• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从生命周期动态到风险分区:采矿恢复策略对淡水生态系统服务流的影响。

From lifecycle dynamics to risk zoning: Impact of mining restoration strategies on freshwater ecosystem services flow.

作者信息

Xiao Sheng, Zhao Yanling, Deng Hairong, Ren He

机构信息

College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Beijing, D11 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100083, China.

Academy of Eco-Civilization Development for Jing-Jin-Ji Megalopolis, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, 300387, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2025 Aug;389:126098. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126098. Epub 2025 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126098
PMID:40480118
Abstract

Effective water resource management requires a comprehensive understanding of freshwater service flow (FSF) processes and their interactions with mine restoration strategies. This study develops a novel framework integrating FSF dynamics with regional risk assessment to address ecological restoration and resource management in mining-affected areas, demonstrated through Liaoning Province, China. The model integrates land use change scenarios based on different mine restoration strategies and evaluates their impacts in 24 simulations based on restoration strategies and social demand. Quantitative analysis reveals significant spatial differences in freshwater services supply and demand, with vegetation proportion and landscape connectivity having important mediating effects in their dynamics. The flow network is relatively complete, but upstream inflows are essential to alleviate resource pressure, particularly in western regions with limited or no inflows. Among 24 simulated scenarios, the food supply scenario under reduced demand (Scenario 10) exhibit optimal flow patterns, while the combined development scenario under growth demand (scenario 8) highlights vulnerabilities. Under a unified demand context, the surplus range of the combined development (CD) scenario is the smallest, while that of the ecological protection (EP) scenario is the largest, closely related to differences in restoration measures. Risk assessments reveal pronounced spatial disparities: core and improvement zones in the central Liao River and Taizi River basins exhibit low risks, while protection and restoration zones in the western Daling River basin face critical supply-demand states requiring focused interventions. Vulnerable zones, characterized by limited ecological functioning and no external inflows, necessitate moderate artificial measures. This research highlights the profound impact of mine restoration strategies on FSF dynamics and their role in reducing ecological risks. The proposed framework provides actionable insights for integrating FSF processes into environmental management, contributing to sustainable resource use and risk control in mining-impacted regions.

摘要

有效的水资源管理需要全面了解淡水服务流(FSF)过程及其与矿山恢复策略的相互作用。本研究开发了一个将FSF动态与区域风险评估相结合的新颖框架,以解决受采矿影响地区的生态恢复和资源管理问题,并在中国辽宁省进行了实例展示。该模型整合了基于不同矿山恢复策略的土地利用变化情景,并根据恢复策略和社会需求在24次模拟中评估了它们的影响。定量分析揭示了淡水服务供需的显著空间差异,植被比例和景观连通性在其动态变化中具有重要的中介作用。水流网络相对完整,但上游流入对于缓解资源压力至关重要,特别是在没有或几乎没有流入的西部地区。在24个模拟情景中,需求减少情况下的粮食供应情景(情景10)呈现出最优的水流模式,而需求增长情况下的综合开发情景(情景8)则凸显了脆弱性。在统一需求背景下,综合开发(CD)情景的盈余范围最小,而生态保护(EP)情景的盈余范围最大,这与恢复措施的差异密切相关。风险评估揭示了明显的空间差异:辽河和太子河流域中部的核心区和改善区风险较低,而大凌河流域西部的保护区和恢复区面临关键的供需状态,需要重点干预。以生态功能有限且无外部流入为特征的脆弱区需要适度的人工措施。本研究强调了矿山恢复策略对FSF动态的深远影响及其在降低生态风险方面的作用。所提出的框架为将FSF过程纳入环境管理提供了可操作的见解,有助于受采矿影响地区的可持续资源利用和风险控制。

相似文献

1
From lifecycle dynamics to risk zoning: Impact of mining restoration strategies on freshwater ecosystem services flow.从生命周期动态到风险分区:采矿恢复策略对淡水生态系统服务流的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2025 Aug;389:126098. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126098. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
2
Optimizing river restoration: A multi-scenario approach to barrier removal prioritization.优化河流修复:一种用于确定拆除障碍物优先级的多情景方法。
J Environ Manage. 2025 Aug;389:126176. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126176. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
3
Ecological management zoning in Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China based on the balance of supply and demand for ecosystem services.基于生态系统服务供需平衡的中国内蒙古呼和浩特市生态管理分区
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2025 Jun;36(6):1651-1660. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202506.025.
4
Framework and methodology for hierarchical determination of ecological conservation priority areas in China's Taihang Mountains.中国太行山区生态保护优先区域分层确定的框架与方法
J Environ Manage. 2025 Aug;389:125991. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125991. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
5
Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in Anhui Province, China based on functional zone identification.基于功能区识别的中国安徽省生态系统服务的权衡与协同作用
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2025 Jun;36(6):1616-1626. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202506.026.
6
[Analysis of Urban Vegetation Changes and Drivers in City of Plateau River Valleys].[高原河谷城市植被变化及其驱动因素分析]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jun 8;46(6):3645-3655. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202401244.
7
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
8
Assessing and mapping changes in soil ecosystem services and soil threats in agroecosystems through scenario-based approaches - A systematic review.通过基于情景的方法评估和绘制农业生态系统中土壤生态系统服务和土壤威胁的变化——一项系统综述
Sci Total Environ. 2025 Feb 25;966:178646. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178646. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
9
Deciphering the spatial code of the Yellow River Basin: A novel framework for optimizing land use functions and zoning identification strategies.解读黄河流域空间密码:优化土地利用功能与分区识别策略的新框架
J Environ Manage. 2025 Aug;389:126168. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126168. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
10
[Changes and Driving Factors of Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand in the Yellow River Basin].[黄河流域生态系统服务供需变化及驱动因素]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jun 8;46(6):3672-3680. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202404237.