determined using Spearman's rank correlation, with statistical significance set at  < 0.05.

RESULTS

The AnS group displayed significantly higher SMM and FFM compared to the AS group ( < 0.05). Ghrelin levels were significantly lower in the AS group ( < 0.05), while leptin and GSH levels did not differ significantly between groups. Positive correlations were observed between ghrelin and both SMM and FFM ( = 0.585,  = 0.007), and between GSH and dietary protein intake ( = 0.476,  = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Anaerobic exercise enhances muscle mass, while aerobic exercise supports appetite suppression. Limitations include the small sample size and reliance on 24-h dietary recall. Future research should use larger, more diverse samples and explore combined training effects. Recommendations include incorporating resistance training into aerobic regimens to optimize muscle mass and monitoring protein intake to support antioxidant defense.

摘要

背景

竞技运动员根据其运动类型和训练技术表现出不同的生理适应性。这些差异会影响身体成分、饥饿调节激素和抗氧化防御机制,这些因素共同影响运动表现、恢复和进步。本研究旨在比较从事有氧运动和无氧运动的国家级男性运动员的身体成分、血清胃饥饿素、瘦素和谷胱甘肽(GSH)水平及其相互关系。

方法

20名竞技运动员(年龄17 - 38岁)平均分为有氧运动组(AS)和无氧运动组(AnS)。使用生物电阻抗分析(BIA)评估身体成分,包括骨骼肌质量(SMM)、去脂体重(FFM)、脂肪量(FM)和体脂百分比(PBF)。禁食8小时后采集血样以测量胃饥饿素、瘦素和GSH水平。使用24小时饮食回顾法评估饮食摄入量。使用Mann-Whitney检验分析组间差异,使用Spearman等级相关性确定相关性,统计学显著性设定为<0.05。

结果

与AS组相比,AnS组的SMM和FFM显著更高(<0.05)。AS组的胃饥饿素水平显著更低(<0.05),而两组之间的瘦素和GSH水平无显著差异。胃饥饿素与SMM和FFM均呈正相关(=0.585,=0.007),GSH与饮食蛋白质摄入量呈正相关(=0.476,=0.03)。

结论

无氧运动可增加肌肉量,而有氧运动有助于抑制食欲。局限性包括样本量小和依赖24小时饮食回顾法。未来研究应使用更大、更多样化的样本并探索联合训练效果。建议包括将抗阻训练纳入有氧训练方案以优化肌肉量,并监测蛋白质摄入量以支持抗氧化防御。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c68/12130051/38820f0cc439/fspor-07-1568873-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验